|
I've noticed alot of people discussing PRK vs. Lasik. From my reading, PRK is the alternative if you don't have thick enough corneas. All things being equal, if I had a choice between the two, is one "better" than the other? I know the two procedures only differ in cutting/not cutting the flap and recovery time, but does one method provide a better result than the other? I have no issues with the flap being cut, but if it's a one time thing I'd rather put up a bit more cash and get the "better" process done, if i have a choice.
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2010 17:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 10:34 |
|
|
Let me rephrase the question: Other than flap vs no flap, and PRK having a longer recovery time, are there any differences besides cost? Edit: VV Awesome. I could never tell if there were any outcome differences. I've got a consultation coming up and hopefully I can get my eyes sliced open soon. Praesil fucked around with this message at 19:43 on Jun 23, 2010 |
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2010 18:22
|
|