|
Shalebridge Cradle posted:What do people think Obama has actually done? I can't think of a single thing this administration has done that's remotely collectivist, let alone tyrannically socialist? I really never understand this kind of argument, and its not even confined to the crazy right wing internet anymore even Mitt Romney is saying this kind of thing. Really, that's all they need. The socialism thing was thrown at Clinton too, sure, but it was never embraced by the GOP in the way that it has been with regard to Obama. You can't just say "I don't like the president because I'm a racist", though, especially because most of them don't even think they are racist. So they have to totally fabricate something that they perceive to be a flaw to have something to cry about. I would love to know of a single thing that Obama has done as president that hasn't been supported by moderate Republicans in the past. If I was a Republican, I'd be loving delighted. Bryter fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Feb 8, 2012 |
# ¿ Feb 8, 2012 16:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 16:09 |
|
Bruce Leroy posted:How does a "young person that isn’t anywhere close to retirement" get Social Security benefits?
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2012 12:25 |
|
Bruce Leroy posted:Ok, I always considered unemployment insurance to be a separate thing.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2012 15:25 |
|
cheerfullydrab posted:That's not a good view to hold at all. The people who write these letters are, despite their twisted views, American citizens. We have to live with people who hold political views opposite ours, no matter how loving insane they are. We also have to accept that they are also tax-paying and voting members of our country. Calling such people crazy is just one way to otherize them in a dangerous way. We're all Americans, together, whether we like it or not. Personally I hate like poison people who write letters such as that. Even if you disagree with them, at least please respect them as American citizens. I'm saying this as a former LF poster. Please. Sharing a landmass with someone is not a sufficient basis for pretending to find their views palatable.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2012 16:14 |
|
Judeccahedron posted:There's a very broad line between "find[ing someone's] views palatable" and saying that anyone who has an opinion you disagree with should be institutionalized, though. Obviously, if you disagree with the person, you are free to do so, but the notion of "this guy who thinks this should be sent to the nuthouse" has rather nasty implications.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2012 16:52 |
|
cheerfullydrab posted:If you're so against the idea of not calling humans with opposing, ridiculous views completely insane people who deserve to be institutionalized because you share the same landmass with them, at least try and think that they're still human beings. Rational, reasonable human beings who are completely loving nuts.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2012 18:14 |
|
Bruce Leroy posted:If we seek the reason behind the great disparities in wealth that the Occupy crowd is howling about, we need look no further than the collapse of marriage.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2012 14:23 |
|
Google "ignorant rear end in a top hat".
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2012 08:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 16:09 |
|
Imagine being the kind of person who thinks the golden age of the ACLU was when they were defending Nazis, Ollie North, and tobacco companies...
|
# ¿ Nov 7, 2016 04:16 |