|
ConspicuousEvil posted:Here's the re-edit: Something does not look right, the sky around the clouds is slightly darker, did you run this through HDR software? The whole image kind of looks "blotchy, not sure what it is. ----
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2009 08:00 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 11:41 |
|
whaam posted:Digging the first one, the contrast of the water against the dark beach with a nice sky. You must be done editing your trip photos if we are seeing rocks again Haha, yeah for the most part I will probably go over the whole lot again to see if there is anything I changed my mind about.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2009 17:43 |
|
Depends what I am taking with me, and by that I mean it depends if I am taking my super tele. If I am not taking it then I will take my camera bag backpack with my short lenses in it. If I am taking my super tele then I will put it in a real backpack and I will take my wide and maybe my 80-200. When using my real backpack I have all my lenses in lens cases. Example:
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2009 21:11 |
|
One I missed from my road trip.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2009 00:20 |
|
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2009 17:35 |
|
quazi posted:Nice smooth water! It's especially pleasing with the little warm spots in a sea of cool tones. The only issue is that your GND filter is pretty noticeable with the dark trees in the upper-right. But I still want to go walking through there.. We don't get those kinds of beach scenes here in Oklahoma. Yeah, I try to minimize the visibility of GND filters but the trees had very little colour to begin with so I just gave up and went with it.
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2009 05:52 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:Did you GND the shot or layered multiple exposures? Multi layers.
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2009 23:13 |
|
I was there in early October, a bit different at that time of year!
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2009 23:14 |
|
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2009 08:33 |
|
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2009 08:07 |
|
Got my rear end out of bed for sunrise this weekend.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2009 07:42 |
|
whaam posted:I've been too busy to get out in ages, just starting to find some time now just in time for eternal northern darkness Might try a sunrise or set this weekend I guess, but waking up in the dark and leaving work in the dark is killing me already and it's only December. It sucks, we don't have it as bad here and it is still terrible. --
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2009 05:01 |
|
dunkman posted:I'm going to Hawaii next month and I'm planning on doing some hiking and taking pictures along the way, so no tripod. Take a tripod, even if it is a smaller one they are really useful and if you have a bag then you can probably strap it to it. as for a 70-200 you need to decide what you are wanting to take photos of I think it would be handy and you could keep it in your bag until you needed it.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2009 01:31 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2010 07:22 |
|
Regressor posted:Great job exposing the sky. You use flash on the foreground or is that an HDR? The top one is a manual blend of two exposures, one for the sky and one for the foreground. I used layers and masks in Photoshop to then blend the two exposures.
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2010 03:32 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2010 07:21 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2010 09:03 |
|
One more.
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2010 09:00 |
|
A few from tonight.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2010 08:10 |
|
Interrupting Moss posted:I hate to do it, but I posted 3 images because I wanted feedback on them, I am well aware that one is much stronger than the other 2 but does not mean I cant get feedback on them. Not sure if I have mentioned it here but I feel my stuff is stagnant, I am trying to do new things but it is tough. I find with landscapes it is hard because a lot of it has to do with the location. Going back to locations you have gone to before it is really hard to motivate your self. For these photos I was just out for a walk without really having the intention of taking photos but it was a nice sunset so why not? I am bored with my photos, I really need a larger project to apply my self to but I am having a hard time kicking something off.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2010 22:31 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:That first shot's quite interesting, and it seems the location has enough going on to lend itself to not-landscape photography. I mean if you're bored just try it. I agree, one of the reasons I went was to scout for a good location to shoot river otters that are often there but too many people with dogs around when I was down there.
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2010 01:34 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2010 09:35 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2010 04:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2010 07:42 |
|
One more.
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2010 08:10 |
|
Pano from the weekend.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2010 08:11 |
|
Shooting at f22 or something is comparable to shooting wide open (kind of) yes you will probably loose some quality to diffraction but unless it is a really terrible lens it probably will not cripple your image. Like dik-dik said it is often more important to have a large DOF, although if you are shooting wide then even at f10 you are going to have a pretty large DOF.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2010 08:25 |
|
I use a ND8 filter if I need to knock down the shutter speed and shoot multiple exposures and blend them later which will reduce the amount of kit you will have to bring/carry around. I use the 10-20 a lot but it depends on the scene, not sure on the filter size for the 17-50 but I am assuming it is not the same as the sigma 10-20 (77mm) just get a step up ring so you can use it on both lenses.
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2010 22:50 |
|
I think the saturation is ok but the huge empty mass of black at the bottom is not doing anything. I would try cropping some of that out and see how it looks.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2010 22:33 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2010 18:58 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2010 08:12 |
|
One from the weekend.
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2010 07:40 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2010 08:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 29, 2010 08:01 |
|
This is nice, I have always wanted to go to the East Coast of Canada.
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2010 06:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2010 02:12 |
|
It's been awhile since I have done some landscapes, too long.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2010 08:21 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2010 07:06 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2010 07:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 11:41 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2010 17:22 |