Aeronautical Insanity: switching to secondary tolerances

Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Automotive Insanity > Aeronautical Insanity: switching to secondary tolerances

keykey: Mar 28, 2003; Â Â Â Â Â

The A-Team Van posted:

Voting 5 for this post alone

SR-71 PICS

I drive by one of those every day on my way to work. http://tinyurl.com/ykzgcp7

Also, for true aeronautical insanity, there's this little bastard:

ME163 Komet

The t-stoff/c-stoff mixture essentially made them flying bombs since the injection units were known to leak fuel.

keykey fucked around with this message at 22:17 on Mar 8, 2010

# ¿ Mar 8, 2010 22:06

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 5, 2024 09:11

keykey: Mar 28, 2003; Â Â Â Â Â

CornHolio posted:

Fun fact: That particular SR71, #960, flew more combat missions (342) than any other. Imagine where that titanium has been

That's it, next time I take my son there, I'm dry humping it. I would have then dry humped near space by proxy. :allears:

# ¿ Mar 9, 2010 06:41

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Automotive Insanity > Aeronautical Insanity: switching to secondary tolerances