Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Defecting to Nine posted:

There's this older guy in NYC who goes around to all the parades and such with one of those. Shoots handheld. loving insane.

Does he have a beard?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Berlusconi is the definition of :smug:

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

I know how much you all love Ken Rockwell but my god this is some of his best work yet

http://kenrockwell.com/tech/everything-sucks.htm


Hes just trolling us now

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

For those who like gear porn check out Vincent LaForet's latest blog post.

Its about his latest video/photo shoot with 1D IV's and a whole lot of other professional gear (lots of video stuff)

http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2010/02/24/so-what-does-an-hdslr-hybrid-shoot-look-like/

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Rated PG-34 posted:

That clip is awesome. This isn't an uncommon occurrence I'm sure. I just recently sat through a slideshow of atrocious wedding photos, where it was terribly evident that the photographer had messed up the ISO setting. She 'corrected' her mistake using b/w and film grain filters :psypop:. It also seemed pretty apparent that she lacked technical skills regarding aperture settings and such, although she was 'skilled' enough to do selective desaturation :barf:. The collection was also minimally edited and consisted of over 600 shots, many of the same scene even when one frame was obviously better. Suffice to say, it was a terribly boring slideshow. I didn't have the heart to tell him that it all looked like poo poo, and restrained myself from strangling his roommate who was awed by the 50s look (b/w filter :rolleyes:) and made comparisons to Renoir :what:

I really feel sorry for the people that get photographers like this. All they have to do is show a select bunch of photos that look good. If you have no idea about photography then you wouldn't really be able to tell outside of those select few that look good.

I guess thats why you say you should ask for the photos from the last 3 shoots they did including all the different parts of the wedding.

Good thing that the judge thoroughly shut her down. She seemed pissed acting like she loving knew when she was obviously a retard. I own both their lenses and trying to use that 70-300 would be impossible unless its sunny as hell. Plus its a poo poo lens.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

unleash the unicorn posted:

I hope this hasn't been posted before, but the Boston Globe has set up a website that's dedicated to news photography.

https://www.boston.com/bigpicture

Some pretty cool stuff there.

Its very very old news? Honestly its all over the web. Even here in Australia it gets linked to very often.

I mean its not crap (one of the best sites for news photos)...but how haven't you seen this before?

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

I watched a pretty drat interesting documentary last night about a photographer named Murray Fredericks.

He's an Australian guy who for 5 weeks of the year goes out to Lake Eyre in South Australia which is basically a loving huge salt lake in the middle of nowhere. Its pretty drat inhospitable and barren. But it does make for some amazing photography.

He took with him a 8x10 format camera to take a series of landscapes as well as other photography gear to take some amazing time lapse stuff.

The website for the doco is here with a trailer.
http://www.saltdoco.com/index.htm
I think its on ABC2 this sunday for any Australians.

See some of the large format photos here - http://www.murrayfredericks.com.au/currentexhibition-lake-eyre0607.asp

And theres some more in other areas.

Its amazing how looking at a landscape of "nothing" can be so stunning.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Phat_Albert posted:

On a similar note, did anyone see the piece that the Today show did on Ann Curry and her photography? Its kind of cool to see a celebrity (even a relatively minor one) who's actually into photography.

Ben Folds is also into photography

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLu8wTVho8Q

Has his own dark room and a load of film cameras.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

This isn't the thread to debate this stuff. Move on or go to D&D.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

ease posted:

I am curious tho, do they just focus manually with the 5d and 7d?

Yes. For someone that actually has a crew you would have a focus puller who pretty much just keeps stuff in focus and makes sure its all going alright.

Which is why lenses like these http://photocinenews.com/2010/02/18/zeiss-unveils-new-dslr-cine-lens/ are much more handy for getting spot on focus. You can set your mark and hit it whereas its much harder with a normal lens where the markings are usually quite narrow and harder to pinpoint.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Bojanglesworth posted:

Too much money, not enough brains. That is pretty much the official moto of where I live (Washington, DC area.) The last wedding I shot was a Korean (read: rich people) wedding, as I am just hanging out waiting for the ceremony to start a guy wanders over to me to ask me what type of camera I have, then proceeds to show me his 1d mkIV and 24-70 L, but admits he doesnt know how to use it, and THEN asks me if he can borrow my flash for a bit because he doesn't own one. I wish I had money to blow one whatever I wanted regardless of cost.

Eh who cares. Its not your money. Honestly may as well spend your money whilst you have it. Besides they might eventually learn to use it....its a hobby.

Its really no different to all the old men who drop a few grand on the newest golf clubs each year and still shoot +40. So what. They are enjoying themselves (well golf is a oval office of a sport to enjoy) but whatever.

Or people who drop 10 grand on scuba diving equipment

Or people who spend thousands of dollars on model trains

Or spending a 20 grand on a bunch of pinball machines and pool table in their games room.

Its all relative. My dad was buying a new car a few years back and was tossing up between the sporty BMW or to just get a corolla and I said get the BMW because he may as well enjoy one car in his life before he gets too old and its not like he has a mortgage to pay off or anything.

If I had the money I would probably buy a 600mm and 1DmkIV and I would say I'm not ready for that. But gently caress it. Would be awesome fun.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

diarrhea for girls posted:

Welcome back buddy.

I had one of those Mavica FDs as well, it was actually a pretty awesome camera for what it was but the reliability of floppy disks left a lot to desire. I remember them sending me some promo materials about the amazing new CD-R using Mavica and my mind was blown.

Give it a few years and people will start buying up lovely digital cameras for aesthetic reasons. Like cheap film cameras now.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Watching cameras get destroyed by wayward shots at the world cup is glorious. The ones triggered remotely and positioned behind the goal.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

It happened in one of the earlier games as well. I think there was more destruction!

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

rcman50166 posted:

Oh dear, it's beaten the XSi and 5D...:ohdear:

Well a lot of the people who are spread out between SLRs will also have a iPhone as well.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Its really awesome doing it looking down like in Vertigo.

Works so well

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

AIIAZNSK8ER posted:

Does anyone have recomendations for good documentaries on photography?

War Photographer. I think its on Youtube.

James Nachtwey's one. Has a camera mounted directly on his shutter button.

Plus the poo poo he photographs is really raw and he is an amazing guy.

(plus I pretty much love his work)

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Combat Pretzel posted:

Hrm. I wasn't too sure before because of his accent. He sounds as arrogant British as you can be (at least to my Belgian ears).

Well, no use then. They're somewhat cheaper than that German online shop I'm always ordering from, but import taxes would jack DigitalRev's prices over the German shop's ones.

Whenever i buy from DigitalRev (To Australia) They always factor in the taxes before I checkout. So I won't be hit with anything coming through customs.

I've bought a bunch of things from there including my 7D. I think they are great. At least compared to local Australian prices even with the digitalrev warranty.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

What the gently caress is a goober

The other one is pretty funny - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmIk89VCJzc

From 1:20 onwards.

Guess what lady. Thats just what the paparazzi do! And they dont get arrested. I bet she reads lots of trashy magazines as well.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Australians always say nick-on but I dont think anyone actually knows the proper way to say it.

Nor do we give a poo poo.

Unless an american says nigh kon then we will just argue for the sake of it. loving americans.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Ive never realised how many drat jewish holidays they are until I started buying stuff from B&H. Its like every second day they have a holiday.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

That 400 is pretty heavily weathersealed though no?

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Get people to stop being interested in people at the drat airport or doing some shopping.

I have now watched a whole bunch of paparazzi youtube videos after watching that....its really bizaare.

Hugh Grants ones are pretty good.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

brad industry posted:

What's atrocious to me about that cover is the type. Dear god who the hell designed that.


I liked this guest blog post by John Loengard:

http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2010/archives/11324

What the gently caress
http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/3leibovitz1.jpg

Are they doing that without a harness D:

I'm not scared of heights but that would freak me the gently caress out.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

This is cool. Ability to change focus on an image AFTER you've taken it.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/23/adobe-shows-off-plenoptic-lenses-that-let-you-refocus-an-image-a/


dunkman posted:





You literally own exactly the same gear as me. NICE WORK BRO

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

This is pretty awesome

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/go...otographer.html

I want to know if the lens survived!

I only saw it because apparantly the cigar guy in the crowd on the right has become some sort of meme and Time magazine posted on their twitter.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

My grandpa is 86 and has never ever used a computer.

We bought him a mobile phone about 5 years ago for when he's in his car and stuff but he used that once and never touched it again.

Cable TV and a big flatscreen is the limit of his technology.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Thats a "this must be stolen" kind of deal. Or deceased estate or something like that.


In other news Facebook has increased the the quality of its photos. Up to 2048 pixels now or something and the ability to make prints is being developed or something Expecting it to taking more bites out of flickr eventually.

Heres an example of the better quality

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=441929318950&set=a.431705768950.218732.23497828950

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

guidoanselmi posted:

low earth orbit isn't very far away. the space station is 173 miles away and if you run the calcs for how well you can resolve a point source from a distance (in space, darkness, etc) you'd be really surprised.

math stuff below:
Threshold Intensity = Radiated Power/Surface Area = R. Power / (4 Pi dist^2). E = planck constant * speed of light / wavelength (planck & speed of light are constants & wavelength is between 400-600 nm). Use an arbitrary threshold intensity, eg human ocular cone cell will trigger on 5 photons.

so assuming a 10 W red light bulb:

5 = 10/(h c/600 nm) / (4 pi r^2) and solve for r.

god im bored


What the gently caress does that even mean

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

So how far way could you say see a normal 60W globe or whatever is in a house?

Its been 5 years since I touched much in the way of maths.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

trueblue posted:

This is pretty cool.

Guy gets lost at sea, takes photos, loses the camera. He gets rescued, the camera washes up 4 years later and he gets the photos back. The full album is here.

Bizaare the guy who found it thought it was that camera.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Casull posted:

The car looks horrendously out-of-focus :v:

So how did you guys get into photography anyway? I bought my XT a year ago on a whim from a goon (UGAmazing, to be exact) and didn't do anything with it for four months until I picked it up randomly one day and went shooting. Then I started reading up on shutter speed/aperture/ISO, and from there it quickly became into this obsession I have today.

My dad used to shoot a decent amount with an SLR and I kind of watched but didn't understand. Then we went overseas and he had just bought a 300D which was pretty cool at the time as it was the first DSLR I had seen.

Then our house got robbed a few years later and new for old insurance policy gave us a few new DSLR's including a 400D which I took so I had my own.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Maybe you could post some of your favourites here and get a vote on the best for entering?

Whats the link to the competition?

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

The thing with this competition is due to the fact theres a large entry fee per photo and a decent prize for first there will be some seriously good entries I think.

Which means you will need something that will make everyone who see's it go "wow". I like the photos you've posted but I don't think their gonna win a comp like this. I think a couple stand out more but could use with a little bit of work in post.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

psylent posted:

The :) makes it less bitter. And what the gently caress is is with a manager writing like a 14 year old girl on a phone?

There are some very senior people in some very wealthy organisations who literally cannot turn on a computer.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

A5H posted:

Yeah. I've never actually used it on my 7D. And I thought maybe it was 'creative auto' that people were on about earlier. I don't think my 350D had a 'P'? And if it did I've not used it for years.

It automatically sets both aperture and shutter speed whilst letting you decide on ISO and Flash and other options.

Like one step of automation above Av and Tv. Im pretty sure your 350D would have had it. Hell I've got 20 year old canon's with it and my 400D did.

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

This is quite interesting.

Want to see how it works

http://re35.net/index.html

Even if it does turn out to be a gimmick

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

spog posted:

It's a shame it is an April Fools joke

http://translate.google.com.au/tran...s%26prmd%3Divns

I can imagine an awful lot of photographers got their ponytails all twisted up in excitement.

Damnit!

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

PREYING MANTITS posted:

It's being reported that photojournalists Tim Hetherington and Chris Hondros were killed in Libya today.

Hetherington was co-director of "Restrepo" and Hondros was a Robert Capa Gold Medal recipient for his coverage of the conflict in Iraq. Apparently other PJs were injured in the same attack but their names haven't been released yet. Sad news.

These guys did some really phenomenomal work. I suggest everyone go check out some of their photos. Theres stuff they only just shot in the last few days :(

http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2011/04/20/2-great-photographers-lost-today-in-libya-doing-what-they-loved-to-do/

Sad stuff

Fists Up fucked around with this message at 01:40 on Apr 21, 2011

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fists Up
Apr 9, 2007

Shmoogy posted:

That isn't too surprising, there are probably pretty strict guidelines about how many copies of an image there can be until it's given clearance, and he probably isn't given a lot/any time at all to edit.

Also photo journalists often shoot in jpeg. Gotta get that poo poo out ASAP.

BeastOfExmoor posted:

I really hope that they release more than just that one photo from that occasion, at least in my lifetime. I suppose he probably wasn't playing "wedding photographer" during the whole operation, but he's got to have some really amazing images.

Whilst not that scene if you follow his flickr theres loads of interesting stuff uploaded daily.'

EDIT: Actually there are a few more from the Osama thing.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply