Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
The junk collector
Aug 10, 2005
Hey do you want that motherboard?

Ham Equity posted:

Landlord would be a dealbreaker, I'd have to march myself to the guillotine.

I'm not a landlord. I am just allowing a group of unrelated people to reside in a property I own through an incorporation with several other investors for a contractually predetermined length of time in exchange for cash and holding a security deposit in escrow.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The junk collector
Aug 10, 2005
Hey do you want that motherboard?

Cyrano4747 posted:

The only way out of this is new construction, and the only way out of THAT in a lot of areas is getting rid of restrictive zoning that prevents high density housing from being built.

One thing that really strikes me is just how hosed zoning is in some areas. The little city north of Dallas where I spend a lot of time now has something like half the city in "Special Zoning" because the standard zonings are so restrictive no one can build anything meaningful. The "Future City Development" plan they published basically puts 90% of the city into Special Zoning because any sort of mixed use even just co-located uses are not allowed in the standard zoning codes. Having to create a special zoning code for every new construction also adds a lot of cost to development projects.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply