Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

I find it hard to believe that people will willingly give up their luxuries, even in the face of disaster. At any point in time, they will always say that the cost is too much, and that their changes wouldn't make any difference. Any changes we make in the short term will make life significantly more unpleasant, and any benefit will be long off. You have to give cars, planes, cheap and reliable power, cheap products, most foods, and lots of other things we associate with a high quality of life. Things might get better in the long run as we learn to cope, but thats a maybe vs a certainty of a lowered standard of living now. The people who will most affected by climate change are the poorest, and thus those with the least power to change anything (since they have have the least to give up).

If we are posting our favorite depression inducing links
http://energybulletin.net/
http://www.postcarbon.org/
http://fateoftheworld.net/
http://transitionus.org/

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

Krabsworth posted:

So what? Can we hope all the protests around the world turn into civilization destroying revolutions? Factories come to a stand still as we destroy each other in the streets because we have no food, etc.? I realize things are going to get bad, but something comforts me that at least some humans will survive this, we'll just be in smaller numbers, right?

Its probably likely that we'll mostly all survive, just in an increasingly polluted and unstable world.

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

I consider myself an environmentalist in that I care about the long term preservation of environmental systems. I have absolutely no sympathy for the arguments put forth for industrial apologists. At the same time, I basically have no desire to engage with the environmentalist left. Partly it is the reflexive anti-nuclear position, but also there are just so many cranks who engage with magical thinking about just everything. I've seen ostensibly environmentally oriented groups obsessed with anti-wifi and anti vaccine mania, and I find the whole permaculture/local food movements to be unwilling to engage the scale of modern civilization. I'm not sure how to connect with these people without turning away in disgust.

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

lapse posted:

I was going through my old poo poo and found a cool chart that shows the relative scale of different power sources and what we use the energy on.

Might have found this on SA originally, I don't remember. It's not actually labeled, but based on the size of the "nuclear" bar this appears to be US-only.



Also gives you an idea of why the auto fleet is one of the most effective targets for reducing emissions.

Those come from here. https://flowcharts.llnl.gov/

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

McDowell posted:

Who has an economic interest in climate change denial?

Death to Fossil Fuels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNdhFi3MHZQ

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

Time to plant more white daisies.

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

Countdown until someone unironically proposes nuclear winter as a solution.

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003


I'm aware of that. I want to see people propose going all out nuclear.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

The most realistic way to terraform mars is






~~~~~~~~~~======Space wizards======~~~~~~~~~~~


Discussion of terraforming other planets is a joke to ignore the destruction of the one we have.

  • Locked thread