Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Velius
Feb 27, 2001

Robotnik posted:

But, again, I don't give a poo poo what actually happens to Kvothe. I'm sure it (his future) will be fortuitous and a total product of his supreme intellect.

Not to be overly contrary, but did you, you know, read the portions of the book that aren't retrospective? He's a washed up innkeeper, in hiding who is as much despised as the things he fought against. That's one of the more interesting parts of the story - he's brilliant, and yet flawed enough that he's his own worst enemy. Even if the telling of his tale redeems him somehow, he's still hit rock bottom, most of which will likely be his own fault.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

A Nice Boy posted:

I never got this impression at all, nor do I remember reading it. Where'd you come up with it?

There's a point during one of the intervals in the present. The zombie whatever shows up, he tries to set a link to set it on fire or something and nothing happens. Later Chronicler gets jumped in his room by Kvothe's servant/demon friend where he tells him he spread the word to attract someone like him, because Kvothe is burned out, depressed, and basically waiting to die.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

SaviourX posted:

Or there's always the possibility that we've taken literature/writing courses and can perform readings and analyses? :monocle:

You have a history of making extremely smug observations about how poor the writing is in science fiction, typically with airs about how you, unlike everyone else, can actually appreciate what good writing is. Good for you, I guess, but your criticism of a genre that grew out of big ideas and pulp seems misplaced; while good writing and science fiction aren't anathema, the publishing pressure in the genre doesn't promote writing talent over other virtues. If it's such a problem for you that you feel obligated to restate it in thread after thread, perhaps you should stick with literary fiction.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

LoSesMC posted:

Just got my copy! Man I love Amazon...

Jerk. I'm sure my kindle copy won't load until tomorrow.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

Habibi posted:

Exactly, but think of it the other way around - we're basically told that when women want to get pregnant, they make it happen. Combining it with your argument above, we can boil it down to: there's never been a time when a woman - who, incidentally, is having sex several times a day with a variety of different partners - has gotten pregnant despite not 'wanting' it to happen. I imagine that given all the blaise attitude and the amount of humping that goes on, this would be a frequent occurrence, and would lead to questions that can only be explained away with "well you must have wanted it subconsciously" for so long.

Dumb sex talk: Why can't the women also be chewing on the contraceptive plants, such that when they want to get pregnant, they stop eating the plants, and because they're having sex 24/6 they end up pregnant at some point in the future? Since no one's not having sex, the correlation would be quite good. Sex.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

Karnegal posted:

He's still an insufferable douche in the "present" parts. Also, he is depowereed but then goes off and does awesome stuff to reassure the reader that he's still great - killing all the spider-crabs in the first book by himself (a feat which impresses the, apparently, significantly powerful Bast). Hell, he's even set up as THE BEST INNKEEPER EVER. Since almost nothing has happened to advance the plot in two books, I think it's safe to assume this is going to be trilogy number 1 of the Kvothe saga, and I will be immensely surprised if he doesn't regain all/most of his power before this thing is all over. Bast has pretty much made it clear that this is not a permanent thing and he's just working on getting Kvothe back to how he used to be. At which point, he'll still be in his twenties having spent a couple years not being the best at everything. This doesn't really read to me as a washed up character.

The problem with the character is he's good at pretty much everything, he's an arrogant poo poo, and he never grows as a character. 70% of the side characters are more interesting than him, but they all exist only to tell us how awesome Kvothe is or to be mean to him for no reason so he can beat them (proving how awesome he is).

Also, how far are you in WMF? I ask because I think most people agree that TNOTW was the better of the two books, so it's a little weird to see you knock the first and praise the second. TNOTW had more good sections even if a nearly equal amount of nothing happened. But it didn't have Felurian and the Adem, which helps its case a lot.

Going to the Velius quote, what flaws does he have as a character beyond being annoying and arrogant (traits that he clearly still retains in current time indicating no real growth)? Also, how is he washed up? I keep hammering this, but I'm not sure being wealthier than everyone else in his area while having an inn filled with exotic imports and mysterious magical items makes him washed up. If washed up means that he's no longer a magical god (through his innate superiority to boot, not really through earning it via hard work), then I don't really have a lot of sympathy for the guy. He's like a lottery winner who squandered their cash and now has to live a middle class lifestyle (abloo bloo bloo). It might be more believable if we as readers saw much of anything to indicate that he has changed from the Kvothe in the story he is telling. However, most of the shift is simply given to us by Bast via text (he changed so much! I need to fix him!). As readers we have to take his word for it because we aren't shown anything. Bast says that since Chronicler got there (like 99%+ of the story so far) he's been better so again, we're only told that he was broken down, we don't actually see it. If Kvothe has a character flaw it's his arrogance, which isn't actually changed at all between young Kvothe and slightly slightly less young Kvothe. This means his "downfall" is either due to something beyond his control (the magical tree hosed him over), a no win situation he found himself in (who blames someone for a Sophie's choice?), or it was due to his arrogance. If it's the last one and he recognizes this but makes no effort to change his character that makes him an rear end. If he doesn't recognize it, then to him, it's the same to him as if it was a circumstance beyond his control, but we as reads should recognize that he's just being lovely.

Kvothe would have been a lot more interesting if he wasn't such a huge Mary Sue. If I was 12-14 when I was reading this, all of this would probably have been fine for me because I would have been satisfied with a character whose main defining trait was being good at everything so long as there were scenes of baddassness. Wish fulfillment characters aren't necessarily bad, but they are juvenile. My main personal issue with the books is how they get such wild praise as great works of art and are "big L" Literature. In reality, they're middling YA fiction (which is fine, but it isn't what I'm in the market for nor is it what they're sold as.)

I'm sick and abed, and thus not really up to defending a fantasy series I don't feel that strongly about in the first place, at least when we're at the thousand word diatribe level. Accordingly, all I'll say is that your constant references to how Kvothe is an awesome barkeep and is super rich (for the area) and awesome at everything have now made me think of Kvothe as Dalton from Roadhouse. And I don't really have a problem with that.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

Solice Kirsk posted:

Yeah, I don't know. Why does Kvothe skip over pirates and shipwrecks to talk at length about boring loving sex demons? How come you need an individual hair to make a not voodoo doll to perform malfeasance, but he can just stab a random dead dude to kill like 13 other people?

Because one body is really similar to another, a cloth doll is not very similar to a person, I would venture.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

Arkeus posted:

There is also the fact that Fitz Suffers. Onscreen. Not "oh, things might have gone badly offscreen". Moreoever, it also has Fitz constantly evolving thorough the story.

That's actually why I stopped reading the series; it felt like torture porn. How many more ways can Hobb torture Fitz?

Velius
Feb 27, 2001
The more interesting question to me is why a bunch of people who hate the books, who keep parroting how stupifyingly obvious it is that they are awful, somehow find it rewarding to post repeatedly in the thread dedicated to these books about said loathing. It's pretty much every other post in the thread at this point. Don't you have better things to talk about, for example in other threads dedicated to things you enjoy? It's just weird.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Velius
Feb 27, 2001
What's the desired outcome, I wonder? A hope that some new reader, excited about finishing Name of the Wind, opens the thread, and upon seeing "horsefucker420's" thousand word diatribe about how Kvothe sucks, starts crying and reevaluating her taste in literature?

  • Locked thread