|
These are probably my favorite landscapes that I have made.   
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2009 22:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2009 09:02
|
|
|
Eegah posted:That seriously looks like a Bob Ross painting. Bob Ross had a much better understanding of composition and colour theory.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2009 06:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2009 09:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 10, 2009 22:34
|
|
|
KFJ posted:I like both of these. From this past weekend: 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2009 22:59
|
|
|
RangerScum posted:Nice shot! Thanks, not so sure about this one. I feel like this sort of thing is probably better achieved with a tripod and long exposure. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2009 22:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2010 05:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2010 07:50
|
|
|
Thanks.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2010 19:14
|
|
|
Making rocks look sexy. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2010 21:47
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2010 08:56
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2010 04:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2010 08:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2010 05:06
|
|
|
 Rainier National Park
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2010 06:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2010 08:50
|
|
|
   Trees of the valley in late fall.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2010 01:20
|
|
|
Cross_ posted:If this was taken with a homemade pinhole camera- congrats! Otherwise, why would you intentionally create low quality photos ? I don't get it. Because it's cool and hip.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2010 02:03
|
|
|
Some shots from Whistler/Blackcomb.  
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2011 01:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2011 22:13
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2011 06:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2011 23:20
|
|
|
   Got back the MF test rolls from a mail-in lab. The scans are so much better than what I've been getting from my flatbed. e: Also 
365 Nog Hogger fucked around with this message at 10:01 on Jun 23, 2011 |
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2011 09:53
|
|
|
Scatterfold posted:This is well nice; what film were you using for these? The one you quoted and the Tree are Ektar 100, the house is Astia 100, and the road is Kodak 400UC. I can't decide if I like this shot (Ektar) of the road better. 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2011 02:40
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2011 01:49
|
|
|
Eugene.jpeg and Eugene2.jpeg 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2012 01:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2012 23:20
|
|
|
What cable?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2012 07:26
|
|
|
I think your original framing was superior, the balance of the sky is necessary.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2012 23:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2012 06:37
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2012 04:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2012 04:34
|
|
|
aliencowboy posted:Holy poo poo. I love this. Thanks, the entire constructed space for the US track+field Olympic trials is insane, Nike put a lot into it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2012 21:06
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2012 04:23
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2012 16:49
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2012 20:57
|
|
|
quazi posted:
I dunno, I immediately noticed, it looks pretty fake to me.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2012 00:44
|
|
|
Smekerman posted:Are you talking about the blend or the actual skies? If you're talking of the latter, I've seen skies like that (ie. with two different hues in the clouds), there's nothing fake about it. Both, but every part of that image just looks like a cg render.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2012 20:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
I didn't say there's anything wrong with it, just that it looks very artificial.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2012 22:23
|
|