|
Ruddha posted:Good.
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2014 18:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 02:31 |
|
gently caress it, let's get meta.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2014 14:16 |
|
"Tumblr is already seething about this" A sentence that belongs nowhere anyone can read it.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2014 04:49 |
|
PriorMarcus posted:That attitude is basically all consuming in CD. It's loving abysmal to read anything or post there.
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2014 14:44 |
|
If they cared they'd write better reviews.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2014 06:57 |
|
That was somehow less funny than the real thing.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2014 10:17 |
|
Effectronica posted:So does it make equal amounts of sense for Casablanca to be interpreted as:
|
# ¿ Oct 17, 2014 03:11 |
|
There's nothing wrong even with unserious readings, it's just if you're going to do that you need to have a sense of humor (which CR doesn't any more) and not come across like you think yours is the One True Reading. Also CR is meant to be reviews not critical interpretations, so this is all irrelevant bullshit that walks right around the many reasons CR sucks, such as "they don't review movies" and "the 'reviews' are pretentious, self-serious garbage".
|
# ¿ Oct 17, 2014 04:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 02:31 |
|
Black Bones posted:Dude, you gotta say something like "Deal" or "Challenge accepted m'lady", otherwise how am I supposed to know you've agreed to the terms? sub supau fucked around with this message at 07:06 on Oct 17, 2014 |
# ¿ Oct 17, 2014 07:04 |