|
The only company in the US that makes sodium thiopental for lethal injections is stopping production.quote:COLUMBUS, Ohio – The sole U.S. manufacturer of a key lethal injection drug said Friday it is ending production because of death-penalty opposition overseas — a move that could delay executions across the United States. Europe says "gently caress You!" to US executions and good on them for doing so. But for the love of god, don't read the comments section after the article. "Like most other European countries, however, Italy does not have capital punishment and opposes the death penalty" Out of 50 European countries, only 2 still have the death penalty on the books: Belarus and Latvia. In Latvia, it only applies for crimes committed during war time. Belarus did execute two people last year, but currently have noone awaiting execution. But it's not all good news: quote:But California, which placed an order for 521 grams of the drug before the ban, filed a notice in federal court Friday that the order had been received. The state's lethal injection protocol calls for preparation of 3 grams of the drug for execution, along with 3 grams on a backup tray. Prisons spokeswoman Terry Thornton said portions of the drug are also used for training. California has enough of the stuff to kill anywhere between 86 and 172 people and Oklahoma is adding insult to injury by using drugs designed for animals. Megillah Gorilla fucked around with this message at 13:57 on Jan 23, 2011 |
# ¿ Jan 23, 2011 13:50 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 06:24 |
|
Boy accused of murder when he was 11 years old faces life without possibility of parole Naturally, the state is also trying him as an adult. Certainly, when I think of an 11 year old I think of a mature adult. In the entire world, only the US and Somalia sentence children to life without possibility of parole. In Pennsylvania, all children are tried as adults by default unless a judge orders otherwise. And because you can't have this sort of case happen without some sadistic icing on the cake: quote:When he was first presented to court Brown was made to wear shackles around his wrists and ankles. Look at him, how could you even explain to someone that young what "the rest of your life" means? Megillah Gorilla fucked around with this message at 01:53 on Jan 27, 2011 |
# ¿ Jan 27, 2011 01:50 |
|
I have massive problems with the idea of prisons being run for profit by private enterprise. But mental hospitals, too? That's beyond morbid. Mental hospitals are there to help the most desperately needful members of society, they should never be run for profit. It's sickening. It's monstrous. EDIT - To clarify, I don't have problems with private mental health clinics. Removing public facilities altogether is what I have problems with. Megillah Gorilla fucked around with this message at 05:07 on Feb 27, 2011 |
# ¿ Feb 27, 2011 05:05 |
|
Ah yes, the incredible evil of spending $218 per inmate per month on food. Or around $7 a day. The reason the meals are so good in prison is that the prisoners cooking them are usually actual chefs and making inventive meals is their only release from what is otherwise a very unpleasant existence.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2011 02:49 |
|
Yes, Australian prisons. The article I was replying to was from one of the lovely local newspapers designed for the knee-jerk segment of the population. It's all 'foreigners taking our jobs', 'boat people overrunning the country, why doesn't the navy sink them', and Andrew Bolt. He's Australia's very own Glen Beck, but without the charm.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2011 00:45 |
|
JustNorse posted:I’m Norwegian, so using this thread to ask something I’ve been wondering about – how does it work for people when they get out of prison, be it on probation or on a full release? I’m especially thinking of getting back in a job. Do all jobs require them to check some box on a paper saying that they have done time? And how far will that block them from getting a job? I can only speak for Australia, but for jobs or anything else, like passports, that requires a police check, they only look back 10 years. However, some sensitive jobs ask "Have you ever been convicted of a crime?" without a timeframe. Of course, how they would ever check after the requisite ten years is a mystery to me. Again, if that sort of thing is even legal in Norway, I can't say.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2011 16:58 |
|
Oh, gently caress me.
|
# ¿ May 22, 2011 04:09 |
|
foobyfooby posted:Because somebody has to pay for the drug tests and poo poo (and the state sure as gently caress isn't going to cover it)? He's probably like me and has never heard of people on probation being required to pay for the 'privilege'.
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2011 16:35 |
|
I can't speak for the US, but in Australia a background check doesn't name the crime at all. You get a 'yes' or 'no' to whether the person had been convicted of anything in the last ten years and that's it. So the crime itself is immaterial; murder, rape or too many parking tickets - all will ensure you don't get that job.
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2011 05:23 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Feds: Mississippi county runs 'school-to-prison pipeline' This has been going on for a while now, but it looks like Mississippi has taken it to a new level. quote:The alleged mistreatment included youngsters being "crammed into small, filthy cells and tormented with the arbitrary use of Mace as a punishment for even the most minor infractions -- such as 'talking too much' And to make it as plain as I can - these are highschool kids who have been thrown in jail for playing up at school.
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2012 04:15 |
|
It really is a massive divide in society. At its simplest, one part wants to live in a world where we help each other. The other wants a world based on suffering.
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2012 04:40 |
|
Gourd of Taste posted:Do you not know about supervision costs? People pay to be on parole. Unless you live in a civilised country. Paying to be on parole is a loving monstrous idea. Is there any country besides the US that forces people to do this?
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2013 14:37 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 06:24 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Isn't part of this the case that literally every other first world nation has completely removed the death penalty? I know it's falling out of favor in the U.S. too but you have also have states that just really, really adore killing people. Also California: quote:U.S. appeals court rejects challenge to California death penalty The state of California is now free to start killing people again.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2015 14:27 |