|
Also why does half this forum live in the Pacific Northwest
|
#
¿
May 29, 2021 21:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 19:19 |
|
|
   more expired eeprom stuff
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2021 04:47
|
|
|
i was tthinking of printing these as a pair but havent got around to it
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2021 05:03
|
|
|
 
Twenties Superstar fucked around with this message at 19:47 on Aug 13, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2021 19:44
|
|
|
thank u to everyone who took the time to say something about my picture. while not meant for me i found your comments interesting and i really value the thoughts from folks in here
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2021 01:33
|
|
|
That rocks
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2021 03:35
|
|
|
ic an play this game too
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2021 01:25
|
|
|
xzzy posted:
imo trying to hide the haze is a mistake. other people have pointed out it looks a little crushed. personally i like the subtly shifting tones of the haze. i think it comes of even better in the colour version from the blue wood smoke on muted greens. nice picture in any case
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2021 04:35
|
|
|
personally i think it could have been pulled a bit (hard to say) but the images being much more about the composition of generic elements and light i feel it is undesireable to coomplicate things with whatever logo is on the side of the truck
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2021 17:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2021 06:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2021 03:43
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:good poo poo its the last of that neopan i need to re up  (this is a different film)
|
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2021 05:18
|
|
|
tompepper posted:
|
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2021 06:20
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGq8sqaBVyE
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2021 05:51
|
|
|
what if aesthetics are the subject
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2021 01:23
|
|
|
it must be hard for the judges to choose when all the pictures look the same
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2021 02:05
|
|
|
Jerm324 posted:I feel like you could say this about any type of landscape "genre" if said genre isn't your thing. this is true of course and i dont really care if anybody else likes the photos. as has been pointed out they are meant to be likeable. individually there are many fine photos there i think but when you look at them in aggregate the illusion is totaly dispelled for me. no one artist is distinct enough that you could tell who did what if you shuffled them around. or if you did a google image search for nice mountain landscape or leaves on water or snowy tree picture you could probably swap those in and out and not notice the difference. i think they are all hewing as close as they can to same set of ideal beautiful landscape photos as those that are churned into desktop wallpapers or come heavily watermarked by flickr dads with prosumer hardware. ive seen a lot of photos and ive seen a lot of (actual) landscapes (brag) but nothing in there inspires anything of the grandeur or sense of excitment and adventure of the real thing. like megabound said they remind me more of the dentists office, or the furniture in an airbnb, or a picturesque scene in a video game than a real place. these awards are never given to anybody trying something novel or innovative and as a result they are just a celebration of mediocrity. id like to reward people who have a vision that surprises you and pushes things forward. sure some of the artists are lugging their gear up a mountain side to get their shot but the power of what they see is not captured in their photos where they always stay on the paved trail.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2021 04:23
|
|
|
its tired to say but its a real shame that the risk / reward is so skewed for a little bit of fence hopping down there
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2021 02:27
|
|
|
ive lost track of this conversation also but in general i think nurturing a sense of what your tools can do before you pick them up and use them will make you better and more efficient at doing so. an interesting comment made above regarding photography and the transformation from 3d to 2d (re bobmarleysghosts excellent photos). the idea of translation is essential to photography i think and being able to intellectually grapple with the transformation that occurs between reality and print before you put the viewfinder up to your eye is for me a big part of "the work" of photography
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2021 22:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2021 06:59
|
|
|
theHUNGERian posted:Is it intentionally this much out of focus? i dont always mean to but i like how it looks anyway
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2021 05:40
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2021 05:51
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2022 02:02
|
|
|
thakns 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2022 20:26
|
|
|
i hope it doesnt dispell the illusion but they were taken in bc and the trunks are actually douglas fir!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2022 02:45
|
|
|
That's a real nice one
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2022 04:24
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2022 07:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2022 06:54
|
|
|
thjank u both
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2022 01:14
|
|
|
yeah thats right im almost out unfortunately but its pretty remarkable how chunky that film can be heres a crop from an underexposed shot at 100% i really enjoy the impressionistic quality of it though i dont think im personally deft enough to really make good use of that 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2022 02:37
|
|
|
lovely colours the tracks in the foreground really make this one for me
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2022 02:29
|
|
|
all ur stuff on the last couple pages really clicks for me 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2022 06:45
|
|
|
i would describe that as wooly prettyu cool
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2022 19:58
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2022 08:26
|
|
|
thanks i appreciate that. personally im a little torn on the police tape - there are a few things that i like about them which (imo) is that they work well in the composition, are something a bit dynamic, and they fit in with the concept / theme in general. i think you are right though that maybe it is a bit much. its fortunate that they work on those levels but maybe a simpler more static scene would be better. idk i keep going back and forth the more i look at it with the cactus i m more certain that i like it as is. youre definitely right that it would pop more in colour (the colour is lovely i remember it clearly) its a nice scene but i think a more boring one. i kind of like the supposed subject being an organic foil to the rigid geometry of the scene. its kind of funny. i dont want to overthink it thank you again for the crit i didnt want to be dismissive in my response i thought about it pretty much all day before i wrote back and i think youve really guided me in a productive way
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2022 20:07
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2022 09:24
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2022 11:03
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2022 20:40
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 19:19 |
|
|
Yeah seconded
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2022 08:41
|
|