|
Jethro Tull posted:When do trusts have to legally send K-1 forms out by? I still haven't gotten mine and it's peeving me off. Depends on what month the trust ends on (maybe December, maybe not). If it's a December year-end, you might not get your K-1 until september, and they've got the legal right to do so. Ask the trustee to check with their CPA and get an estimate.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2011 01:19 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 02:44 |
|
Jethro Tull posted:I know at this point that without the K-1, I won't have to file. I'm pretty close to the limit, though (I've made about 8.5k in scholarships and stuff, not W-2 income per se but still taxable). So if the K-1 on a 50k irrevocable trust puts me above 9.5k (or whatever it is this year), then I will have to file. So it's sort of a sticky situation. Depends on whether the trust is "simple" or "complex" (this can change from year to year). Also depends on how much in withdrawals were taken during the year that would "push out" the trust income to your personal return.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2011 02:34 |
|
Admiral101 posted:Client received a tax notice over a 1099-Q for a state QTP distribution. The recipient of the 1099Q is not the beneficiary, and I'm not sure why she's receiving a notice claiming that she owes tax. Even if the distribution wasn't used for educational purposes (which it was), the tax/penalty is the burden of the beneficiary - not the benefactor. Probably because when it was setup she listed herself as the beneficiary. Probably need to copy the tuition paid, statements, etc. and respond to the CP-2000.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2011 02:36 |
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:Since I wrote most of the OP, I'm going to ask of all things a Turbo Tax question! Holy crap, what a pain in the butt. I'd do it right, since you don't want have to argue why the basis is changing from year-to-year if audited. Or you might change the percentage down the road and need the official amounts.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2011 02:38 |
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:Unfortunately that’s probably true in a lot of cases. My primary job is managing the day to day operations of my credit union’s credit card program. We charge 10.25% and no fees for cash advances on platinum. Even our classic isn’t that bad at 14.99%, still no fees. To me that seems high, but I often forget how truly awful a lot of the big banks are. Considering he can't scrape up the $2k he owes, I'm going to venture he might not have a platinum card.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2011 17:01 |
|
Pope Mobile posted:Hmm, thanks for the info. The smart thing to do would be tightening my belt and paying it all off. Shocking concept!
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2011 22:59 |
|
WrongWay Feldman posted:I guess this is the place to ask. A) Be honest and report the income anyway, since that is what you're legally required to do. B) Don't be honest and cheat on your taxes. There you go.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2011 02:21 |
|
Zantie posted:I have a question about if my husband and I need to amend our 2010 return due to a late 1099-MISC form he just got. The IRS computers tie the gross receipts listed on sch. C to the total nonemployee compensation listed on Box 7, Form 1099-MISC. As long as the gross receipts listed on C are over the 1099 totals you're fine.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2011 19:58 |
|
KennyG posted:To answer your question more directly, you'd get audited. Likely a paper audit, but possibly a full one. Assuming everything else is above board too, you're ok. I believe the ultimate arbitor of penalties is the tax paid. http://books.google.com/books?id=YZ...mistake&f=false says there is no precedent in the US Tax Code for a penalty of a harmless error in a previous year which created an error in a subsequent year. Wow, where did this come from? More realistic approach of under-reporting is a CP2000 matching notice and automatic calculation of tax owed. No need to frighten the poor person to death.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2011 01:19 |
|
furushotakeru posted:What CP2000 notice? The income on the 1099 in question was already included on the schedule C. I know, but even if it didn't, haven't seen too many audits start from a matching notice. In fact, I haven't seen many audits at all. I do around 1,000 returns a year (business, trust, personal) and we had four audits last year, of which two were from another CPA I bought out filing the wrong forms.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2011 20:34 |
|
furushotakeru posted:Audits are almost never random, they only audit your return if they think there is something to find. We got stuck with a training audit this year. "Why are you auditing our client?" "To train our new agent." Gotta learn somewhere, I guess.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2011 01:19 |
|
KennyG posted:
Hey, it's less than that, two weren't my fault!
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2011 01:20 |
|
furushotakeru posted:The local IRS office (San Jose) puts on "practitioner liaison meetings" three times a year, hosted by the Mission Society of Enrolled Agents. These meetings are usually attended by district and regional level management from the IRS. In talking to the ones up here in Portland, most of the "small business" agents they hired last year have all quit.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2011 16:46 |
|
furushotakeru posted:The enforcement budget of the IRS has grown significantly every year for some time now. *cough* government unions *cough*
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2011 22:27 |
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:On it's face, it seems illogical that you could take the full $8000 product cost to qualify for the credit when you paid $3500, but it seems you can. Insurance settlements on your personal property are not taxable except to the extent you realize a gain. (ie, you bought the house for $30,000 and they paid you $40,000, 10K is gain). Barring that, it's money and money is fungible. I'm curious if anyone has a different interpretation, but I would take all of it. I'm going to disagree on this one, since your out-of-pocket costs are only $3,500. But it's not my return.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2011 21:12 |
|
Gimbal_Machine posted:Just wondering why you'd go with this? Is it just the 'safe play'? If I had kept the money and done the work myself and bought a new car then installed new windows at a later time using 8k of my own money, I would be able to make the deduction, right? Seems logical to me that the decision to spend the insurance proceeds on energy upgrades was my decision to make, no? If you'd kept the money and bought a new car the amount spend on the new car would be taxable income to you through the involuntary conversion rules.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2011 19:41 |
|
furushotakeru posted:Just since Abbi didn't really explain what he meant by involuntary conversion rules: the money paid by the insurance company is only non taxable if you use it to replace or repair the property that they were paying the claim for. However, you do have I think 18 months from the loss to spend it before it becomes income. Ninja edit - some is three years, some is two years after the close of the first tax year. AbbiTheDog fucked around with this message at 21:37 on Mar 21, 2011 |
# ¿ Mar 21, 2011 21:35 |
|
Gimbal_Machine posted:Right, I understand. Thanks to you both for your opinions. Helpful to see what pros think If my firm was doing your taxes, I'd tell you to use the smaller amount. If it was my own return, I'd still use the smaller amount. If I was preparing Furu's return, I'd ignore it, because big pink talking things don't deserve tax credits. Your milage may vary.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2011 23:55 |
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:Your losses offset your gains. Watch out for wash-loss sales.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2011 03:04 |
|
No longer stickied? For shame, mods. For shame.
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2011 23:22 |
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:Fixed. How did that happen? Do we want to have poo poo post icon? The dancing pig seems more appropriate. Like a little piggy bank.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2011 19:46 |
|
furushotakeru posted:I believe with HRB pricing also varies by region and by date. This close to the deadline I imagine that the rates are jacked up a bunch. I could be wrong about this though. It's called "value billing," bitches.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2011 22:45 |
|
Pinkied_Brain posted:Can someone explain this AMT business for me? Assuming incentive stock option (ISO)? If ISO, you have AMT income for the difference on the amount you paid versus the value of the stock. Report on Form 6251. You then have a higher AMT basis on your stock vs. regular tax for when you eventually sell the stock. You need to hold the ISO stock for two years to get the best tax treatment, otherwise you have a disqualifying disposition (may be ordinary income). Translation - might want to pay someone to do your taxes this year. Git 'r' dun. Ninja edit - if you do trigger AMT due to this, I believe they've changed the code so you can get an AMT credit carryforward for use in later years (timing difference, not permanent difference). Form 8801.
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2011 01:16 |
|
Surreal Windmill posted:It's all very frustrating I really don't understand why my bank couldnt allow it to just go into savings or checkings or whatever I don't care it's the same person. It's because banks and tax preparers get sued for silly little poo poo like this, especially if the money goes into the wrong account and the owner won't give it back.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2011 03:26 |
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:Maybe there is a phone app that does it? There are apps that do this, haven't tried any of them though. Trying to convince my clients to give it a shot.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2011 18:37 |
|
taqueso posted:I am a newbie small business owner. 2009 was a loss, 2010 we had a profit and I had not been filing any estimated tax because everything looked like it was going to be near break-even. I am going to be paying estimated tax for 2011. No. In fact, it's better, because no matter when you make the withholding it's treated as being paid in all year, as opposed to the estimates, which are date-dependant. Example: Come December, you find out you forgot your estimates (oh crap!). If you pay the 4th quarter estimate for the $10,000, you get nailed with underpayment interest for being underpaid all year. You do the same $10,000 through your w-2, bingo! No interest charge. Same payment. IT'S TAX MAGIC
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2011 16:30 |
|
entris posted:Do owners of LLCs, or partners in a partnership, have the option of withholding? Something in my brain is tingling about owners of small businesses who try to treat themselves as employees, and give themselves a W-2 instead of a K-1, and who try to do withholding rather than making estimated payments. S Corp owners are probably taking a W-2 already and can adjust their withholdings. LLC/LLP/partnership owners are BANNED from taking payroll and need to do estimated coupons.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2011 23:36 |
|
furushotakeru posted:I have no idea. Unlike with an S Corp you still pay self employment tax on any profit in the company so there isn't really any benefit to doing this other than having withholding. Unemployment.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2011 16:22 |
|
poppingseagull posted:I had a stint for a few months as 1099-MISC. I'm an idiot and just checked the form they sent. Non-employee comp shows $2000. According to my records I was paid $14,800. You should go off what you actually collected, not what the form said. The IRS uses the 1099s to tie out to your tax return (eg, if the 1099 says $2,000 and you report $1,000 gross, you'll get a matching notice). If you report more than what the IRS receives in 1099s you will not get a matching notice.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2011 18:12 |
|
2 1/2 hours before I shut my door, go home, and get drunk. ARRRGHH what a year.
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2011 22:26 |
|
Alfalfa posted:I run a small LLC/S-Corp business in which my wife and I are equal "partners" in it. You need to be filing Form 1120s (due March 15th every year) for the business. This will "spit out" a form K-1 which will list you and your wife's share of the profit/loss. You're two years late (2009 and 2010), and the IRS levies a per-shareholder, per-month penalty. You can get one year waived if you ask nicely (I'd recommend 2009, as it will be highest) but you're stuck with the 2010 penalty. You pay yourself "market wages" (up for interpretation) on a paystub, and any extra money you take out as a distribution (NOT a dividend). Difference is distributions are not subject to payroll/self-employment taxes (saves around 15%). Edit - Keep trying to find a professional - you need professional help, but try a smaller firm/sole practitioner (or LTC, they do a fine job as well). Or start looking in May/June, as we all could use some summer work.
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2011 16:22 |
|
furushotakeru posted:Hey look Abbi, Intuit's VP of professional products recorded a nice video to tell us how much they "appreciate" our business. Then they released next year's pricing and are waiting for us to bend over and take it up the shorts like they do every year. I paid a grand total of $20k last year for it....grrrr......
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2011 22:31 |
|
Missing Donut posted:Are you actually paying more than you would for CCH Prosystems? I sure hope it's worth it. Learning curve is my issue. I have 4-5 staff who have been using it for years, we're paperless with the DMS program, yadda yadda yadda. And they know it. Ever since they were bought by intuit the drat program suffers from feature creep and bloat. I DON'T WANT TO INSTALL THE TEN OTHER THINGS YOU'RE TRYING TO SELL ME.
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2011 16:54 |
|
entris posted:So, my study buddy and I were reviewing "advanced" partnership tax topics for our exam in two weeks. We both noted that all of our instructional materials use examples that are basically pulled from the regs, and we both thought it would be cool if there were other problems, with answers, that we could study from. OTJ
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2011 21:25 |
|
powermac posted:I got a certified letter, never picked it up. In between moving, and working at a startup. Ugh, I bet it was from the IRS. I wonder if it was just that they were going to intercept my tax refund. Well, there's your levy notice. And they would have sent you a ton of notices prior to the certified one notifying you of their intent to levy.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2011 18:04 |
|
scribe jones posted:Friend of mine filled out her check to the Oregon DOR wrong, and ended up shorting them by eleven bucks. Should she go ahead and send a new check, or wait for them to bill her? The bill will come pretty quick (within a week or so). Might as well wait, so she can pay all the penalties/interest the first time.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2011 22:05 |
|
kaishek posted:Correct, Turbo Tax will use any information you provide from 1098-Ts to calculate any student credits, etc, you may get. In fact, if you tell it you're a student at any point it will specifically prompt you to enter your 1098T. These numbers might not be wholly accurate, since the timing of when you made the payments might not tie out to when the college invoiced you for classes. Plus, some of your other out-of-pocket expenses and fees might not be included on here.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2011 16:32 |
|
Hillridge posted:Are there restrictions on how much/what I can donate to a 501c3 if I'm a board member of that 501c3? If the value of the truck is over $500 the non-profit needs to issue you a 1098-C for the value of the donated auto. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1098c.pdf I'd see no problem with you doing this. The "Self-dealing" rules tend to be more payroll/rent/interest related that accepting donations from an officer.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2011 16:34 |
|
TraderStav posted:I just purchased a new home and am renting out my existing. I have a question on how the rental income is treated. Do I add the gross amount to my taxes, or would I only be adding the difference between what I receive, and what I pay to the mortgage company? Be careful, if your old home (new rental) is worth more than you paid for it, and you rent it for too long, you might lose the home gain exclusion when you sell it.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2011 19:58 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 02:44 |
|
TraderStav posted:Excellent, thank you for the very detailed response. This has given my a lot to think about and I am glad that I am armed with the accurate situation... Not sure if "tricksy marketing" goes along with CPA, but oh well. We're not that clever. I'd ask someone besides your boss in this case for a referral, he probably uses someone that costs a heck of a lot more than what you can/will pay. If you have an investment advisor, ask them first, and then check with your friends/family. For non-return items, an hourly charge is typical. It's not as bad as with lawyers, but if you've never retained the services of a professional before be aware there will be some sticker shock. What you're looking for is more of a "certified financial planner" (CFP) type person - some CPAs have both and charge accordingly. You might get the same kind of advice in this matter from a non-CPA, and the CFPs that do this tend to be financial advisors (stock brokers). It's monday morning and I'm rambling, so let me know if you need some more clarification.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2011 16:49 |