|
Her pores have bright highlights and deep shadows, as well as the small hairs on her face are lit up. You will have to dodge&burn each of these slightly to soften her face up. Also remember that the clarity slider can be very harsh, even when making the smallest adjustments.
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 2, 2024 19:22 |
|
|
8th-snype posted:Not everyone is in as big of a rush as you to cram a cock down their throat.  
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2015 06:59
|
|
|
You oversaturated the skintones while at the same time desaturating the shadows, that's the problem. They also have highlights on their skin indicating sweat/oily skin. This would be fine for a shot of a boxer or athlete, but normal guys just end up looking goony. You'll have to fix that manually with light dodging/burning
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 21:39
|
|
|
I would move her slightly to the left but other than that looks good to me
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
Nice umbrella and purse there agent smith
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
If you crop that to 1:1 or portrait orientation you can get rid of both?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
The portrait thread continues to be the opposite of the landscapes thread
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2015 07:01
|
|
|
The shape of the catch light looks gimmicky even before it could have a chance to become a fad. I'm sorry but even if the light you get from it is great, I would try to minimize that star in the eyes. It's simply distracting because it's the very first thing you notice. Like instead of the model or the product you just see a star and start wondering about why that star is there instead of a pupil. It might work for a very zany neon 80's theme though. Try to shine the background light onto the background instead of through it, It doesn't have to be rgb 255*3 white, because you could fix that in post as long as you have a clearly defined subject. So don't do shallow dof, because having a model's nose out of focus is not great (as in the last photo) and also distracting, even if you do have her eyes in focus. Front facing close up portraits like that should have the facial features in focus and can have the hair and back of the head going out of focus if you are doing shallow dof. I am quite drunk so I might only find out tomorrow if this si good advice or not KinkyJohn fucked around with this message at 21:25 on Apr 22, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2016 21:14
|
|
|
thetzar posted:
I love it. You should probably let her out though.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2016 07:28
|
|
|
Verman posted:I find most maternity stuff on the same level as Russian wedding photography with the miniature groom photoshopped into weird scenes. Holy gently caress you weren't kidding. Googling "Russian wedding photography" gives an endless font for the "I found the best photographer" thread.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
That's some nice light you got there
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 07:23
|
|
|
Maybe the discoloration under her eyes need some slight touch up, but her eyes are fine
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2016 06:39
|
|
|
Great macro photography
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
imo the sepia version makes the subject stand out slightly more whereas the b&w one gets lost in the background? Disclaimer: I am not supporting the use of sepia in general
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 2, 2024 19:22 |
|
|
I only shoot weddings with a canon 500mm f4 Here's an idea: you have your second shooter in close with a wide angle, interacting with and posing people, while you hide in the neighboring property, taking photos with silky smooth backgrounds
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2024 11:24
|
|