|
So Haswell isn't going to overclock any better than Ivy Bridge? That's a bit disappointing.
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2013 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
Combat Pretzel posted:I guess those benchmarks from a while ago were a figment of our imagination. LooKMaN posted:It is, here's an example of DDR3 vs DDR4, DDR4 wins at every test: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/70775-intel-skylake-ddr3-vs-ddr4-comparison-4.html the article posted:in most home-use cases users won't see one bit of difference 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 29, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
Has there been any talk about pairing CPUs with HBM/HMC? PerrineClostermann posted:What the hell is Skylake-E going to have that necessitates such a huge socket? 6 channel memory has got to be a big part of the reason.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:There will be no six core Kaby Lake. You're gonna have to wait until Coffee Lake for that, est Q4 2017, but chances are Intel will bullshit up a new socket just for that. So Coffee Lake is yet another 14nm refinement which will be sold alongside 10nm Cannonlake. If Coffee Lake gets 6 cores, will Cannonlake?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
PerrineClostermann posted:Would a 3D printed delidder be strong enough to withstand multiple deliddings? The typical filament used is pretty weak structurally, isn't it? One of the related vids is the same tool made with poo poo materials failing. They don't show the aftermath but the plastic of the tool gives before the lid pops.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Confusion posted:Itanium was also intended as Intels chip to transition to 64 bit. Its failure gave AMD the opportunity to jump in and set the de facto industry standard with x86-64, which Intel now has to license from them. It was a humiliating failure for Intel, and it will be long before they try something like it again. Well sure, they need to wait until we need 128 bit computing 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
As I recall the capacities were really low too, to the point where NVRAM is a better option for the moment.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 20, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
EoRaptor posted:Cannon Lake 10nm is going to start as a Xeon brand and work its way down to consumer, instead of the usual consumer variants first. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/02/intel-coffee-lake-14nm-release-date/ Given they've targeted mobile first with their last few releases, presumably because of the power savings, could this mean the 10nm process doesn't have significantly less power use than 14nm?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:maybe SATA4 will come out of development hell by then To what end given NVMe exists?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
redeyes posted:Make sure and get a 1x 12v rail model. You do not want the older multiple 12v rail ones with modern video cards. Why's that? Also is it going to make a difference with a 150W card like the 1070?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
Cygni posted:The latest leaks are that 10nm CPUs wont come from intel in the desktop space until 2019 at the earliest. Considering the 10nm process completely failed for intel and they are already building out their 7nm process instead, its probably going to be a rough few years for them ahead.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
eames posted:That'd be interesting as an unlocked K version, 7700K performance with an i3 at half the price. lol the logo looks like an eagle flexing.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2017 13:08
|
|
|
wargames posted:So ram speed is more important then clock speed? gently caress, good spot.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
redeyes posted:I really think it's worth waiting till next summer to invest in something greater than 4 cores. Intel and AMD are battling hardcore right now and the only winners are nerds. This summer was the tipping point for major multiprocessor gains and first generation is a bitch to buy into. At the start of the year I assumed next Summer would be a good time to buy since 10nm would be on the market but since it'll be mobile only initially, it could be a good while longer before we get a proper second gen of reasonably priced >4 core desktop chips.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2017 11:59
|
|
|
Gyrotica posted:I'm on a 4770k and Coffee Lake 8C is likely to be the last big release before a child begins to siphon away all the money, so that'll be my next upgrade. That child will have started school before a fast 8 core chip needs to be replaced.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2017 07:46
|
|
|
Optane is for people who want an in memory database but can't afford the RAM. The cost isn't worth it for typical desktop use.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 13:31
|
|
|
Has there been any news about when PCIe 4 will be supported by Intel/MB manufacturers yet? It was standardised quite a while ago at this stage.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2018 12:24
|
|
|
Cygni posted:For consumer market, I think I read 2020. Same time as DDR5. That would be at least 2 1/2 years after standardisation. Seems excessive compared to the time to market of PCIe 3.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2018 21:49
|
|
|
Gamers Nexus had a video on that topic which amounted to "if they were going to go that far, they may as well solder". I think part of the issue is liquid metal could be shaken free of where it's supposed to be during transit.
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2018 22:03
|
|
|
Avalanche posted:Sorry for the laymen questions ahead of time, but there's some really interesting poo poo in this thread: The Mill shall vanquish all lesser architectures.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2018 19:54
|
|
|
BobHoward posted:LOL they still can't attract VC so they can't afford to pay anyone
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2018 10:47
|
|
|
Cygni posted:whatever this is i hate it It turns out the heat flux of a Xeon overclocked to 5GHz and the space shuttle's heat shield are in the same ballpark.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2018 15:11
|
|
|
Seems like they'll ship with PCI-e 4 too by the looks of things. Though no wonder Intel keep bumping the core count if they don't expect 10 nm to arrive in earnest for close to another 2 years.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
JnnyThndrs posted:3770K’s are even more absurd, they’re running about $175 on fleabay, which is half of what they ran new, in 2012. That’s insane. Yeah, compare the difference 6 years made in the 90s. What value would a 66MHz 486 from 93 have compared to a 733MHz P3 in 99? Admittedly it's nice not to have to upgrade every 2 years.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2018 12:58
|
|
|
wargames posted:their sub 10nm isn't going to be silicon based we think but does require EUV which is suppose to be solved with 10nm. wait what? I didn't think the move off silicon was due for another few years yet
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2018 10:44
|
|
|
Llyd posted:I was planning on buying a 9700k/9600k to finally replace my 2500k and get some of that sweet soldered goodness but the prices here are mad: 9900k only €10 more than a 9700k? Bargain!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2018 12:11
|
|
)
|
Guess who's gluing a bunch of chips together for their next server CPU? 48 core 12 channel Xeons. TDP should be a laugh.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2018 08:43
|
|
|
Interesting that Intel pushed the "whole separate team" angle. They're probably trying to invoke the memory of recovering from Netburst due to the work of the Core team. Also not giving an actual time frame for 7nm is a complete tease.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2018 22:01
|
|
|
But... female on blower  
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2018 23:10
|
|
|
28 cores at 5GHz is real. Availability is a different matter.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2019 08:44
|
|
|
Looking forward to Intel charging extra for non-HT CPUs now that it's a security benefit.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2019 22:14
|
|
|
Kazinsal posted:Can't wait to hear Paul explain why this is a good thing for Intel and how it utterly destroys AMD in all aspects 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 28, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
sauer kraut posted:GN has gotten off track lately with crap like ^^that, LN cooling and collaborating with Roman. Hello. Did you know you don't have to watch every video on a channel? It's possible to only click on those ones you're interested in. Well, goodbye.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2019 22:34
|
|
|
So SSE and AVX are distinguished from VLIW by the former being a single vectorised instruction and the latter being (potentially) a mix of instructions? Was anything in Itanium's design salvageable for x86?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2019 11:34
|
|
|
Look if they're calling it 14nm++, couldn't they just shorten it to 15nm?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2019 22:10
|
|
|
Deuce posted:They're gonna start calling their non-HT lines security edition or some poo poo. 
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
MaxxBot posted:Meanwhile TSMC is already starting N7+ volume production 5nm volume in Q1 2020, loving wild.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2019 21:00
|
|
|
NewFatMike posted:Separate threads are important because you can address a lot of platfrom specific things and troubleshooting and component guides. Don't forget, more threads = better than.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2019 18:55
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:If you double (yielded) die per wafer and increase costs less than 2x, you have come out ahead. Have there been new developments with this? It seemed to have fallen by the wayside a few years back since lithography has become so expensive and it gets no benefit from bigger wafers.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2019 21:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
crazypenguin posted:I think it's more likely than not that that chip was just the cheapest thing they could get done fast, and without much optimization for power efficiency. Hopefully not because PCIe 6 is already being developed and without efficiency improvements, mobos will have to ship with delta fans to keep cool.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 28, 2020 22:49
|
|