Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Jedrick posted:

Could anyone ID this amp for me? (Awful cellphone picture incoming.)

I bought it for $100 a while ago and I don't know much about it (besides the fact that it's dusty as poo poo, holy crap.) The only marking relating to the make or model I could find was "Models 400" (Model S 400?) Any help would be appreciated.

Haha, I have wondered the same thing. A few years ago I helped in the recording of a punk band that used that as their recording amp. The tone sucked solo-hard. Mixed well with the rest of the band however.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Philthy posted:

Possibly this? http://www.harmonycentral.com/products/96783

yeah, I think that is it.. check this out.. http://www.univox.org/pics/amps/stage_720.jpg

Unicord stage 720 .. Univox bought them out? 70s amp?

Unicord Model 400/210 Lead Combo ($305) - 40W, 2 10" speakers, preamp volume, clipping control, treble, bass, reverb, master volume. 1977-1980

http://www.univox.org/amps/uniamp.html

You are the man. With a little more research, it is the Stage 400-

http://www.gbase.com/gear/univox-stage-s400-1978-black

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki
The guy who I know who had one in his studio to record with used to use a distortion pedal into it but also had the distortion on the amp turned up-not usually the right way to go, but it sounded really good. It makes sense now reading that, as the fuzz was parallel, making the secondary fuzz controllable instead of simply distorting the original signal.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Ferrous Wheel posted:

Okay, so I'm looking to downsize in both wattage and weight from my ValveKing 112. Even though I'm going smaller, I still want decent clean headroom since the plan is to get my OD from pedals. I play mostly single coils (strat copies, Epi Casino) and use a bridge humbucker for more defined distorted stuff. I play all kinds of music so versatility is good but I'm not concerned with emulating any particular sound. I just want an amp that has 15-30 watts of largely clean headroom and takes pedals well.

I've considered the Egnater Tweaker 15 combo and the Jet City JCA2112 (I've since heard that the Jet City specializes in early breakup) as well as various stuff like VHT, old Traynor and Sunn, even Carvin.

Looking to spend maybe $500-$600. Thoughts?

The Tweaker is stupidly versatile, the Jet City is a one-trick pony (but oh what a trick!!!) The Tweaker covers pretty much all your needs as far as American to British, Vintage to Modern, but you do have to play with it a lot to get your "perfect sound" as the options can kind of make you overload. The Jet City basically does Clean-ish to brash, almost early Metallica metal tone with less low end, and very little in between (and does get angry sounding pretty early). Also, the fact that it is single channel could really limit you. That said, it is half the cost and sounds just KILLER. Keep in mind that, with the money saved you can get an extension cab for larger gigs.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Zakalwe posted:

I fixed a noisy wah pot with the teflon oil stuff I spray in my bike lock. Rocked it back and forth a few times and it's been fine since. It's probably not optimal, but it worked perfectly. I've heard of people using WD40 and getting good results. At least the pot will smell great if it doesn't work :)

Never use WD40. It is a penetrating lube (insert dick joke here) that will soften your carbon tracks and kill your pot faster.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

cheap sunglasses posted:

They're not that loud, but yeah definitely a little on the big side for a combo.


e: I was kinda disappointed with mine at first, the gain was kinda boxy and crap compared to my old block letter head. As soon as I switched out the preamp tubes it sounded like a normal 5150. I'm guessing the PI tube was the problem. Either that or Ruby tubes just suck.

The first 5150s had American made tubes. When they switched from the block-lettering, they also went with Ruby Tubes, the idea being that, while they weren't the best sounding, they could take a loving beating. That is why people seem to think that the block-letter 5150s sound better-they had better tubes, but no other components were different. JJ's are a good (comparable) swap to what they used to have.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

cheap sunglasses posted:

When I bought the head it had Tung-sols in the preamp and Sovteks in the poweramp, but it was like 10 years old at the time, so it'd be amazing if it hadn't been retubed. I have nothing to compare it with but it sounded right, so I haven't bothered to try anything different.

Incidentally I retubed my combo with JJs. I think it was just a bad tube in the preamp; none of them were microphonic and I didn't have any spares around to test individual ones.


Actually the 112 combo sounds half decent at bedroom levels. Obviously not as gnarly as it does loud but definitely better than 99% of practice amps.

The 5150 gets 90% of its distortion from the preamp-the power amp on it is actually really sterile sounding (biased really cold, hence the crap clean sound). I would actually use it as a bedroom amp before I would the Classic 30, which needs to be cranked a bit to get some life out of it.

(And that is coming from a person who would pick a Classic 30 any day of the week for gigging)

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

TyChan posted:

The WD-40 didn't work that well.

I ended up buying some Radio Shack house brand "Electronics Cleaner" that worked really well in getting rid of the weird noise on the detente volume pot. The cleaner is not petroleum based and it was substantially cheaper than De-Oxit too, so I think it all worked out to the good.

That poo poo is just mineral oil-it doesn't do much (though you can use it to make yourself crap). Seriously........people, just use De-Oxit. It is a dielectric lube, and also cleans your pots/sliders through the naphtha that it is suspended in (which evaporates to leave no evil residue). The Radio Shack spray is just a dust trap, and WD40 will literally destroy your pots.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

TyChan posted:

Are you sure you're thinking of the right spray? The stuff I used says it has only has Isohexane and Ethanol with CO2 as a propellant.

It's not the old Radio Shack TV Tuner Spray, which has mineral oil.

Anyway, the amp is working noiselessly now so I really have no complaints.

I stand corrected, and think it is pretty damned swanky that Radio Shack now has a proper electronic cleaner spray.

Thank you for the correction. :glomp:

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Manky posted:

I've actually heard a lot of good things about the Danelectro Honeytone. If I didn't already have a couple of battery powered amps, I'd be tempted to get one.

The Honeytone is a cool amp, but it sounds like a fuzz pedal with a speaker. You get a REALLY cool sound, but don't expect anything like dynamics, etc. Think more Big Muff cranked with your phone speaker hooked up.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

TyChan posted:

Did you try these at Guitar Center? I play with 2 guys who both have these and they seem pretty nice.

http://www.fender.com/products/hotrod/models.php?prodNo=2230500

They are good but kind of boxy sounding. I always thought that, side by side, the Pro Jr smoked the Blues Jr (even with the 10in speaker and lack of features).

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Sweeper posted:

Thanks, I'll look at these after work tomorrow. I found a tiny terror on cl for ~$600 and it isn't too far away. I'm hoping that it doesn't get sold before I have a chance to check it out.

The Pro JR is kind of the hidden gem of the Fender line. It was actually designed by Bruce Zinky (the story I was told by the one of the execs there was that he was told to make a good, simple amp on Friday, and came back on Monday with the prototype), and is an amazing sounding amp for the money. Basically sounds like the bastard son of a Champ and an AC15. Not a huge amount of gain but it is loud for 15 watts and EXTREMELY controllable with the volume knob. Because of the one volume/one tone setup, you have to fight really hard to get a bad sound out of it. Also, it takes pedals like a pro.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Globochem posted:

Fellas, maybe you can help me make up my mind. I've got the option to buy a Vox AD30VT off Craigslist for $115 or I can go buy a new Vox 15VT for $130 and tax.

I was playing around on the Vox 15VT earlier and really liked it, which is when these things came to my attention. For those that don't know, the VT is the successor to the ADxxVT series. They're similar but the VT model is new and improved with nearly double pre-sets and effects options. The VT also has its own Reverb knob, which I really liked.

I play primarly for myself, I'm not looking to gig with either of these, so the extra wattage isn't all that important. Is it worth it to save a few bucks to buy the older model? Looking at reviews it sounds like while the VT is more advanced, it's not necessarily light years ahead of its predecessor.

Having seen cold solder breaks on the "tube" circuit of my AD30....yea, different amp. The AC4tv is stupidly great sounding.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

TyChan posted:

Do Ampegs have a certain guitar tone that they're famous for in the same way people seek out the SVT bass sound?

Clean as gently caress. Apparently the execs at Ampeg didn't like distortion, so their early amps were made to be clean to ear-splitting volumes. The later V series amps had a sort of HiWatt mojo going on-bright, clean with just the right amount of hair. Think Queens of the Stone Age and mid-era Rolling Stones.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Walked posted:

Anyone played with the Fender Champion 600?

I picked one up super cheap (~$100) this weekend new; and the thing has an awesome tone and decent at-home volume for that price. It sounds _awesome_ with a telecaster.

If so, is it worth my time/effort to swap out for nicer tubes? This is my first fully tube amp (I mainly play solid-state bass)

The biggest upgrade you can make is to the speaker-the tubes are actually pretty decent, but the stock speaker blows. Webber makes a great replacement.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Boz0r posted:

If I have a Peavey Bandit 112 Combot and I get a proper tube head, can I have both amps use the speaker in the bandit combo and switch between them in some sort of fancy way until I get a proper cabinet?

Also, is there an internet shop like gabkits.com where you can buy custom enclosures for amps and cabinets that ships to Denmark?

If your amp has a slave out (or parallel FX out) you can send to the bandit and use your Bandit as a slaved power amp, or you can solder on some speaker leads to your bandit with a speaker jack (though, then you would have to deal with impedance issues potentially)

I would PERSONALLY run your amp with a splitter pedal, as you can then use the Bandit as an extra clean amp, or do some cool stereo FX stuff.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

Gh0st_Preacher posted:

I checked through the thread and saw no mention of the Line 6 DT50. Their page for it is here:
http://line6.com/dt50/

Their basic premise is to take their modeling tech. and apply real tubes. So it's a combination of DSP and Analog in both the Power Amp and Pre Amp sections of it.

Has anybody here had a chance to play around with one of these things? If so, what'd you think? I want to believe it isn't just a gimmick, but I have my suspicions.

It is the real deal. The power-amp modeling is actually disabled for everything but "low power" mode, so, any power amp grit you hear at normal to loud volumes is coming from the amp. It sounds like the fist of god.

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

How dreadful! posted:

1) I've had a tube amp made custom (allegedly a Mesa Rect-o-verb clone) and I'd like to play it at night without going to jail. It has Line-Out for handy use with a cabinet emulator, but the master volume on the head also controls the Line-Out volume, so I can't turn that up without also turning it up through the real cabinet.

I've heard of dummy loads, but I'm not sure where to look for one/ how to build one/ what to look for.

2) When I switch channels, the sound cuts off for about a second. It is very obvious and unfortunate, since sometimes I run a loop (out of a loop pedal) through the FX loop and it cuts that off as well. The guy who built my amp said this was by design (he called it a 'mute') so as not to fry the speakers (or was it tubes?) when changing channels.

Is there a way around this?

1.Webber Mini-Mass or THD Hot Plate. Webber makes the best sounding, THD is the most available. Stay away from the Marshall, I've heard nothing but bad things both for tube burn and tone.

2.Whoever built your amp is full of crap. Chances are the mute is there because they had a "pop" when switching that they were trying to cover up in a sloppy way. Don't know how it was rigged though, if it is done with a hard relay then you may be SOL. Take it to a good tech and see if there is something they can do.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Professorbx
Jan 27, 2005
Wicki Wicki

TyChan posted:

I've played with guitarists at small bars/club venues and the Blues Jr. was more than adequate. I thought they sounded really good and if you're willing to put in the time with pedal tweaking, I think it's pretty easy to get a lot of different kinds of sounds out of those Fender tube amps.

Professorbx says that the Pro Junior is a better deal. It's cheaper than a Blues Junior, but lacks a reverb feature and has less EQ control. Since you're starting out, you might find that nice.

Yup. The Pro Jr. is really one of the best amps that Fender has made in the last 20 years, period. The Blues Jr. is a pretty boxy sounding amp clean, and a nasal (think cheap distortion pedal) amp on the drive channel. The 12inch speaker is a little wasted on the circuit. The Pro Jr. is a super organic amp, very much a hybrid of the classic Champ and Vox tones, and it absolutely SCREAMS when cranked. Also, the choice of preamp tubes has a huge effect on the tone-when I had mine, if I wanted a more tame clean tone, I would put a JJ 12at7 in the PI slot and a JJ 12ax7 in the preamp tube slot. If I wanted something totally ripping, I would put high-gain JJ ECC83's in the preamp and PI slots. It was subtle nuances like that that I appreciated, which wouldn't come through nearly as much on the Blues Jr.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply