|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2020 04:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
D40s are more than capable enough, try to not shoot people in straight daylight though, shade is far better. Rather than buying gear, try taking photos of friends first and look hard at the pictures to find out what you like, don't like, and could do better. This thread also typically gives very good and honest feedback.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2023 00:05
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:not sure if this rule of thumb extends .. like you saw that 1:1 above .. the lens is so sharp with such good resolution, I haven’t tested it but I suspect at 1/125 it’s gonna be introducing some shake that might not be noticeable on film. I could be wrong of course (unlikely, you know me) Then why are you destroying the lens' characteristics with lovely fake grain? e: learn how to hold a camera properly
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2023 04:14
|
|
|
Did you add in fake grain again?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2023 20:57
|
|
|
You're turning potentially good photos into bad photos. Do less editing.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2023 22:33
|
|
|
Here's one I took recently.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2023 01:37
|
|
|
Both this and the previous one look too warm to me. Are you adjusting the white balance to be as correct as possible before you grade/desaturate/mess around with the colour sliders? I don't think the previous photo was overexposed and I don't care about the focus or anything. From a technical perspective I think you need to be thinking about the white balance.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2023 21:18
|
|
|
It looks like it's daylight, somewhat shaded by trees. Your camera should be metering better. Have you accidentally set a white balance shift?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2023 22:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
...How long did you spend correcting the curves in that exquisite scan above? Seriously though, it's fine to choose a different white balance but if a modernish digital camera is consistently giving a greenish cast it sounds like there's some issues with the settings.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2023 22:51
|
|