|
Save Russian Jews posted:Honestly, I'd consider shields in 5 rds. the same as betting on shields with no caveats i'm sorry but this sounds insane to me. if shields wins it's going to be by catching a sub in a scramble. he's not going to grind a decision out over gsp. no way, no how.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2011 06:42 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 19:17 |
|
I thought no such thing. I just said his only hope was to catch a miracle sub. While incredibly unlikely, Shields getting the upper hand for an instant and locking up a sub was way more likely than him getting the upper hand for 3+ rounds and winning a decision.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2011 15:25 |
|
My prediction is that people will somehow be surprised yet again when Kongo goes for takedowns yet again. He does it like every time! Wulveslayer!
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2011 22:26 |
|
dude, didn't you hear? wrestling doesn't work on oliveira.
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2011 02:58 |
|
this entire thread is a warning to others
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2011 03:05 |
|
more importantly you bet on a chinese man
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2011 01:35 |
|
Lid posted:He's lost all but his first fight against Alan Belcher at UFC 100 and that was arguably a gift. To be fair he was winning his fight with Chris Leben two rounds to none before he was submitted. From the bottom. By Chris loving Leben. Granted I only ever watched Belcher-Akiyama once but that was probably the most I've ever disagreed with a decision. Complete and utter bullshit as I remember it.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2012 04:21 |
|
JoeRules posted:I know like 5 fighters on the card tonight - anything worth betting besides Franklin? don't buy this card and pretend you won $50
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2012 20:47 |
|
NOOO!!
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2012 02:39 |
|
can you get better than even odds betting on ronda rousey to win in the first round via submission? that seems like a smart thing to do, if so.
|
# ¿ Aug 23, 2012 00:13 |
|
Meme Gambling is a cool thing everyone should do
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2012 02:14 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 19:17 |
|
Fentry posted:200 down on Diaz at +350, gently caress everything I have faith oh dude, surely not?
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2013 22:29 |