|
ahahahahahahaha we're all screwed (even more)
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2010 22:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 23:15 |
|
CaptainScraps posted:gently caress this let's go be professors and feed the beast.
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2010 22:19 |
|
chinchilla posted:The op is excellent, thanks to everyone that contributed, but one thing wasn't entirely clear. What difference does your focus in undergrad make? Any at all? Would a degree like music history (mine) be a disadvantage?
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2010 04:49 |
|
I've never heard of Knewton, are they yet another TM/PS/BP splinter group? $100/hr for teaching sounds way too good to be true.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2010 17:09 |
|
One of my LSAT students has like four black belts and owns an MMA gym. All I can do is shake my head.
Elotana fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Aug 19, 2010 |
# ¿ Aug 19, 2010 17:55 |
|
Defleshed posted:Trying to consolidate my student loans is literally the most bureaucracy and red tape and confusion I have ever dealt with in my life and I have worked for the Federal Government.
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2010 21:27 |
|
Undergrad poo poo means nothing. If you were president or founder of a large organization it might be a very slight soft factor tiebreaker, and if you have absolutely no extracurriculars it might be a very slight negative, but beyond that, nothing.
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2010 23:24 |
|
So I thought I was starting at my firm after Labor Day and got a very nice call from the office manager explaining that it was actually the first of the month. How to avoid an awkward first day at work: don't show up!
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2010 18:29 |
|
MINN. ST. SEC. 480A.08(3) - Do you really really want to?
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2010 20:26 |
|
Do you have a job Linguica
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2010 15:16 |
|
The only schools on that list you should even be considering are USC/UCLA, and that's only if you have a substantial (>50%) scholarship and would be happy settling for something other than entertainment law (because if you don't have entertainment connections right now, at this very moment, before you start law school, it's not gonna happen for you so deal with it).
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2010 03:45 |
|
E.D. Texas owns don't hate
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2010 16:55 |
|
Zealous Abattoir posted:You assholes. I've wanted to be a lawyer my whole loving life. Ever since I was a little kid. Now here I am, night before the LSATS, having an existential crisis. I hate you all. Now I am unsure about going to law school, and don't know what the gently caress to do. I never thought of myself as not going to law school. I thought of Library Science, but I was going to go do both.
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2010 17:09 |
|
Even once you filter out the utterly irrelevant stuff there's still several boxes' worth of stuff out of that warehouse that will turn out to be relevant.
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2010 01:17 |
|
Also aren't straight As the default in grad school or something
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2010 21:56 |
|
stingray1381 posted:I know I'm being lazy, and I could look this up, but how do law schools differ from med schools? Why are med schools able to control their numbers?
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2010 15:05 |
|
When I took my LSAT it was at an HBCU thirty miles south of my university because our LSAT date coincided with a home football game and on our campus it was administered right across the street
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2010 07:57 |
|
You'll get in everywhere you apply!
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2010 01:36 |
|
CaptainScraps posted:Mookie raises a good point. I'm sure they were competent attorneys, but they were busy attorneys, and totally incompetent teachers.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2010 00:34 |
|
TX bar results:
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2010 21:33 |
|
Hahaha I got the letter with my actual bar exam score back and I think am the most efficient attorney in Texas
|
# ¿ Nov 10, 2010 09:08 |
|
CaptainScraps posted:I have a friend who passed with half your score. On the plus side I did way better on the MBE so I can still waive into DC if I want to (man my essays must have been poo poo on toast)
|
# ¿ Nov 10, 2010 17:01 |
|
Law thread what is the best plan to study for the patent bar. I have a month left to take it and I don't want to spend a lot of money on a self-prep course (I'll buy secondhand materials off eBay if someone recommends their books specifically but that's about it).
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2010 17:00 |
|
NJ Deac posted:Also, I hope you've mailed in your application to the PTO, because they take at least a couple of weeks (longer if you're a CS grad from a non-ABET college) to process, and then you have to schedule time at a ProMetric facility (which can be annoyingly difficult if you don't want to drive hours to a remote facility on exam day). The patent bar is no joke, so if you haven't started to study, you need to get on it immediately. Most of the home study programs are about 50 hours of lecture and a ton of sample questions, so if you're going to get through one before the end of the year, you're running out of time. When I was on the IP journal in law school I was told by students that if you took a bunch of patent electives, a week of solid studying is enough to pass and that the main skills are familiarity with the MPEP and a solid grasp of CTRL+F for the online copy you get. I don't really have much interest in lectures since I always learn best by reading which is why I'll likely buy some secondhand materials from one of those courses off eBay and cram for a week and call it good. Worked for the TX bar.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2010 20:06 |
|
Don't read any casebook three days before, that's stupid. Grab some good outlines (or buy some if you're asocial, outlinedepot has drat near everything if your casebook isn't popular enough for commercial outlines), and spend those three days reading those instead. Maybe do some highlighting and tabbing in your book if you already bought it but let the outline be your guide as to what's important. Unless your professor is the actual author of a casebook there is no need to buy them after your first semester of 1L. The only exceptions I can think of are small, new or rarely offered classes that are heavy on policy, where having access to cases on Lexis won't help and there aren't any outlines available. Between the availability of outlines, the availability of cases, and the availability of old editions in your library, there's just no excuse for being a chump and enabling the textbook hustle. Three weeks is a very long time. IMO three days of cramming is just fine for open-book or open-note exams. I never dipped below a B on an open exam and net a fair share of As. Elotana fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Nov 28, 2010 |
# ¿ Nov 28, 2010 23:10 |
|
evilweasel posted:I really disagree with this. I find that long outlines for open-book exams are a hindrance: you want a short outline, and for the esoteric topics, you want the page number. That means you have the important stuff there, summarized, and when your professor pulls some small detail out you can re-read the four pages in the book and know everything you are expected to know about the subject.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2010 09:45 |
|
Did you try outlinedepot? BK is a pretty common class, if there aren't old outlines there for your professor specifically there's almost certainly commercial flowcharts keyed to your textbook.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2010 17:51 |
|
Lilosh posted:I've seen a bunch of stuff on Outline Depot that looked relevant (Outlines keyed to my casebook, etc), but Outline Depot seemed a bit sketchy, and "Outline depot scam" came up when I went to google them.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2010 17:50 |
|
I forget, did the majority opinions address the obvious incentive for cops to just train dogs that indicate all the time (or at least massively err on that side)?
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2010 20:27 |
|
Daico posted:Texas Civil Procedure can blow me. "Hmmm how can I get everyone to buy my awful book despite my final exam having jack poo poo to do with what we learned in class or what's on the bar exam. I know, weekly homework assignments and randomly selected group discussions!"
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2010 03:27 |
|
Daico posted:You or Scraps got any info on what's *actually* on the exam? CaptainScraps posted:Appellate procedure. Know it.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2010 20:42 |
|
Anyone have any classmates become landmen (landwomen)? (This might be a Texas-specific question.)
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2010 20:33 |
|
Ainsley McTree posted:Don't you have to have a whole bunch of qualifications before you even get admitted to med school though? Like undergrad courses or something I dunno. Or is it like law where you can just* take the MCAT and hope you do well?
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2010 01:42 |
|
NJ Deac posted:The partners at my firm recently got a bug up their rear end about having all of the associates finish their USPTO registration. Of the four of us studying to take it right now, three of us are using the PLI program (one of us bought the materials on eBay and saved a couple grand, I and another guy paid full sticker price, minus a partial reimbursement from the firm), and one is using Omniprep. Baruch Obamawitz posted:Having taken and passed the patent bar right after law school, I can confirm that this is the case (minus the week of studying). 1. Be a nerd under the age of 30 who can intelligently construct search strings based on unique phrases, if you are old or not a computer nerd ask one to help you (they don't need to know anything about patents or whatever) 2. Download the MPEP (individual PDFs for each chapter) and Acrobat 5 (it's what Prometric uses) and make your screen resolution tiny so your interface will be similar to what it is on the exam 3. Go here and spend a few hours walking through the 2003 repeats so you can be and answer instantly when they give you a recognizable repeat question, this will also get you familiar with what to search for each subject 4. Take the patent bar: Congratulations you've passed! Note the complete absence of "prep course" or "patent electives" or even "knowing jack poo poo about law and/or engineering" in this method. Elotana fucked around with this message at 23:22 on Dec 20, 2010 |
# ¿ Dec 20, 2010 23:14 |
|
NJ Deac posted:I'm not sure I'd agree the prep course was entirely worthless, though. It helped a bit knowing what sections of the MPEP to focus on and what to ignore, and there were quite a few repeat questions I saw in their software that weren't on the 02 and 03 practice exams. God Tier: 700, 2100 High Tier: 600, 1200, 1400 Mid Tier: 200, 500, 800, 900, 1500, 2200 Low Tier: 100, 300, 400, 1300, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2300, 2500 Not Tested: 1000, 1100, 1600, 1700, 2400, 2500, 2600, 2700
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2010 23:54 |
|
There's always a ton of PCT bullshit but most of it isn't actually in 1800, since 1800 governs the functioning of the actual treaty but the questions are mostly about how the USPTO treats PCT filings for prior art or critical dates on our end. 2136.03 was where I ended up for at least three different PCT questions.
Elotana fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Dec 21, 2010 |
# ¿ Dec 21, 2010 00:08 |
|
Baruch Obamawitz posted:Second pop quiz: what's the filing date of a national stage filed 30 months after a PCT application when they forgot to file an oath?
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2010 00:30 |
|
Baruch Obamawitz posted:I've cited Something Awful before as a reference because I'm just that lazy
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2010 00:32 |
|
Oh my god that is dogshit, speaking as a Former Moderator™ those claims are 103 as fuuuuuuck
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2010 05:28 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 23:15 |
|
Realtalk if you're good at taking tests you can pass the bar by buying a used Conviser book on eBay and studying that for two weeks
|
# ¿ Dec 22, 2010 23:37 |