|
How long is a "long" enough exposure to get that water effect? Nvm found the exif info from the first couple images. Then my other question is how dark is it really when you take these shots? I went to my local reservoir to try stuff like this and with f22 iso 200 exposure compensation 5 and the slowest I could shoot was 1/20th of a second. Maybe it just needs to be much darker then I think? Or does this kind of technique only work on westward facing beaches with large spaces in front that don't cast shadow? Evilkiksass fucked around with this message at 06:16 on Jul 16, 2009 |
#
¿
Jul 16, 2009 06:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 6, 2024 06:36 |
|
|
I think I will have to find a better location to shoot, this was at a resvoir that is nestled in a valley and the light is just horrible and the water is too deep. What would it look like if you did a 5-10 second exposure of a creek and then had a very weak flash at the end....?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2009 01:06
|
|
|
Ringo R posted:Amazing photos in this thread. Here's one of mine which people in PAD seemed to like. Hope it counts as landscape... Ringo R, this is absolutely stunning, what kind of post processing did you do to this? Could you post the original?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2009 20:17
|
|
|
grack posted:I tried to place the elements in the photo such that it could be divided in to thirds both horizontally (foreground/fisherman and rod/trees) and vertically (fisherman/blank/fishing rods). Why does it matter what thread he posts the crit in? Also, why do you feel the need for strict adherence to rule of thirds?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2014 23:05
|
|