Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Meal time




Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Alctel posted:




These are great, what kit/lighting did you use?

I used a 7D + MPE-65 + 580exII for mine, taken at 1:1, I usually use that or a Tamron 90mm for the bigger stuff.

Just taken this at 4:1

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Alctel posted:

I would LOVE the MPE-65 , but apparently it's a real bastard to use well. Nice pic!

Hardest thing sometimes is trying to find in the viewfinder what you are actually trying to shoot.
For those unaware the mpe-65 unlike all/most other lenses has a maximum working distance as well as the usual minimum.
Maximum WD is 101mm, which is a 1:1 shot
Minimum WD is 41mm, which is 5:1

The canon 100mm macro by comparison focuses at a maximum of infinity down to a 1:1 shot, where I think the WD is 150mm.
Yeah so think of your canon macro at 1:1, go another 50mm towards the target and that is where the mpe-65 starts.

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Whitetail, an aussie original but into NZ now.
Noticed it hanging from my shorts as I stood up.

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

I've used combinezm before. It works fairly well if you get the shots right.
Here is a quick tutorial with it
http://www.digitalgrin.com/showthread.php?t=61316

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011


wool carder bee by Raikyn, on Flickr


Bee in Flight by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 08:03 on Feb 5, 2012

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

I forgot to put a diffuser on my flash when I went out,still not too bad.


347C0006-sml by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011


Bee by Raikyn, on Flickr


jumper1 by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 05:22 on Sep 29, 2012

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Wool Carder Bee

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Something else with a mp-e 65
spider feeding

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Spring is here :)


Spring!! by Raikyn, on Flickr


Butterfly by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 02:17 on Sep 7, 2013

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Bought a new flash, just waiting on diffusers


First shots


whitetail by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Went for these two
http://www.ebay.com/itm/321462128643?_trksid=p2059210.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/271619381338?_trksid=p2059210.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Will probably use both together, and I've seen many people use a 3rd or 4th layer of diffusion as well. Hopefully just 2 layers will be enough for me, but they are quite harsh.

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Crane Fly


crane fly by Raikyn, on Flickr

Lighting still harsh, no diffusers yet.

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

First set of diffusers turned up today


blowfly by Raikyn, on Flickr


fly by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 06:43 on Oct 29, 2014

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Another crane fly, now with added diffusion


crane fly by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Some from today


spider by Raikyn, on Flickr


macro by Raikyn, on Flickr


fly wing by Raikyn, on Flickr


bee by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Hi everyone




edit:

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 07:50 on Nov 21, 2014

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

McCoy Pauley posted:

Thanks for the information -- that's all very helpful.

How important is internal focusing (like on the Tamron 60) vs. something that extends out (like the 90). I feel like I would end up banging into things with the front of the lens on something that didn't do internal focusing, or at least casting shadows with the front of the lens when fully extended, but maybe it's not that much of a problem.

Also, is it important to have aperture ring on the lens, so that I can control that manually instead of through the camera? If I wanted to use extension tubes with a macro lens, I assume I'd have no way to adjust the aperture electronically, and would need have a ring on the lens, right? Is that something I should look for, like on the older Sigma 105.

I've had no issue with the Tamron 90 extending as when doing macro with it I'm always in manual focus(well 95% of the time)

To set the aperture on a lens you can put the lens on normally, set aperture, press the DOF preview button, and while keeping the button pressed remove the lens. The lens will then be set to whatever aperture you've decided.

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 00:49 on Nov 24, 2014

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

spongepuppy posted:


^^^ Doesn't this only work for systems with electronically-actuated irises? Nikon lenses all have mechanical aperture levers, so they're always closed when you remove the lens from the camera body.

Yeah sorry 'bout that, I've no idea on the intricacies of nikon systems.


Wool Carder Bee by Raikyn, on Flickr


bug by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Anubis posted:


If I wanted to try and build a cheap halfway decent rig mostly out of the glass we already own, what would people recommend adding to the list below and would you recommend doing a twin lens reverse setup or buying a close up lens for an already owned piece of glass? I'd be shooting with a D60 or D70 depending on the day.

Current lenses
Sigma 150-500mm 5-6.3
Sigma 50-200mm 4-5.6
Canon 17-55mm F/2.8
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 55-250 4-5.6

You should be able to give the reverse lens thing a try for cheap.
Either reverse the 50mm directly onto the camera, or else mount the 50 and reverse a zoom onto it.
Not sure entirely, I looked into it long ago, but then just decided to buy a macro lens

Caterpillar


caterpillar by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Yeah , also been on a macro kick for a few weeks.


On the grape vine by Raikyn, on Flickr



Raikyn fucked around with this message at 07:55 on Dec 6, 2014

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Couple of shots of a small mantis.

Taken at about 2:1


praying mantis by Raikyn, on Flickr


mantis by Raikyn, on Flickr

Edit:

Had a go at stacking, some parts OOF, but oh well


moth by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 02:11 on Jan 3, 2015

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Tried another stacking attempt, stuffed up the legs a bit, but it might have moved as well


Whitetail Spider by Raikyn, on Flickr

plus a normal shot


whitetail by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 11:28 on Jan 7, 2015

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Had something nibbling on me as I was taking photos


mosquito by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

From what i've seen in the 90-110 range the 5 popular choices (canon, nikon, sigma, tamron, tokina ) are fairly similar in regards to image quality and are all f2.8

From there it comes down to additional features and price and what you want from the lens eg. focus speed, stabilisation, build quality.

The sigma 105 does have a good rep though, and for macro it would a definite upgrade.

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

From the last few days


mosquito by Raikyn, on Flickr


wool carder bee by Raikyn, on Flickr


wool carder bee by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Another thing to consider is that the Tamron besides the slow AF is also quite noisy on AF, so it can scare thing away with that as well.
Not an issue if MF though.

Pluses for the Sigma would be internal focus and slighty better working distance.


A mantis


mantis by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Antz at about 3.5:1


ant by Raikyn, on Flickr


ant by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

And a few more


ant clean up by Raikyn, on Flickr


ants by Raikyn, on Flickr


ant pair by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

toggle posted:

These are great. Are you using a reversing ring on them?



No, using the canon mp-e 65 macro lens for these

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Also don't try to go too far at once.

Between manual focus techniques, using flash/or not, camera settings, patience trying not to scare live stuff, it can be hard enough at 1:2 or 1:1

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Quick shot of a moth


moth by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

A before and after shot


before and after by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011


Nocturnal insect by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

I'd love to get a focus stack rig setup, but time/money..

A couple from today


mantis by Raikyn, on Flickr


butterfly by Raikyn, on Flickr


Wool Carder Bee by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Another mosquito, taken at 5:1


Mosquito , Blood Sucker by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

Wouldn't be worried about it being manual, I'm always on manual with the mt-24ex if I'm at more than 1:1


The Hunter by Raikyn, on Flickr


spider vs mosquito by Raikyn, on Flickr

Raikyn fucked around with this message at 06:48 on Apr 13, 2015

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011

:(

Yeah once you start taking photos I find there are 2 things that seem to missing legs/or feet.

Jumping spiders and seagulls

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Raikyn
Feb 22, 2011


whitetail spider by Raikyn, on Flickr


mantis by Raikyn, on Flick

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply