- Uncle Ivan
- Aug 31, 2001
-
|
DOF is fairly deep at the tele end unfortunately. But quite serviceable at the wide end. Not ideal for portraits though, works better for macro or other inanimate objects.
|
#
¿
May 4, 2015 20:35
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2024 14:35
|
|
- Uncle Ivan
- Aug 31, 2001
-
|
Just got one, it's great. The problem is it's so much more work to use a real camera than my Pixel XL, which is fantastic for a smartphone. I wish that there were some kind of bracketed HDR RAW format in modern cameras that I could use with DXO Optics for maximum exposure latitude. Modern phones do HDR so well that it ends up being a lot of work to replicate that look in post-processing. If you use the in-camera HDR, it's JPEG only and it doesn't look quite like what I want. Basically I find that my phone captures the scene closest as I remember it, and then I end up post-processing my RX100 and RX1R images to look that way, but with limitations due to the lack of true bracketing (as on the phone). Quality still blows away phone photos, obviously.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 28, 2017 12:18
|
|
- Uncle Ivan
- Aug 31, 2001
-
|
The small official glue-on rubber grip is a 100% must.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 01:35
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2015 20:35
