|
pipes! posted:Different people do different things for different reasons. Stop loving up such an informative thread. To add to this, if you do not like a specific technique, don't use it. Nobody's forcing you to.
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2009 17:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 10:08 |
|
|
Note that quazi's method works if the picture lends itself to. If the sun was visible at all, it will create lens flare and possibly ruin the frame where the building was correctly exposed. Just wanted to point that caveat.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2009 19:22
|
|
|
poopinmymouth posted:Yep, said that in my post, I know it has more control, yet I'm proficient in photoshop, and find it far easier to WB in LR with the WB tools than photoshop. I guess that answers my question that there is no easy way to correct it within PS. Sometimes match color works: Image->Adjustments->Match Color-> Neutralize It is a destructive procedure though.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2009 12:58
|
|
|
diarrhea for girls posted:Thanks WZ! I'll give it a try when I have something worth using it on. It's definitely not a portrait preset. 'Cause I tried. Works beautiful for landscapes though. Thanks White Zombie 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2010 03:06
|
|
|
brad industry posted:You have to start with good overall color to begin with. What brad is saying is right on the money, this is usually shot right at dusk, look at the timestamp: 21:33:09 ...which is 9:30 pm. So a tripod will be nice to get as much exposure as possible.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2010 02:43
|
|
|
That content fill thingy is probably going to be useful for portrait people like and limited space. In other news: How can I replicate Lightroom's Heal tool in Photoshop? They behave, and function, slightly different. I like Lightroom's result better, so much that I would use the heal tool on Lightroom over Photoshop's Patch tool sometimes.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2010 18:17
|
|
|
brad industry posted:Yeah I do this stuff all the time. It's not impossible or hard, it's just tedious. Key word right there. People who need to push an image out quickly will love this tech.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2010 14:57
|
|
|
Forgot how to make abs look better, found this easy to use tutorial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRINyoIIIrg My results: Before  After  (Are they over done? Or do they look alright?)
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2010 23:02
|
|
|
brad industry posted:I can't tell what you did either, just increased contrast? Pretty much yes, increase darks and highlights and mask appropriately.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2010 23:31
|
|
|
poopinmymouth posted:I forgot to mention, don't just use big rear end soft brushes when doing muscles. That only increases volume. If you want to actually make a muscle look defined, you need hard edges, black right against white. Small soft brushes are for this. I didn't really make his abs any bigger, I just made the creases between them sharper, as if his skin was thinner and shrink wrapped. Thank you, much appreciated. I think the difference is that you used sharper brushes to define the muscles, whereas I used softer ones.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2010 23:50
|
|
|
brad industry posted:Ever since I started using lots of adjustment brushes LR has been slow as gently caress, which is unfortunate because I prefer to do dodging/burning in the RAW conversion. This times 10
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2010 22:03
|
|
|
TequilaJesus posted:Thank you. Did you try to terminate the process in the Task Manager?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2011 22:57
|
|
|
How about deleting the lockfile? http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=741777
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2011 00:29
|
|
|
brad industry posted:The main thing that jumps out at me about that is that they softened the background and then sharpened/went crazy with contrast on the subject (with light and also obviously PS). And then dodged (IMO poorly) behind the subject. Also good hair. Try to add kick to anyone without proper hair and you'll see a lot more hairs sticking around. Either that or very good PS.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2011 17:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 10:08 |
|
|
Cross_ posted:For people playing "guess the llighting", it's actually on the flickr page: PPIMM wins
|
|
#
¿
Jan 28, 2011 20:25
|
|