Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Giant Isopod
Jan 30, 2010

Bathynomus giganteus
Yams Fan
I was going to ask the synthetic diamond question, but I was beaten too it. Then this came along:

Monkey Lincoln posted:


Manufactured and diamond synthetics probably won't be a huge problem, like Moissanite is now. If they're man made, they'll almost always be labeled as such, and if not most jewelers are always wary of big stones that are too clean and too white.


I don't get this. Are you implying that they will always be considered inferior? Why? It's the same rock, right?

I was under the assumption that once we got synthetic diamonds down right we could stop digging the drat things out of the ground.

If anything, the idea that they will always be labeled as such and considered 2nd class is the huge problem.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Giant Isopod
Jan 30, 2010

Bathynomus giganteus
Yams Fan

Cait posted:

I'm all for synthetic - except where diamonds are concerned.

Why?

  • Locked thread