|
Solomon Grundy posted:This sounds like a job for a consumer lawyer. Paging Sam Glover. Not my specific area, but here is my sense: I think she can return the car and refuse their changed terms (a counteroffer to the sales & financing agreements, really), or keep the car and accept them. She might have to pay them something for the two-week use. Check the paperwork she already has to see if this is covered. If it is not, it is negotiable. This is why you should always get your own financing before going to the dealership. If the dealership can (a) beat your own financing and (b) actually close the loan before you walk out the door, great. If not, you know what you have. Final thought: 4,000 miles in two weeks? Seriously?
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2010 05:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 07:53 |
|
|
Han Solo posted:Do I have any legal basis to sue the perfect pull up company? If you want a new pull-up bar, you should send it in for a warranty replacement.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2010 00:25
|
|
|
woozle wuzzle posted:There's no legal claim... it's a private reference. They could say you wore the wrong style of pants and therefore they cannot recommend you as a tenant. Actually, this sort of reference may be governed by consumer credit reporting laws like the FCRA and state equivalents.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2013 00:51
|
|