The "stupid little questions that don't deserve their own thread" thread.

Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.

The Something Awful Forums > The Finer Arts > Creative Convention > The "stupid little questions that don't deserve their own thread" thread.

SirRobin: Mar 2, 2002

gmc9987 posted:

All of them were created while employed by a company.

Then you should ask the company. Nobody here has a copy of your contract or any agreements you or they might have made regarding copyright.

# ¿ May 26, 2009 09:59

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 04:31

SirRobin: Mar 2, 2002

teh_Shane posted:

What's the best way to go about getting as much light into the shot in as little time as possible?

I'd like to get a night time shot that looks day time, with stars in the sky - however I don't really want the stars to appear as massive streaks careening across the photo.

Open up your aperture as wide as it will go, turn the ISO up to 11 and hope you're good at picking faint stars from noise.

The trick to astrophotography isn't in minimising shutter time it's in following the movement of the stars with a long exposure

SirRobin fucked around with this message at 12:29 on Jun 4, 2009

# ¿ Jun 4, 2009 12:25

The Something Awful Forums > The Finer Arts > Creative Convention > The "stupid little questions that don't deserve their own thread" thread.