|
GlassEye-Boy posted:Weren't Koreans the ones claiming that Sun Yat Sen was Korean? No.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 05:20 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 21:43 |
|
menino posted:Oh yes they have. They also claim that the Dragon Boat festival is Korean, as are Cherry Blossoms. They also claimed to have been forced into battle by the US in the Vietnam war with nothing but sticks and shields. Yes but who are exactly "they?" Academics? Politicians? Students? Shoe-makers? Butchers? Nationalistic Netizens? The only example I saw of Koreans claiming Confucius as a Korean was from a Japanese program... On the other hand there is a strong push by Chinese academics to include historical peoples that have resided in what is now called "Dongbei" or more commonly known in the West as "Manchuria" as part of Chinese history, this includes the Korean kingdoms of Koguryo and Balhae. Actually I have been to Ji'an, Jilin on a Chinese tour group to visit Koguryo Pyramids and tombs. The tour guides strongly urged us tourists that Koguryo is Chinese history and has no connection with Korea. As an American-trained historian on East Asia, I was very agitated by the claim, especially coming from a government run-site. Here is more background on the The Korea-China History War I think rumors spread around the internet is pretty innocuous as long as the majority of the people aren't gullible. Where I think it becomes dangerous is when governments attempt to form a historical narrative that promotes a skewed nationalistic bent that shits on history for their own petty political gains. Ronald Spiers fucked around with this message at 07:35 on May 9, 2012 |
# ¿ May 9, 2012 07:32 |
|
Donraj posted:I knew a professor, a fairly well-known Confucian scholar, who sat through a conference presentation where a Korean scholar claimed just that. I want to say that the conference was in China, but I'm not sure. Can you substantiate anything about this incident? What are there names and which universities to these folks work for? I would like to read their academic works.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 07:57 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:Whether it's true or not, Koreans have a reputation for making nationalist claims that are a little out there. China and Japan have also been known to make grandiose claims but I think Korea's are often a little weirder because they don't have the obvious historical accomplishments. Yes they were an interesting and at times very innovative people, but I feel like they sometimes, maybe subconsciously, feel the need to lay claim to some things that the Chinese or Japanese wouldn't because they already have that sort of accomplishment in their established history. Again, who are these Koreans that make nationalist claims? And what do they claim that is so grandiose? Any John Doe or Hong Gildong can make a claim, it doesn't mean it is officially accepted by the government or education system or by the general population. You are being way too general. I know Koreans like to talk about their four seasons and their alphabet. But what other claims that you deem is weird? Do Koreans just bring out their national achievements out of the ether when you have conversations with them? Throatwarbler posted:He's talking about the 19th century European idea of a Nation State, as distinct from multi-national, multi-ethnic empires like the Austro-Hungarian, Tsarist Russian, Ottoman and Qing. Notably all 4 of the latter declined precipitously throughout the late 1800s and had ceased to exist by the end of WW1, just as modern nation states like Britain and Japan reached the heights of their power. I thought Britain was a multi-ethnic empire... and it is still a multi-ethnic collection of countries. How was Britain different from the other multi-ethnic empires? The modern naton state of China also pretty much constitutes the same territory and people of Qing China minus half of Mongolia and Taiwan. How would you label the PRC today? A multi-ethnic nation state with Chinese characteristics?
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 19:21 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:
Sounds like a case of spreading false and dangerous rumors! In China you would be censored! I had firsthand account of experiencing nationalistic sentiment in China approved by the local government at a site approved by UNESCO as a world heritage site. Your claims are unfounded generalizations. More concrete examples would be more helpful in the discussion about Asian nationalism(s). I still find the Japanese video of Korea claiming Confucius as Korean to be very suspicious. I've never met a Korean professor that claims that. eSports Chaebol posted:I know that at least one Korean cable station (OnGameNet) would at times have their station watermark change to say "DOKDO IS KOREAN TERRITORY". If this is true I don't see anything crazy about it. Territorial disputes are common among countries. It isn't like claiming a cultural tradition of another culture as one's own. menino posted:Another thing that probalby plays a big part in this "we originated it!" stuff is tourism and the way all of the countries in the region emphasize exports, especially to the West. Lacking a lot of the tropical draws of SE Asia, they all try to compete on historical resonance. Personally I don't think China and Japan need to compete for tourists. They are inherently already enticing tourist destinations considering all the famous historical, natural, and modern sites they have. I have however noticed Korea, Malaysia, and Taiwan tourist boards pushing heavily as a tourist destination. I don't see them promoting ridiculous claims though.
|
# ¿ May 10, 2012 04:12 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:So when did the Chinese start referring to Seoul as 首耳 instead of 汉城 ? 2005 by relevant Chinese bodies. Chinese folks still usually call it Hancheng though.
|
# ¿ May 10, 2012 05:08 |
|
Hey look another Asian island dispute:quote:China travel agencies 'suspend Philippine tours' Personally the Scarborough Shoal looks amazingly close to the Philippines geographically but I do like(meaning I find it amusing) how China claim it based on historical reasons, very much in-line with the previous discussions about the use of history for political ends. Anyone believe there will be future repercussions throughout the region because of the heightening of tensions? China likes to paint itself as someone that doesn't interfere with the internal affairs of other nations(Taiwan excepted) but it seems other smaller neighbors are getting fed up with China. Burma suspended certain projects run by the Chinese. The Spratly Islands has always been contentious with all neighbors. Or will this just blow over?
|
# ¿ May 10, 2012 08:17 |
|
http://www.globaltimes.cn/SPECIALCOVERAGE/SouthChinaSeaConflict.aspx Checkout the map the Chinese media shows for "Huangyan" Island. Pretty hilarious. And further Chinese media opinion about the island: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/photo/2012-05/10/c_131578905_3.htm With the 2008 Russian war with Georgia during the middle of the Olympics and the lack of any response from the West, I wouldn't be surprised if China would do something aggressive militarily to claim this "island."
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 20:51 |
|
Heard this on the radio today: A Tale of Two Brothers: One in China, Other in US It is about two Americans who grew up during the Cultural Revolution. Fascinating how two brothers with similar experiences end up with very different views on China as well as the US.
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 04:05 |
|
Here is an autobiography of Sidney Rittenberg. One of the very few foreigners to join the CCP. He had a heck of a time during the Cultural Revolution. Now he is a consultant for people who want to do business in China.
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 08:17 |
|
Modus Operandi posted:You're right i'm not sure I can call it racism but HK and Singaporean Chinese view themselves as ethnically different and more cultured. I'd compare it to the same way the leading western nationalities used to view the Irish. The Brits used to invent all sorts of race mythology to separate the Irish into a different sub group of "white" comparable with the "negro." HK and Singaporeans view mainland Chinese as ugly, inferior, dumb, etc.. and a whole host of near racist type stereotypes. I wouldn't call the term racism because that would connotate the belief in the superiority of oneself based on race, I would call it prejudices. There are prejudices within mainland China as well. Urban v. rural; Beijing v. everyone else; Cantonese v. "northerners;" native v. migrant; Shanghai v. everyone else; everyone else vs. Henan people, etc. Also Chinese Singaporeans and Chinese Hong Kongers do NOT view the mainland Chinese as "ethnically" different. They all belong to the Han ethnic group or the more generic term "Chinese". Singaporean and HK Chinese may see themselves as more cultured, but not ethnically different from the mainland Chinese.
|
# ¿ May 20, 2012 12:36 |
|
shrike82 posted:I don't think there's any secret to it. Race isn't an issue as long as everyone's doing well economically. And the government's done a great job over the past 4-5 decades. Wasn't it because of racial problems that Singapore left Malaysia?
|
# ¿ May 20, 2012 13:12 |
|
Nigeria has also joined the crackdown parade!quote:Nigeria accuses Chinese traders of 'scavenging' in Kano I also heard the US State Department sent a directive to crackdown on Chinese scholars from teaching pre-collegiate classes in the US.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2012 20:57 |
|
China 'arrests high-level US spy' in Hong Kong - reportsquote:A Chinese security ministry official has been arrested on suspicion of spying for the US and passing on state secrets, Hong Kong media reports say. Good ole CIA using the honeypot trap technique! Doesn't look good for Zhou Yongkang, head of security.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2012 05:14 |
|
Deceitful Penguin posted:Could you elaborate on this? The Marriage Law, at least, was a good thing I thought. I remember Mao stating that "women hold up half the sky." Although I found this amusing: Papers reveal Mao's view of women
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2012 07:55 |
|
Heaven is not pleased with China: China bars stock index web search after Tiananmen match
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2012 05:13 |
|
The ties between Mongolia and Tibet is interesting. I believe it was the Mongols that created the title of Dalai Lama.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2012 08:54 |
|
From my superficial understanding of Thai, there are different sentence ending according to gender.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2012 01:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 21:43 |
|
You would think the Communists would've rectified these sexist characters when they simplified them.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2012 07:27 |