|
Hey guys whats up.
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2011 16:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 20, 2024 08:29 |
|
|
Not much! Just trying to work out flickr and sorting some photos 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2011 16:44
|
|
|
I want my 7D to look like that 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2011 18:32
|
|
|
thats a good idea man does anyone like drifting? if so y'all should check out my first proper outing with my 7D  http://www.driftworks.com/2011/02/teessideways/
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2011 00:25
|
|
|
I was actually aiming for the flare A lot of people in car scenes seem to be doing it at the moment and I really liked the aesthetic so gave it a go.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2011 00:55
|
|
|
What's so great about it then?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2011 02:39
|
|
|
Holy poo poo the UK price is £1000. Looks really nice though.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2011 02:49
|
|
|
i sold my first 2 photographs today guys 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2011 02:00
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:Here's something to think about - will cameraphones make point and shoots obsolete? Probably eventually.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2011 00:17
|
|
|
Is it possible to build a machine that records something as vector data?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2011 18:00
|
|
|
I mean like a vector image. So a camera that doesn't use pixels? I know this is really stupid btw. But is it possible to some degree?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2011 18:06
|
|
|
Why is that considered good photography? I wish someone had started that WHAT IS ART thread.
Bape Culture fucked around with this message at 22:10 on Feb 27, 2011 |
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2011 22:07
|
|
|
I don't like it at all. Why is that better than some cellphone pic some bro snapped of his gently caress buddy? Intimate/Candid/Loose aesthetic = no effort, no technicality?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2011 23:07
|
|
|
Yeah but literally anyone could do that? I guess I just don't understand it 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2011 23:23
|
|
|
brad industry posted:Who gives a poo poo how technical it is? They're selling a product, and AA's advertising is not exactly what I would call unsuccessful. They made selling basic t-shirts hip, it's genius and it works whether people think it's a "good" photograph or not. I meant the photographer guy whose 'thing' it is. I guess it makes sense as an advertisement if it's cool and grabs attention or whatever. I just don't see the appeal in a photographic sense.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2011 23:35
|
|
|
The AA ad guy shoots for maxim? In the same style?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2011 02:48
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:You should go and take really awesome, legit photos. For $50. Just imagine the looks on their faces. That would be great  Do it guy.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2011 03:13
|
|
|
pwn posted:Or be Not A Literal Child and don't gently caress with other people irl gently caress you.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2011 18:27
|
|
|
I really don't like that window one. The other is nice though.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2011 01:49
|
|
|
What the hell is P? Full auto?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2011 20:29
|
|
|
Sweet. Gonna use it from now on 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2011 20:42
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:For serious? Yeah. I've never actually used it on my 7D. And I thought maybe it was 'creative auto' that people were on about earlier. I don't think my 350D had a 'P'? And if it did I've not used it for years.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2011 21:22
|
|
|
Would it be possible to make a camera that takes 2 exposures at the same time? eg: when I'm panning, sometimes I miss a cool thing that would have owned at a fast shutter speed. My idea is to make it take both pictures at the same time. Would this require 2 sensors?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2011 16:21
|
|
|
Aww it's not as good of an idea as I though. I thought you might be able to siphon off the first part of the exposure or something.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2011 16:57
|
|
|
Sevn posted:But it is still fun to think about CARS! A specific example from last season I have is panning and then a blow out. Obviously it would be cool to have the tyre exploding frozen, but I couldn't because I was panning.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2011 17:04
|
|
|
Wonder if this sort of thing will take off. http://vimeo.com/22134219 It would be pretty cool if it has the performance of that X100 thing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2011 17:17
|
|
|
If only he'd have used a filter.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2011 18:50
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:So I just wanted to plug lensrentals.com. Not only do they get you quality stuff fast, but they take their special requests section of the order form very seriously. Hahaha oh wow that is amazing!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2011 17:14
|
|
|
I saw someone using a crazy rear end 2000fps hd video camera. Called the something gold? Think its cost like 100k. Now my 7d isn't so impressive and I want to shoot in crazy slo-mo haha.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2011 19:11
|
|
|
Augmented Dickey posted:I've always wanted to get the Casio EX-F1, which will do 1200fps. Unfortunately it still goes for $1000+ on ebay Badass. Seems sorta cheap too.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2011 13:00
|
|
|
http://hypebeast.com/2011/05/sasha-grey-neu-sex-book-signing-martha-otero-gallery/ Wow that's weird. I know nothing about portraiture but I like the candid idea I guess.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2011 14:24
|
|
|
Did anyone else see thor and get irritated by the loving wonky horizons and stuff? Really did my head in and I don't know why.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2011 19:36
|
|
|
Watch rubber. Every shot is perfect and would make a great photograph. IMO anyway.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2011 01:43
|
|
|
I loved it. It's pretty pretentious though I guess. Give this a watch and see what you think. If you like it you'll love the rest of the film. http://youtu.be/fTFbXLbv71Y?hd=1
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2011 02:02
|
|
|
That's the letter i
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2011 19:19
|
|
|
Martytoof posted:OK I'm ready for all the "it's so advanced, this entire commercial was shot with one!!" video DSLR commercials to get phased out We don't have them in the UK yet. That's a really good idea.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2011 01:24
|
|
|
What is a Kiev 60?
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2011 00:40
|
|
|
How much roughly?
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2011 00:54
|
|
|
Can you get sexy DOF on a X100?
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2011 14:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 20, 2024 08:29 |
|
|
I have my 7D manual on my phone
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2011 17:04
|
|