Good luck kids. 12 hours and our pain will start, 63 hours for it to end. Also why does my bar testing site want hand writers to show up half an hour before computer takers? Does that seem odd to anyone?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2010 06:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 19:11 |
gently caress all y'all and your easy bar exams. Alaska has mandatory ~40% failure rate. Also, our first question was an hour long essay on AKRCP 14(B)(1)(d)(iii)(x). Christ that was painful. I almost guessed the right rule too. I nailed the other two hour long essays and the two MPTs though so meh.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2010 03:18 |
Jew Bear posted:My friend's hubby just transferred from Valpo to Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis (incoming 2L). From this thread, I gather that either means he's not totally boned or he'll be making $14/hr as a Costco clerk rather than $10/hr as a barista. Several big firms hire their 2L summer associates out of their 1L summer associate pool, and as a result extend offers to all their 2L summer associates. It will also get your foot in the door for a clerkship if you can land in the right DA/PD office. The consensus is do anything. Firm's 1L associate > DA/PD > "externing" for a judge > research assistant for a prof > WoW and classes. Edit: To put this advice into context: I just told a friend of mine who's about to begin at Rutgers that if he didn't land a summer associate position to quit after 1L.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2010 08:01 |
Man, today we got loving nailed with 75% of a property essay about Lis Pendens. I vaguely remembered that I head about it once, but had no clue what it was about. Exactly zero people knew a drat thing about it, and it was the subject of most of our essay. Jesus Christ. BarBri didn't even mention it, neither in the state portion nor the national portion. Luckily they gave enough context where I was able to fairly accurately guess the rule to some degree, but a ton of people just randomly guessed poo poo and totally got it wrong. God I love guessing correctly when there's a 40% failure rate. And now to see to my liver. BigHead fucked around with this message at 03:35 on Jul 30, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2010 03:26 |
J Miracle posted:(3) am president of an animal law group Please tell me that 100% of your efforts are dedicated to the argument "Hey man birds are people too." Or that the framers intended animals to have rights because bears have the right to arms.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2010 23:17 |
Holland Oats posted:The Brooklyn Ikea has an average 1 1/2 star review on Google so apparently it's an awful place. 1 1/2 stars is pretty high class for Brooklyn.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2010 23:57 |
CaptainScraps posted:This year I'm just going to pop the cases into Westlaw and steal the headnotes. Every single 1L case is in Wikipedia, and most of the rest of the cases are as well. I didn't even buy the textbooks when I figured that out.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2010 06:11 |
jake1357 posted:What about the rest of the materials in the casebook? The commentary and practice questions, etc 100% of case books are 100% useless. The sooner you realize this the better you will do on exams. Buy hornbooks and a spare Convisors and you will learn 100% more than you would ever learn from the lovely casebooks that the for-profit lawschool hawks to you every three months. What in the hell do you think the commentary actually adds to the casebook that you can't find anywhere else? A hornbook is all commentary without the useless drivel. Hooray you just got top quartile. jake1357 posted:Also, what do you do when you get called on in class and need to direct the professor to where your answer came from? "198 U.S. 215 at 221" isn't very helpful when the rest of the class is using a casebook with the page numbers edited out with an abridged version of the case. The law professors aren't there to teach you the law. They exist (for the most part) to teach you some antiquated poo poo that has 100% nothing to do with anything. If they call on you, say "pass" and move on with your life. If you are compelled to answer, then read a hornbook beforehand and answer based on what the law is. The facts of Spivey v Bataglia are totally irrelevant to anything other than the question of "what are the facts of Spivey v Bataglia." They will not come into play or be in any way relevant on your exam, the bar exam, or private practice. Why do you feel you need to be relevant during in-class discussion? So you can earn a cookie while the professor fawns over you? Who gives a gently caress, you're not there for cookies, you're there to burn $150k on a useless education. You need to become educated, not suck their dick any more than you already are. I don't understand where people get the notion that law school teaches you the law. It doesn't, and the professors don't, and you won't learn it there. Quit pretending to try. 1L (and most of 2L/3L) year teaches you absolutely nothing unless you can remember stuff until you take the MBE. After that, the law school certainly doesn't care about your learning experience unless you're in a clinic and/or trial practice and/or ADR and/or rarely 1L legal writing (highfive samglover). There are many fun classes during 2L and 3L but all were equally irrelevant. Grammar Fascist posted:I disagree with this (that textbooks aren't necessary because you can get all the needed info from Wikipedia/Westlaw/outlines/hornbooks). I know several professors who get very angry when it is obvious to them on an exam that students were relying on outside materials that weren't covered in class. That makes sense because it's basically telling the professor that he/she didn't do a good enough job teaching and left out important parts or was so confusing that you had to resort to other materials to make sense of it. I used lots of old outlines and hornbooks while making my outlines, but I always made sure I knew that it was actually something we talked about that I could have plausibly learned from listening in class. You 100% should not give a gently caress if the professor is miffed that the for-profit institution they work for doesn't want them teaching you the actual law. That's not your problem. You need to rise above this and learn the law, so when you step into the courtroom you aren't a complete moron, and when you take the bar you aren't confronted with something that is completely alien to you. If I went to Med School and had some moron teaching me how to leech AIDS patients, I would ignore him and learn how to properly treat AIDS patients. Or if he were teaching me how to pray the cancer away, I would learn on my own how to administer chemo. Why? Because you want to be a competent doctor. Being a competent lawyer upon graduation is literally at the bottom of the law school's list of priorities. Unless you go to HYS maybe. Also, 1Ls should absolutely make a blanket assumption that your 1L professors aren't teaching you enough. If you think anything else then you just haven't learned the truth yet. Example: Everyone who has made it through 1L spent... ohhh... about 8 weeks on the Statute of Frauds in Ks, then after graduation spent about 1.5 hours on it for BarBri/MicroMash/whatever, and learned literally everything possible to learn in those 1.5 hours. Personal anecdote: For my Common Law K exam 1L, I spent exactly one really long sentence and a second short sentence talking about the law of the statute of frauds. "The Statute of Frauds demands a contract be written and signed by the party the K is being enforced against in six situations: 123456. The Statute of Frauds can be waived under point 3 when two of the following three things happens: X Y and Z." That's an A+ exam right there. 8 weeks at $125 an hour plus 1/5 of a $200 book boiled down to 2 sentences, neither of which I learned from my professor. Nothing I heard come crawling out of his money sucking hole ever became relevant thereafter, until the MBE where I paid a lot of people to reiterate the concepts the 1L professor utterly failed at teaching. God why do people still go to law school. You 0Ls think I'm just ranting but you're so utterly naive. BigHead fucked around with this message at 08:48 on Aug 9, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2010 08:23 |
Feces Starship posted:I didn't disagree in almost anything else that you posted but this is just flat-out wrong unless you were like referring to what the platonic form of an exam answer would look like in a world free of the foibles and egos of professors. There were 80 people in my contracts class. I would say that once the exam rolled around 75 percent of them were able to rattle off that explanation you just gave while also cracking a 17th century hand-carved tumbler fire safe. Yet only 15% will get As, let alone the ever elusive A+ which is pretty much a myth of story and song at this point. Fair point, and you're right. But I found in my experience that as long as I could spout verbatim 2 sentences of rule on every point I would get at least an A-. So I will rephrase. "That's an A- exam at least, if you recite it verbatim. YMMV."
|
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2010 09:17 |
Draile posted:Why is the AMA good at protecting the interests of doctors but the ABA is actively out to ruin the legal profession ABA is for-profit, AMA isn't. Also the actual cost of legal education is dirt cheap - you just need a few books in your library (all donated), a few professors, and some real estate. Law schools are a HUGE money maker for otherwise cash strapped universities. Med schools need to buy cadavers, MRI machines, scalpels/bandages, do clinics for poor people, etc etc etc. Plus the AMA is in charge of a profession with actual skill, the ABA can suck dues out of anyone dumb enough to become a member. BigHead fucked around with this message at 02:22 on Aug 18, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2010 02:17 |
Rural Alaska DA trip report Number 5: After clerking for a rural Alaskan judge for exactly one week, I am officially an expert on A) the "I did I did I did the Iditarod Trail"* race, including the minutia of when the Iditarod Trail Committee can kick a musher out in the middle of the race because he's a goddamn loving [redacted]. and B) EVERY loving POST CONVICTION loving PETITION ever. Including someone whining about their loving over-the-counter [redacted] being confiscated after they personally rioted and caused serious insurrection. Let me add, however, that clerking for an appellate judge is far more awesome than writing briefs in law school. A) These are real issues with real people and real money; B) I need to be at my desk for at least 7.5 hours a day, which somehow makes writing appellate memos at least marginally interesting; and C) my fellow clerks are awesome and we all understand the exact predicament (hating law school) we are all currently in. Separate quote: SWATJester posted:And yet, the doctors still bitch about malpractice insurance costs. Yes it's the doctors driving up insurance costs. It couldn't possibly be the insurance company, they're the epitome of good-hearted egalitarianism. The Doctors are the ones demanding $350k/yr down payments on med-mal insurance. You aniled it right on the head. Edit: Not only did you nail it on the head, you analed it on the head (both gay). As a gay man, I am allowed to not only keep that typo, I am allowed to emphasize it. *If you don't know where this quote is from then you are no true Alaskan (I'm looking at you Ainsley) BigHead fucked around with this message at 09:36 on Aug 21, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2010 09:21 |
SWATJester posted:Notice how I said "Doctors bitch about" not "Doctors drive up". Insurance companies are scum, but they are scum in collusion with doctors. Yeah I noticed I completely lacked reading comprehension about 5 minutes after I posted.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2010 19:58 |
TheBestDeception posted:Look at how wrong you are... the bar is terrible To be fair, the bar itself is fine. It's the three months leading up to the bar that is unbearably soul crushing.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2010 21:41 |
SWATJester posted:This. Not if you spend 4 months in an alcoholic stupor!
|
|
# ¿ Aug 23, 2010 00:01 |
Ersatz posted:BigHead is probably arriving at three months by including BarBri lectures and readings prior to crunch time. That part wasn't really soul crushing though, just mildly disturbing. Well I don't know about you fellas, but I studied at least 8 hours a day every day for 3 months (minus weekends). My bar has a mandatory 40% failure rate, so the bare possibility of doing anything less is unheard of.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 23, 2010 04:27 |
Tetrix posted:you know when we actually talk about the law this thread kinda sucks Rural Alaskan clerkship status update: I am literally in charge of deciding who wins dibs on the Deepwater Horizon derivative lawsuit. Obviously Alaska has oodles of personal jurisdiction all over BP's a-hole, and many lawfirms are looking to flex their litigation penii. Given some random other poo poo that happened up here (I can't/won't go into specifics) there is a non-zero chance that the DWH litigation could end up in AK rather than LA, and it all hinges on me. Muahahahaha. Separate note: I am officially the nation's leading Homesteader Law expert. Oddly enough, there's a whole subset of this poo poo. International Law Pandas move over, you've got a Goldpanner lawyer to compete against. I am accepting all back-woods hicks and other prospectors as clients, starting Aug 2011. BigHead fucked around with this message at 07:30 on Aug 28, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2010 07:18 |
The Engibeard posted:So an engineering undergrad thinking about going into patent/ intellectual property law is bad? I know someone very well. Let's call him Ted. Ted went to an Ivy League school for undergrad, and graduated with some random Science degree. Ted graduated third in his class. Not third percentile, third. With this degree and this honor, Ted went to graduate school and got his PhD. Ted got his PhD in an very very relevant and very very useful field. Ted decided he hated his work, and chose to pursue patent law. So he enrolled in a very very good law school. Ted couldn't afford law school, so he applied for several scholarships. Of these scholarships, all were extremely competitive. Why? Because so few people qualified, and law school is a loving ATM for universities, so they don't like giving out scholarships to idiots dumb enough to attend. But Ted got a good scholarship and went to this highest of high law schools. Now Ted is in law school, with his PhD, graduating third in his undergraduate class, and he's looking for a job. Turns out, because law school loving sucks, that there are exactly ONE job that Ted is qualified for. One patent law job with a private firm advertised at Ted's highest of the high law schools. There were three people with PhDs in Ted's class, all three applied. Now, tell me, if you think your "undergraduate engineering degree" can survive an application process against magna and suma cum laudes with PhDs, then by all means go for it. If, on the other hand, your dumb rear end decides to attend Rutgers, then I am offering to sell you six gallons of whiskey, one gun, and one bullet. Better to get all the good times, and your eventual fate, over with before you incur the debt.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2010 03:14 |
Anthropolis posted:You had me at rural alaskan clerkship. I've got some phone interviews coming up so let me send you PM. Go right ahead! Edit: Oh you already did!
|
|
# ¿ Aug 31, 2010 02:10 |
I just found out an old High School friend of mine flies cargo 747s between Japan and Anchorage. He makes 1 one-way trip then takes four days off. It's a long-rear end trip, but still, work 2 of every 8 eights. He gets paid "shitloads."
|
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2010 07:02 |
Paisano posted:Cook/Dupage County, specifically. Really somewhere around the Chicago area. Cook County prosecutor's office is literally a hellhole. I think the NY night shift may technically be a worse place to work as a prosecutor, but dear god you need to be masochistic to even attempt to be a Chicago DA. They spend like 8 seconds per case during arraignments according to some random book I read in law school. That's not an exaggeration. Imagine trying to explain to a drunk pro se why the First Amendment doesn't apply to urinating on people while riding the bus in under 8 seconds, then do it for 14 hours per day for free, repeat for a few years (while loans are due) and you've got yourself an outside shot at being hired making $40k/yr. None of that is an exaggeration. Now Rural Alaskan prosecutor, that's a totally different story. poo poo is hella fun, yo. And they're still hiring in balmy Bethel! Edit: The book was Courtroom 502 or 501 or something. Read it and decide if you still want to be a Cook County Prosecutor. BigHead fucked around with this message at 16:35 on Sep 9, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Sep 9, 2010 07:31 |
Friend of mine just randomly got a call from the Social Security Administrative Appeal, uh, "Court" and was offered a job clerking. She was very conflicted because she hates Admin Law, but I told her to be loving ecstatic because it's a federal job and she gets a security clearance. Does she have a chance at lateraling into anything, or should she continue ruing her terrible luck at getting the one job she will undoubtedly hate?
|
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2010 06:50 |
Grammar Fascist posted:I think Lexis has a lot more online stuff you can do to get points, and MUCH better actual rewards (gift cards and such). At my school Lexis also has a lot more trainings and things, so I think it just depends on the reps. Employing a system similar to this, I bought two pair of shoes and four video games during law school. Literally the only positive from going to law school is the free Westlaw/Lexis points. Rural Alaskan Clerking Update: This bitch somehow managed to steal $800k in student loans. The kicker is that she's not a law student but some sort of stupid Oriental Studies PhD. She's also a Rhodes Scholar. While reviewing the case (it was in front of some other judge, so I'm speaking as a dispassionate public observer), I was thinking "That's not THAT much in student loans, I bet her education cost that much if she got $800k in 10 years." I was wrong. Yeah turns out it's literally criminal to take out $80k/yr in loans. How much did YOU take out for law school? BigHead fucked around with this message at 05:23 on Sep 12, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2010 05:16 |
diospadre posted:I used Lexis because their rep was far hotter than the Westlaw one. Both of mine were truly and utterly soul-crushed bald fat men. Which, if you're into horribly soul-crushed bald fat men, then my school's world is your oyster. But alas the bald fat men have since moved on . By soul-crushed, I mean far beyond anything you can imagine. Our Lexis guy dragged his children into our training sessions and would go apeshit if they misbehaved, and you could tell he was just so, utterly, completely, lonely. His eyes were just so desolate and unhappy. Our westlaw guy was just normal fat and bald I guess, which is still fairly soul-crushing.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2010 06:50 |
Incredulous Red posted:Wild Turkey pairs with everything I actually had Wild Turkey with fresh-caught wild turkey. Surprisingly, not that good.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2010 05:12 |
Jove posted:Law School Trip Report: Remember this: if you want to win the big-dollar lottery, you will literally only write memos 12hrs/day for 6-7 days/week for, oh, 7 years before you become a partner. Then you can write for 18hrs/day! Hooray! BigHead fucked around with this message at 05:09 on Sep 20, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2010 04:57 |
Vander posted:Civ 5 is out tomorrow morning. What disease can I fake that will get me out of school for a month? So far, I've got mono, leprosy, bubonic plague and lupus. Any ideas? "Smartening up." Symptoms include dropping out, reading something that's actually useful, and/or not going to class for a month.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2010 05:30 |
Don't worry guys I got a letter from my utterly useless ex-Dean:quote:Dear Members of the Class of 2010, I'm so raging about this. And I'm one of the lucky ones who landed a clerkship. Jesus Christ, their one actual accomplishment is a singular VISTA job (whatever VISTA is), and a position as a career counselor (our dream job). And this letter is supposed to comfort us. Edit: I think I can respond six times per sentence but will limit myself to these. BigHead fucked around with this message at 06:38 on Sep 21, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2010 05:50 |
Lilosh posted:I have a question for Mookie, or anyone who actually has a lawyer job (So probably only him) For rules of crim pro / civil pro / appellate pro / admin pro etc, the Official State Books are infinitely helpful because after each rule they have a synopsis of cases dealing with that rule. That being said, I come from a small jurisdiction where all that poo poo is in one (gigantic) tomb. If you have several (dozen) tombs, YYMV. These books are real-life books by the way, not those lovely books you get in 1L. They're, like, the actual books of civ pro and crim pro. That being said, if you 'tarded 1L professor insists on 'spergin' (god I can add an apostrophe to both ends of that word) about textbooks, then he can go gently caress himself. No real life lawyer on the planet cares about the facts of Spivey v. Bataglia (my favorite Torts case) and they will never care. For everything other than the local rules of the court, Westlaw or Lexis is your most direct route. But, remember that if you work in private practice, you will have to pay for Westlaw/Lexis (which means you charge your clients for Westlaw/Lexis) which can get loving expensive. If you get hired by a private firm and fall into your law school free-for-all research habits, you can easily wrack up $20k in bills for Exxon / Toys'r'us / Costco / whatever. Book research only costs as much as the books cost. BigHead fucked around with this message at 08:20 on Sep 29, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2010 07:51 |
Totally Negro posted:Dear Law Student Goons, You can't say "Honestly, I'm not trolling" and still troll. It's against civil decency. Therefore, I will pretend this is a real question. The answer to your question is almost zero. If your friend somehow manages to be dumb enough to spend $200k (plus lost wages) on a law degree he doesn't really want, have him obtain the current contact information for ULV's recent alumni. Tell him to call, at random, a dozen alumni, and ask a) if they have a job, b) if they do have a job, whether it's a good job, and c) what percentage of their income is being spent on student loans. Yes, one guy the class probably got some random job at some medium-sized immigration firm and won't die horribly alone in the gutter surrounded by empty Listerine bottles he sucked down in a desperate attempt to numb his pain, but since your friend is dumb enough to consider this law school he's probably too dumb to graduate with a job. Also ask him if he thinks he can compete with the guys from Stanford and UC Berkeley. Hell, even Stanford and UC Berkeley kids are hard-pressed to find big money jobs. Edit: Then, if he's still deadset on it, have him find some lengthy (50pg or more) legal briefing or complicated contracts and ask him if he wants to desperately fight for a job writing those documents for 12 hours a day, 7 days a week for 30 years. The real moment most of us realize they made a mistake is when we read our first 50 page Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re Cross Claim's Interest Rate Start Date. BigHead fucked around with this message at 00:30 on Oct 1, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2010 00:23 |
Totally Negro posted:BigHead and diospadre, thanks for the answers. Really appreciate them. It is permanently hosed for that bottom of the toilet school he's considering. I think job prospects will get markedly better for... oh... probably the 30 or 40 top universities, but he's literally considering the worst of the worst. He would literally be better off if he took out a loan for $200k and burned it, because then people at non-law jobs - which I guarantee he will try to get after graduation because no law firm will hire him - won't think he's "overqualified" when really he's just trying to stave off bankruptcy, starvation and suicide. We're not kidding when we say this, we're not trolling, and we're not being overly dramatic. A lot of people way smarter than him are unemployed. Remember California is pumping out several times more law school graduates than there are openings in California each year. How many DAs and PDs do you think the state hires when it can't afford to pay the electricity bill in schools? Someone with more knowledge of the issue can tell you that job candidates for government jobs work for YEARS for free, hoping some day their turn in line will come, and they will be paid $35k/yr for poo poo work. The one bright side though, if he goes to that school, he'll be too poor to become an alcoholic or coke head, like the rest of us have become. As for your brother, if he goes to Stanford or UCBerk, there is still a non-zero chance he's going to end up poor and homeless (remember we're not kidding about that), but his chances of landing a job are pretty decent. BigHead fucked around with this message at 01:29 on Oct 1, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2010 01:16 |
Incredulous Red posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pcVDmX4ho4 Fun fact: Alaska's version of Rudy Giuliani doesn't just pack heat, he packs a loving assault rifle. Dude has four guns (that I saw) in his office. Two huntin' rifles, one hand gun for protection, and one assault rifle "just 'cause." Therefore, Alaska is superior Denny Crain.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2010 07:33 |
Abugadu posted:Our former AG had an entire armory in his personal office (his family runs the gun stores), and went around with two investigator/bodyguards at all times. If 90% of America has never heard of your tiny quasi-American island, then your island don't count. Seriously though you had a nice contribution to the psycho-MI-AAG thread.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2010 08:04 |
Rural Alaskan clerkship update part deux. Here's a protip for all you future lawyers out there: If your state abides by Daylight Savings Time, then your State Standard Time may be one hour different than your State Daylight Savings Time, especially if your State is located in two timezones. Why is this important? Because failure to recognize this could lead to a malpractice lawsuit if you don't realize that laws come into effect at 12:01am of Standard time instead of Savings time. Dude successfully got his felony conviction overturned too, which is impressive. I think that case wins for the most inane lawsuit ever by the way. BigHead fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Oct 1, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2010 20:21 |
Poop Faerie posted:You've written two gigantic walls of text and haven't said a single thing that would convince any normal person that law school is a good idea.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2010 00:42 |
Poop Faerie posted:Never mind, forget it. Honestly, I was coming here for a "I plan on going (or at least applying), please give me some guidance on these things" and it's going in a direction I don't want to. I understand why, I know I'm getting defensive and rambling to try to make y'all understand, but it's not what I'm looking for. You can't complain about not getting guidance when every post has given you the exact same guidance: don't go.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2010 01:40 |
Go to culinary arts school, or join a karate club in your free time.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2010 01:43 |
He's a troll. Trolls don't deserve more than 2 or 3 sentences of response just to remind all the non-troll serious dumbs that the dumb decision of law school is dumb.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2010 04:23 |
nm posted:Yay! You know how some OBGYNs become OBGYNs just so they can dissuade and/or kill women who want abortions? Some prosecutors become prosecutors just so they can put poor black/brown people in jail, and to hell with the law. It's so crazy these stories of the crazy rear end people who purport to be on the same intellectual level as us. These guys are the Tea Party of lawyers. Even penniless paupers who will die alone and young (from liver failure) (all of us) know these guys are insane BigHead fucked around with this message at 04:34 on Oct 6, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2010 04:31 |
Abugadu posted:Fair prosecutors get hung out to dry and don't last in a judicial system bent on splitting babies and a political system encouraging a blind jihad against crime regardless of circumstances. To be fair, fair prosecutors aren't elected. And if they aren't elected, they don't give a gently caress what some hick from the sticks thinks. And by "hick from the sticks" I mean hick from the sticks and elected official. Edit: in my limited experience. BigHead fucked around with this message at 05:02 on Oct 6, 2010 |
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2010 04:56 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 19:11 |
[redacted] drat.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2010 05:10 |