|
AIIAZNSK8ER posted:I would think that with enough practice, this wouldn't be so difficult. He mentioned using small jpeg format. If you take a bunch of small resolution pictures and put them together, do they form a normal full resolution shot eventually? I mean if he does this for clients, I assume that it blows up to a 8x12 nicely. I'd say that's the idea exactly.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2009 06:37 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 20:05 |
|
LuisX posted:Meh, I think it will take 1-3 seconds per frame, so you are looking at 20 to 180 seconds per subject. Which in all honesty not too bad either. On a high-end digital camera, it's definitely not going to take 3 seconds per frame.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2009 15:45 |
|
bobfather posted:Shooting tiny planets is easy by the way. It takes all of about 20 seconds to go fully manual (including manual focus), orient yourself correctly and snap all the shots you need. If you're going to shoot one with a fish, give yourself plenty of overlap so that when you remove the distortion from your images your software has plenty of area to line up. I know they're cliche by this point, but would you mind walking through the process? I've never done it and I bet my sister would find it cool.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2009 14:24 |
|
bobfather posted:Sure. If you're doing a landscape: Haha, I didn't realize it was just a remapped panorama. That's kinda awesome, thanks.
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2009 12:33 |
|
NoneMoreNegative posted:Yerrs, thinking about it, it is a bit of a silly omission - 'if you need it, buy our flash-head for $$$', I suspect.
|
# ¿ Oct 17, 2009 14:12 |