|
Eh, I thought the whole point of hyperfocal focusing was to shoot stopped enough that your foreground *and* background are focused
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2009 07:58 |
|
|
# ¿ May 6, 2024 05:58 |
|
When someone smarter than me explained it, what I understood is that you shift focus back from infinity and stop down until both foreground and background/infinity are in the field. It's pretty easy to visualize on old-rear end lenses with both a focus and a depth of field scale.
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2009 15:43 |
|
Twenties Superstar posted:
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2009 11:33 |
|
Twenties Superstar posted:Just curious, what in particular makes you think about Stephen Shore?
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2009 00:12 |
|
It's a vodka not-so-graduated filter, duh.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2009 01:10 |
|
Some pretty impressive mountain photography
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2009 21:38 |
|
Interrupting Moss posted:sooooo that mountain isn't real.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2009 00:52 |
|
With just a wee bit less vignette you'd really be on to something.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2009 03:07 |
|
Dread Head posted:Yeah, I try to minimize the visibility of GND filters but the trees had very little colour to begin with so I just gave up and went with it.
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2009 09:45 |
|
guidoanselmi posted:scanned, it's like 500+ MP, and i dont have enough scatch space on my windows partion to dodge and burn it to look good. i did the above by shrinking it down to something far more manageable. when i gave my windows partition 20 gigs i totally forgot about scratch space
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2009 09:22 |
|
That first shot's quite interesting, and it seems the location has enough going on to lend itself to not-landscape photography. I mean if you're bored just try it.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2010 23:24 |
|
Shoot the dogs, or the people, or the loving lack of otters. Just not a 1/3 2/3 beachscape.
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2010 03:06 |
|
big cheese posted:My office view (literally):
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2010 00:47 |
|
Well that's nice
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2010 11:33 |
|
You could pull off a really sweet geometric photograph with that mound in the middle.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2010 11:52 |
|
scottch posted:Jesus Christ. I may shoot Nikon SLR, but I am definitely getting an S90 next time I need a P&S.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2010 08:13 |
|
You're pulling your skies a bit much, pal
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2010 10:25 |
|
Toss a 1.5 stop gradient on it if you shot raw, it'll surprise you.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2010 17:46 |
|
You can somewhat compensate for haze with exposure and contrast comp, but it's never going to be ideal.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2010 15:55 |
|
xzzy posted:I'm gonna have to show those pictures to the wife.. I grew up in Anchorage, been trying to convince her that that's where we want to settle. She hates snow however, which is a big roadblock. I need to convince her that the summers are worth it.
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2010 18:57 |
|
What kind of film is this?
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2010 12:51 |
|
I want to stuff that HDR button of yours somewhere unpleasant. Unfortunately you appear to be more beefcake than I.
|
# ¿ Nov 24, 2010 15:29 |
|
77mm CPL's are gently caress-you expensive 8(
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2010 13:31 |
|
That water is gently caress-you good. Maybe work a bit more contrast in the distant coast and skies?
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2010 12:51 |
|
TheAngryDrunk posted:How about this:
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2011 15:12 |
|
|
# ¿ May 6, 2024 05:58 |
|
Hi. Yes.
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2012 14:25 |