Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Calenth
Jul 11, 2001



Entropic posted:


The Player of Games - The second of the Culture books, and a very straightforward tale. It has none of the disjointed jumping back and forth in time that shows up in so many of Banks' books, and it's a very good introduction to The Culture as a setting. Personally I found it to be a fun read, but a little too simplistic. It has far less moral ambiguity than most of the rest of the Culture series.
Personally, I found the first of his SF books, Consider Phlebas, to be a bit lacklustre and I'm glad I didn't start with it. It's an entertaining enough space opera romp, but by the end I was left thinking "so what?"


I read a fair number of Culture novels a while back, and while I respect Banks as an author, I remember having a significant distaste for both of those books in particular -- Consider Phlebas and The Player of Games.

The Player of Games seemed like he was pulling a reverse Heinlein and using sci-fi to take cheap shots at opposing ideologies -- i.e., he's positing a post-scarcity environment, then writing a sci-fi novel attacking a capitalist (and conveniently also inherently sexist, etc.) society because, hey, look, they aren't an enlightened post-scarcity socialist economy! How evil of them! Of course, plenty of great SF has been just a political vehicle -- from H.G. Wells on down -- so that's not really a criticism as such, just something I personally found irritating. It seemed like he was taking cheap shots.

Consider Phlebas I just found depressing. I read it as a deconstruction of the heroic sci-fi epic -- taking the standard SF trope of individual, capable, hero protagonists and deconstructing it. Which is well and good intellectually but an approach I found somewhat fundamentally nihilistic and depressing. Again, it's not a bad book at all, but I found myself just disliking its world-view.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread