|
Just stock up when sandisk's rebates roll around. They always have some ridiculous prices during the rebate periods eg. extreme iii 16gb for 30~ dollar each.
DaNzA fucked around with this message at 10:02 on Aug 24, 2009 |
#
¿
Aug 24, 2009 09:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 15:50 |
|
|
Sorry if I missed this, but this there a general, dorkroom recommended online/offline place to do large prints? like 11x14 to a few feet.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2010 01:57
|
|
|
Thanks bros, will try and print out a few from each one.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2010 21:17
|
|
|
Mr. Clark2 posted:What is that kind of photography called that makes everything look like really finely detailed scaled models? Sorry if thats vague. 'Making of a smaller government'  http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/4311870364/
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2010 12:14
|
|
|
It might also be the glass, check all the elements and front glass by shining a flashlight through it. I remember seeing a 'crack' in the out of focus blur on one of my old old lens before. It turned out to be a line of fungus on one of the element, and the shape corresponds to the crack I saw. Also I've seen it when there were water droplets on the front element.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2010 20:19
|
|
|
Also check for possible firmware update? Yeah I read that you are only using 1600 but it wouldn't hurt to try. http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/firm-e/eos7d/firmware.html quote:Firmware Version 1.2.1 incorporates the following improvements and fixes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2010 01:00
|
|
|
The water is grossly under exposed while the near pure white feather on the horny ducks are blowing your highlight. It's just a really lovely lighting situation all around. You could probably save it by framing the ducks only and leave the water in the shadow or try exposing for the water and dont give a gently caress about the ducks.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2010 06:40
|
|
|
I had that lens for a while and I don't it's even worth paying money for. Your best starting lens is probably the tamron 17-50, if you can't pay that much then get the 18-55 IS, which is a huge improvement over the non-IS and can be had for about 100 bucks. Save some money and try to get the body by itself for around 200. DaNzA fucked around with this message at 12:27 on Apr 21, 2010 |
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2010 03:11
|
|
|
Anyone know if the sweep panorama mode will out put as a single raw file?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 20, 2010 22:17
|
|
|
chef posted:Any recommendations or things to watch out for on photo scanning services? It's on the same page  http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3307521
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2010 03:45
|
|
|
McMadCow posted:Holy crap, is that the park on Roosevelt? I used to live right there on the corner.  And yep looks like it's Corona Heights Park.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2010 21:30
|
|
|
Because it's actually mpix.com
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2010 01:12
|
|
|
Well the 1200mm is great for enlarging the sun   Click here for the full 1024x760 image.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2010 02:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 15:50 |
|
|
Just remember some people actually like terrible things such as over-used HDR. And how do you know that she isn't just pretending to be happy with the new shoot just like how she was satisfied with your one? Also I think the shot you took was a bit bland and the skin tone was too yellow. And I can see how they'd like the new shoot in a more fancy setting even though it has a terrible shadow from the flash.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2011 23:15
|
|