|
At work we just started using subversion (were using Serena Version Manager which is horribly bad), we went with subversion because it has more integration with other software (their requirement not mine) than mercurial/git (our second choices). Regardless, easy sailing so far with SVN. My question is, what are good Subversion GUIs for OS X? I know there is Versions and svnX, but wanted to know you guys' experience with these and/or other tools. I am very comfortable with the command line and don't really care for SVN GUIs (although Tortoise has spoiled me silly), but my team isn't so inclined.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2009 16:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:12 |
|
MononcQc posted:One architect where I work has got some kind of idea he suggested on the corner of a table a few weeks ago, basically replacing the database back-end of a web-service for text and html documents with either git or mercurial. Why not use a document database like CouchDB or ThruDB? ThruDB seems specially oriented toward what you want.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2009 20:50 |
|
Janin posted:That's like saying I can run SourceSafe natively in Linux, because it works in Wine. I don't want to install GCC/Bash/etc just for a source-control system. I don't think you "get" msysgit.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2009 19:34 |
|
Sartak posted:I just converted nearly all of my repositories to git. I am working on this right now, with an svn frontend so our retarded multi-thousand-dollar project management crapware can see it.
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2009 23:12 |
|
nobleclem posted:We use SVN and I would consider moving us to git however two things keep me from pushing it... 1) Server Admins, 2) No good mac GUI's for the designers. at least gitX is 10x better than svnX. For us we can't get Versions because one of the reasons they let us switch to something not absolutely poo poo (that we pay thousands for) is because we promised it'd cost nothing.
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2009 06:28 |