Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
SquallStrife
Jan 20, 2009

"The Goon" by Metanaut.
If you're going to charge $3000 to shoot a wedding, you should probably know how to work a camera:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/872387/couple-sues-over-disastrous-wedding-photos

quote:

The collection of photos taken by Gareth Bowers, of Fresh Images, showed people with their heads chopped off, random close-ups of vehicles and inattentive wedding guests, UK media report.

Not to mention a gamut of under/over exposed shots.

*facepalm*

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SquallStrife
Jan 20, 2009

"The Goon" by Metanaut.

pwn posted:

Are the photos in the article among the 22, or are they from the whole shoot?

I shudder to think of how bad the failures were, if the published photos are among the keepers...

More linkage, with more examples: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-close-ups.html

It doesn't actually say that the examples are among the 22...

Shameful none the less.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply