|
The problem with the LX3/G11/etc is that if it doesn't fit in a pocket, it's going to need a bag, and at that point an entry-level dSLR will offer order-of-magnitude better IQ at a very small weight/financial cost.
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2010 21:34 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 06:46 |
|
The big problem with a bridge camera is simply the size. They make true compacts these days with a great zoom range, she should look into those. Unless she's got an event coming up she'd need the camera for, there's no reason to get whatever's in stock instead of what's appropriate.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2010 08:36 |
|
What's the budget? Also what's the biggest size you're prepared to deal with?
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2010 19:39 |
|
LX3, G11, that new Samsung. If you can do a little more, probably an M4/3 with the 20mm f/1.7, and a NEX whenever Sony puts out a prime that makes sense.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2010 14:44 |
|
Yeah but a D3s review focused on low light can be summed up by "everything else is worse" so eh.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2010 17:43 |
|
qirex posted:One thing I've always wondered is why cameras don't have weaker flash settings
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2010 22:18 |
|
That's weird. I don't own a P&S any more, but on my LX3 dialling a bit a negative flash comp (and sometimes pushing ISO a stop or so) worked wonders.
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2010 08:23 |
|
maverick99 posted:My Canon SD1400IS I just bought has an auto flash feature. It lowers the intensity the closer the object is to the camera. I think it works pretty well myself. The real problem is that P&S are just bad at balancing flash and ambient.
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2010 12:41 |
|
Tetrad posted:Then again, my current S90 has a dead pixel on the sensor, so I'm tempted to get this when it comes out regardless.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2010 10:55 |
|
ScreaminKing posted:EDIT: it's when you need repairs.
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2010 07:11 |
|
Yeah, a 24-28 difference is more significant than 90-105. The LX5 lens is a wee bit faster too, but you should check out the sensor comparisons.
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2010 13:33 |
|
I meant compare the actual performance when they get tested
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2010 14:51 |
|
So get it? To real advantage of the s95 is the size.
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2010 15:14 |
|
I'd think long and hard about the NEX/SLR thing. You'd have to go to full frame to get much better IQ. It's just that the lens options are limited now 8(
|
# ¿ Sep 1, 2010 19:31 |
|
Septimus posted:The DMC-LX5 appears to be technically superior to the S95 BUT it is physically thicker. Is the only thing going for the S95 its size?
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2010 09:14 |
|
krushgroove posted:My only tip can be to carry some rice around with you. krushgroove posted:Scratches on the lens and missing screws? I hope you're getting a good deal.
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2010 13:48 |
|
manpants posted:I was very happy to get my (not stolen) 70-200mm 2.8L IS for £400.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2010 11:16 |
|
It might hold a comparatively better resale, but the price difference might just be the same.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2010 16:20 |
|
If you shoot jpeg you kinda need to get it right. If you shoot raw just give no fucks and fix them in a batch.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2010 23:47 |
|
I'd be curious to know why. On the raw issue: I just convert all my poo poo to DNG. 10 years from now I don't know there'll be good software to read my NEF files, but DNG will most likely be fine.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2010 12:19 |
|
Beastruction posted:Mijonju is pretty fond of those.
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2010 21:53 |
|
There's little more to the technical side than the exposure triangle.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2011 20:53 |
|
Beastruction posted:I think the NEX is available in a kit with a 16mm pancake, and is a bit smaller than the E-PL1.
|
# ¿ May 16, 2011 13:47 |
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I don't find it bad IQ-wise, but it's pretty limiting if it's your only lens. http://www.photozone.de/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/542-sony16f28nex?start=2 And yeah, a 24/2.8 as your only prime on launch? WTF were they smoking?
|
# ¿ May 16, 2011 16:40 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 06:46 |
|
Bob Socko posted:I have a Blackrapid strap already - the RS Sport, or whatever it's called. It's a nice strap, I've just fallen into this strange habit over the past couple of years of not attaching straps to my cameras. I got an a77 at launch and still haven't taken the OEM strap out of it's packaging.
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2012 15:29 |