|
When I was in Peru I often found that my 70-200 was enough. A lot of birds would let you get real close if you were careful enough not to startle them. Anhima cornuta: A pelican of some sort: Would appreciate an ID on any of these:
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2010 07:21 |
|
|
# ¿ May 3, 2024 12:36 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:Oh man that third one is twice as good as your first one. InternetJunky posted:drat, how close were you? EXIF says 135mm f/2, but that sure is some bokays.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2012 15:26 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2012 18:34 |
|
BeastOfExmoor posted:These appear to be cutouts of Audobon's paintings superimposed on actual photographs? I don't get it (but I am amazed I recognized Audobon's style right off the bat). It's a comment on the dichotomy between old and new ways that people vicariously experience wildlife.
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2012 20:19 |
|
Rot posted:And these guys, hanging out on a lake in the Amazon: That's the hoatzin.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2013 18:52 |
|
|
# ¿ May 3, 2024 12:36 |
|
Pukestain Pal posted:oh give me a break. I don't think anyone on here really needs to explain dof. obviously someone wanted to waste their money and change my avatar. Oh give me a break. I don't think anyone else on here really thought this was a good post to make 8 hours after Dread Head explained what made his shot different. Pukestain Pal posted:photography 101
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2014 00:33 |