|
Martytoof posted:Adobe's adobe abode.
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2009 22:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:03 |
|
|
Helmacron posted:I think if you can microwave a D3
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2009 22:20
|
|
|
It must have been that UV protector he had on there
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2009 23:48
|
|
|
I just downloaded this. It's pretty neat, it goes through all of your photos and graphs the number of times you've used each focal length, aperture, ISO, and shutter speed. Apparently I love 28mm equiv, ISO 800 and 1/60th sec exposure. It only tabulates jpg though  Anyone know of something similar that can get EXIF data from RAWs?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2010 06:57
|
|
|
psylent posted:
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2010 16:13
|
|
|
New aerial photos of 9/11 released. Some of these are just unbelievable. I can't even imagine what was going through the photographer's mind.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2010 06:06
|
|
|
Wait, only 5 images survived? A very kind deed performed by the Spaniard, but the lady seems a little over excited about getting a grant total of 5 pictures back. Especially if one of them was shot with the horizon at a 10 degree angle.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2010 23:56
|
|
|
trueblue posted:What is apparently a hilarious video. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2010 11:40
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:We already have a Ken Rockwell of something awful.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2010 03:22
|
|
|
When are people going to realize that a snuggie is just wearing a robe backwards?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2010 12:05
|
|
|
DanTheFryingPan posted:Will phones and compact cameras converge?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2010 12:48
|
|
|
orange lime posted:With lenses that maintain a constant aperture, what is actually occurring is that the designers have made a conscious choice to limit the aperture's opening at the short end in the interests of sharpness. Your 70-200 f/2.8 could theoretically be a 1.4 at the short end, but it would be hazy and soft if not outright uncorrected.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2010 07:03
|
|
|
RangerScum posted:the blind black KKK leader from the Chapelle Show.
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2010 01:52
|
|
|
Augmented Dickey posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3273679
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2010 05:28
|
|
|
Helmacron posted:Does anybody know of any instances where someone is prosecuted and convicted of photos they've taken not of illegal acts, but whilst doing an illegal act. For example, someone prosecuted from posting online, photos of urbex? Anyone heard of any cases?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2010 10:18
|
|
|
It's time for another round of What Would You Take? I'm going to spend a few days hiking around around Huashan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Hua. What gear would you take? I have available: 5d2 450d/Xsi Tamron 18-270 Sigma 10-20 Canon 35/2 Canon 50/1.8 Canon 135/2 tripod Major considerations are weight, bulk, and obviously taking pictures.
|
|
#
¿
May 28, 2010 00:04
|
|
|
spf3million posted:It's time for another round of What Would You Take? I'm going to spend a few days hiking around around Huashan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Hua. What gear would you take? I have available:
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2010 02:11
|
|
|
I don't know, for me it was before as I tried to hand hold for 3 shots, then I tried setting it down on a ledge, then said gently caress it and bought a $30 tripod. 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2010 17:12
|
|
|
How the hell do you grab phorum posts from the new flickr? I found the HTML but no [img][/img] links... anyone figure this out?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2010 05:48
|
|
|
Why the gently caress does everyone add an extra e to the end of lens? I can let a few typos pass without comment but jesus, it's spelled "lense" so often that I'm questioning whether it's actually spelled "lens" at all. Am I actually the idiot who's misspelling it all the time?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2010 04:44
|
|
|
Helmacron posted:I know it sounds like an insane point of view, but whenever this topic comes up, I always get to thinking about it all again and I know, I absolutely know that I would prefer to live in a world where photography is illegal.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2010 23:15
|
|
|
Speaking of calibration, my laptop came with a built in hueyPRO. When I run it, I have to close the laptop and it takes a minute or two. Any idea how this works? I assume it uses the webcam somehow but there's no way it would be able to see anything on the screen except for maybe the very top of the monitor.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2010 03:28
|
|
|
brad industry posted:What kind of laptop has a Huey built in? I bet the sensor is somewhere on the keyboard and closing it puts it close enough to read the screen like a normal one would.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2010 03:32
|
|
|
Helmacron posted:Whilst I could probably fit some more in, I have just now filled two notebooks with photo ideas. I thought it would be a good idea if I got into uni. I could just catalogue them, and I wouldn't have to have on the ball creativity, I could just mix and match my previous ideas to fit anything.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2010 14:14
|
|
|
dakana posted:Not exactly "fun stuff", but I don't know where else to put this.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2010 05:36
|
|
|
Dread Head posted:Russians in probably the first (documented) digital editing of photos back in 1987 (I think Photoshop came out in 1990), pretty crazy. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2010 05:24
|
|
|
dunkman posted:I'm having a huge slugfest over in SA-Mart with the host of my photo gallery domain (Tfatf.com).
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2010 18:28
|
|
|
I just watched City of God. For those who haven't seen it, I highly recommend it. It's about a kid who grows up in a slum of Rio de Janeiro and wants to become a photographer instead of a hoodlum.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2010 17:27
|
|
|
kefkafloyd posted:It's easy to outsell Canon and Nikon in the mirrorless market when they haven't even entered it yet.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2010 03:36
|
|
|
So I just went on a little photo outing with a friend and he asked for all of the pictures after we got back. I gave him unedited 500kb copies of everything. Then he posted the good ones (and some not so good ones) on his facebook. What would Jesus do in this situation? I know he doesn't mean anything by it, he just wants his friends and family to see where he's been. And I know I can improve most of them with a little post processing and all of our mutual friends will know I shot everything when I clean them up and post them, but still... it feels like plagiarism and I don't like it 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2010 14:45
|
|
|
I guess I do care that by not giving me credit, someone is offhandedly claiming something that is mine as his own creation. Would I be alone in this feeling? Maybe I'm being a big girl. Now that I think about it, I post my pictures online because I like getting positive feedback about them. Why does anyone else? -ok aside from when looking for work or when asking for critique. My thinking behind not processing them first is that it'd be even more like plagiarism if I gave out edited versions. I know, easy solution is just don't give them out in the first place. Didn't intend to whine about it, just thought some of you may have shared similar experiences. e: l33tc4k30fd00m posted:Yeah really, in a similar way... Sometimes people take the photos I've taken of them from flickr and upload them to their profiles, there's nothing wrong with that really, they're not claiming to own them or anything, they just want people to see. I think it's quite flattering. spf3million fucked around with this message at 17:03 on Nov 29, 2010 |
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2010 17:00
|
|
|
I think everyone reacts differently to different teaching styles. I see what McMadCow is saying about working your rear end off for every bit of praise you get. I don't think there's much a teacher can say if a photo is just boring. Students should know that the standard suggestions for a boring photo are along the lines of add a dynamic subject or look at it in a unique way.. something like that. I think when there is a right and wrong answer, then the teacher should be able to recommend possible ways of fixing a bad submission, but when it comes to artistic critique beyond the basics of exposure, I think it is very difficult to make useful recommendations for every boring photo/painting/sculpture/whatever. I guess the teacher's job should be to get the most out of his/her students and each teacher will have a different way of going about it. Some will be nice and offer suggestions and some students will respond to that, others will be harsh about it and maybe that will work for some others. I agree with ZoCrowes that the teacher should help students along when they are stuck or in a rut but I don't really have a problem with the guy saying that this photo is boring and that photo doesn't work without necessarily offering ways of making each one better.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2010 22:59
|
|
|
http://www.sportsshooter.com/special_feature/student_contest-06/souffle.html One of the comments on Anthony Souffle's portfolio was, "Yeah, it looks like, ya know, it came out of professional camera". 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2010 05:59
|
|
|
Penpal posted:Does anyone have the link for the guy demonstrating pictures from a broken lens? I'm googling all sorts of poo poo and I can't find it! Google, "smashed front element"
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2010 20:28
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:This week's 'The big picture' is amazing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2010 07:49
|
|
|
dunkman posted:Post your tax-refund-irresponsible-photography-related-purchase you wish to make with it: spf3million fucked around with this message at 06:21 on Jan 14, 2011 |
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2011 06:17
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:To be fair the M5 is the Xbox of Leicas.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2011 18:20
|
|
|
Someone posted a comment on one of the DigitalRev youtubes saying it's the Top Gear of photography. I'm inclined to agree with them.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2011 07:25
|
|
|
Yeehaw McKickass posted:If anyone should be upset, it's Jaguar. The print shows nothing of the photo's original artistic merit. I understand copyright, but poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2011 16:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:03 |
|
|
Anybody seen the Looxcie bluetooth video camera? Kind of an appealing idea, having a camera always recording - you hit a button to record the previous 30 seconds or something. I'm thinking it'd be cool as a still camera for those times when you wished you had a camera. Granted the sensor/lens is likely completely poo poo but in good light, maybe it would be usable...?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2011 02:18
|
|