|
Neu posted:What? It saves quite a bit of space having them on top. When the window is maximized.
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2011 04:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:52 |
|
|
Scoobi posted:Really annoying. Had to back up to 6.0 That's probably not going to help; it's been this way since 4.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2011 23:15
|
|
|
I've just upgraded to 8.0 beta and this is the first beta I've had since I hopped on 6 that has been buggy. I've had sprint.com's Javascript cause it to time out, and just now it insisted I had a URL open in another tab, and I did not.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2011 20:33
|
|
|
efb
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2012 14:29
|
|
|
Alereon posted:Firefox suffers more than other browsers from anything that impacts the speed at which it can access the disk, because it has more stuff to do when it closes and a lot of I/O happens on the main thread.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2012 20:33
|
|
|
HalloKitty posted:Best right click menu option ever. Best part: It's not even "search Google". It's "search using whatever engine you have picked in your search bar at this moment." Which is usually Google, yes, but could be Amazon, Wikipedia, etc.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2012 16:14
|
|
|
I'm enjoying the cat drugs, and actually it has educated me about our own site. For example, most other professional sites you'll see just layer upon layer of blue DIVs. Ours? Four nested red tables, all four taking up nearly the entire page. :facepalm:
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2012 14:58
|
|
|
What I like about that is the random couple of divs in the middle. In fact, my favorite part about this is the colorcoding that lets me easily see where the divs and tables are. Also how it shifts from tables only, to tables nested in divs. So, on a modern PC, would we really gain any performance by streamlining these pages? Or is it simply a matter of making it more maintainable in general, getting away from the horror of nested tables?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2012 15:47
|
|
|
HalloKitty posted:Apparently the internet is some kind of hearty but extremely trippy layered cake: Where did that bar on the left come from?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2012 15:51
|
|
|
butts! posted:What is really intriguing me is the top four large layers are all very gridded. Those aren't individual layers, they're made up of dozens of bricks.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2012 16:20
|
|
|
NOTinuyasha posted:Post hot div pics and the tablest ticketing systems u got  Mother of god.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2012 04:43
|
|
|
What's really interesting is to look at the huge professional public-facing sites: MSNBC, CNN, etc. The towers are almost all blue divs, nary a red table to be found. (Looks like the tables tend to either be for actual tabular data, or for third party advertisements) The bedrock of Gmail is *21* nested divs.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2012 14:48
|
|
|
I apparently am on 12.0 beta, and I have a complaint. Before, I could open a new tab and hit 'for' and it would autofill "forums.somethingawful.com/usercp.php". Now, it only autofills "forums.somethingawful.com/", which is very annoying. Anyone know if there's a setting to undo this change?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2012 14:50
|
|
|
Alereon posted:Wladimir Palant, Adblock Plus author, has posted a new experimental extension called "Suspend Background Tabs". It's being jokingly called "Lagblock Plus". The goal is to reduce/eliminate CPU usage by unfocused tabs, improving responsiveness and reducing jerkiness (jank) in the active tab. This is a prototype of technology coming to Firefox in a future version. It has some workarounds to let Youtube videos and such keep playing when you move to a different tab, but if you have problems you can pin your tab as an app tab, then check the "Don't suspend pinned app tabs" option in the Add-On options. It would be nice for Firefox to have, or an addon to supply, the opposite. The change a few versions ago where JavaScript timers stop or slow down when you're not on the active tab, I'd like to be able to have the ad-hoc option to not do that. It's annoying to have to sit through a timer, or have to go to another window, because going to another tab pauses the timer.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2012 17:09
|
|
|
Every time I want to come to the forums, I hit ctrl-L, 'for', down, enter. Annoyed at having to hit 'down' now but whatever. I apparently accidentally deleted the "http://forums.somethingawful.com/usercp.php" entry from my awesomebar while aiming for something else. How do I force it to come back? I've opened that link dozens of times since then and it just doesn't want to show up at the top.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2012 14:31
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:I think you need to type the specific shortcut for the awesomebar to remember it. It's not a simple string search, because for me 'for' does nothing since I open SA by typing 'u' (initially I typed 'usercp', then as the pattern established itself it needed fewer letters). OK, this is starting to work. Thanks. Edit: Yay, it worked after about 6 tries. Each time it took fewer letters to get it to show up at the top.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2012 14:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:52 |
|
|
Question Mark Mound posted:Why not add the forums as a bookmark then give it a keyword? That was, you only have to hit ctrl+L, type in a few letters (e.g. "sa") then hit enter. I had it bookmarked but it hadn't occurred to me to use a keyword, even though I use those for searching. Thanks, that's a good idea.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2012 15:23
|
|