Entropic posted:
I read a fair number of Culture novels a while back, and while I respect Banks as an author, I remember having a significant distaste for both of those books in particular -- Consider Phlebas and The Player of Games. The Player of Games seemed like he was pulling a reverse Heinlein and using sci-fi to take cheap shots at opposing ideologies -- i.e., he's positing a post-scarcity environment, then writing a sci-fi novel attacking a capitalist (and conveniently also inherently sexist, etc.) society because, hey, look, they aren't an enlightened post-scarcity socialist economy! How evil of them! Of course, plenty of great SF has been just a political vehicle -- from H.G. Wells on down -- so that's not really a criticism as such, just something I personally found irritating. It seemed like he was taking cheap shots. Consider Phlebas I just found depressing. I read it as a deconstruction of the heroic sci-fi epic -- taking the standard SF trope of individual, capable, hero protagonists and deconstructing it. Which is well and good intellectually but an approach I found somewhat fundamentally nihilistic and depressing. Again, it's not a bad book at all, but I found myself just disliking its world-view.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2009 18:48 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 08:44 |