|
The answer is always lol oracle
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2019 20:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 11:28 |
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:The org ended up shelling out for a site license to not deal with Larry's poo poo. Vulture Culture posted:I once had an Oracle rep threaten to sue me because I referred to "the user" of a specific Solaris server while discussing a support extension and she started screaming and accusing me of illegally renting Oracle's technology to other people I like how every time we discuss larry's hobby new horror stories come out.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2019 16:11
|
|
|
Sad Panda posted:My question is why does this happen? My guess is that there's a fundamental difference between the way that Remote Desktop and VNC Viewer react to closing the window, but given you're all much more knowledgable than me in the field I'd love some advice. Actuarial Fables posted:When you created your Windows VM, ESXi attached a virtual monitor. This virtual monitor doesn't ever display anything, but by having it attached the Windows OS will do its part and compose images to be displayed to this fake monitor. Both the ESXi viewer and VNC Viewer use the framebuffer used for the fake monitor to compose their own images for you to see what's going on. This fake monitor is never detached from the OS, so even when you close VNC Viewer the images are still being composed so your script can still monitor for changes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2019 10:57
|
|
|
If there’s 2 slots there’s no reasons at all not to do raid1 and partition your stuff. Splitting it across both drives just ups the failure rate for no good reason.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2019 11:07
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Small price to pay for low cost virtualization hardware.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2019 23:25
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Eh. Depends on what you mean. Xen is far better as an open source lab solution than ESXi. Marinmo posted:I just want cheap, manageable and hopefully performant setup, my list of priorities being in that order too. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 12:17 on Jun 19, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2019 12:14
|
|
|
Read locks usually aren’t exclusive
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
Vulture Culture posted:What's really cool about discussing NFS locking behavior is that locking isn't part of NFSv2/v3 at all, servers don't care whether or not you lock any files whatsoever, and it's implemented through a separate protocol (NLM) that is respected by some but not all NFS clients.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2019 20:07
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 11:28 |
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:This made for some real fun if you ever tried to do multiprotocol access on a NetApp volume since CIFS has mandatory locking and NFS has advisory locking and getting those to play nicely on the same file is basically impossible.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2019 22:24
|
|