|
Flobbster posted:Err, I think you misread my question. I'm not looking for a JS interpreter (in fact BIRT comes with Rhino for doing its reports), I'm looking for a comprehensive reference that talks about advanced JavaScript feature more in terms of a programming language in its own right and less as a web development add-on. Douglas Crockford's books are pretty good for this. His latest, java script: The Good Parts is a great resource and is probably along the lines of what you're looking for. Take a look through the Table of Contents.
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2009 17:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 05:25 |
|
|
Kekekela posted:Start by resolving your javascript errors. For one, I don't think document.LottoFrm.txtcount will work, you can give the text box an id and call document.getElementById('txtcount') instead. (The latest version of firefox requires you to go to Tools>ErrorConsole to see the errors, not sure about IE et al) To add to this, you could also install the Firebug extension to get even better Javascript debugging if you're using Firefox. If you're not using FF, I suggest you start because debugging Javascript in IE (and, in my opinion, even in Safari, Opera, or Chrome) is a pain when compared to the power you get from Firebug.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2009 18:24
|
|
|
rotor posted:Microsoft script editor is imho just as good as firebug It's ok, but I'd argue that it's quite a bit less convenient to use than Firebug, generally speaking. The MSE tends to hang a lot, as well as (unless I've missed out on a better way) having to be re-opened every time there's another error. I admit I don't use it often but I've always had very mixed / slightly negative feelings about debugging with it. With Firebug, it's all right there in the same window (or popped out, whatever), with the errors cleanly displayed. I dunno, it's just a better overall experience in general, if you ask me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2009 20:26
|
|
|
Supervillin posted:Modifying the DOM again should trigger it, some libraries (I think scriptaculous?) create, append, and remove a text node containing only spaces. I did a little searching and found that adding and removing a class, or even just reassigning a class works. While I haven't run into this problem in a while, and we came up with some other workaround or solution... this is great to know for future reference. Thanks!
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2009 17:52
|
|
|
Ether Frenzy posted:You can't do a satisfactory image replacement of the submit button (or at least not have it work in IE 6, which we stupidly continue to support - would typically be done with CSS v2) with input type="submit", it has to be input type="button" to use an image as the button. You could use the <button> tag though, and get what you wanted. <button type="submit">Some Crap</button> should work in IE6, and be styled with CSS just fine as well.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2009 19:52
|
|
|
dimebag dinkman posted:And the value will be the HTML inside it, not the value="..." attribute. I don't know how to work around the first limitation (sans-javascript), but you could just use CSS to style the button and put whatever relevant value you want in the button tag. <button type="submit" id="submitter">MyValue</button> and hide it with CSS text-indent #submitter { background: transparent url('/path/to/image.png') no-repeat; border: 0; text-indent: -999em; }
|
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2009 18:21
|
|
|
Save the whales posted:Although the text is being indented out of view and the height attribute is fixed, would it still stretch to fit the text? I don't have all the major browsers available to me right now so I'm not sure. If you give it a width, the button will be that width regardless of how much the text is, because it's indented.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2009 15:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 05:25 |
|
|
Just use jQuery for it:code:
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2009 00:56
|
|