|
After having a tripod for a few months I actually decided to use properly and get some long exposures in London. I used FP4+ at ISO 200 (I can't even remember why I decided to push it anymore). I'd like to give this one another go one day because I think it has more potential than what I got out of it. I think this was 2 minutes or so. I think this was 4 or so seconds. Just had to give the ol' light trails thing a try. This stuff is really fun, though the adjustments for reciprocity failure on B&W film are pretty intense. Again about 2+ minutes I think, original metered exposure would have been around 32 seconds. More dusk than night. I saw some kids messing around on the riverbank skipping stones and the like. It was a rush setting up the tripod in time to capture this. Not sure how long the exposure was anymore. But over 30 seconds. It was a bit overexposed on the negative though.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2010 20:52 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 14:13 |
|
GWBBQ posted:I can't put my finger on what this reminds me of, but it reminds me of something and I really like it. I'm sure I've seen something like it before, but I have no idea really what I was drawing on exactly.
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2010 06:54 |
|
William T. Hornaday posted:Alexey Titarenko, perhaps? Ahhhh! Yes that must be it.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2010 21:10 |
|
Ooooh star trails! I have one of those! first one that really came out how I wanted. Expired Velvia 100f. Film is a lot more fun for long exposure.
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2010 16:16 |