Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

adorai posted:

Does anyone really care about "typical" single threaded workloads any more? More and more apps are being written with multithreading in mind, and even desktop computing seems to be moving towards virtualization (see: XP mode). Going forward single thread performance will be less and less important across the board. Most of the money is made in the enterprise, where max memory and number of cores are king.

This is a pretty ignorant (or fanboyish) statement considering that almost all applications that you run, even in a "business environment" are single threaded. Sure some application have specific threads they use for various tasks, but for the parent thread faster is better, always.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

Nonpython posted:

But my computer gets 36 points higher on some stupid artificial benchmark for just $500 more! :smug:

Then why upgrade at all? I can spend 0$ and ignore all benchmarks and still browse the web with windows 95 and internet explorer 3.0. :smugdog:

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
Or if you are an irrational fanboy who doesn't understand that performance per core is more important than more cores.

  • Locked thread