|
Bob Morales posted:Wasn't stuff still compiled for 386 (and not say, 686) up until just recently?
|
# ¿ May 2, 2012 14:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 02:06 |
|
Powered Descent posted:Mate is pretty much exactly Gnome 2, with a bunch of names changed around to avoid conflicts. It works exactly like Gnome 2 always has. But there seem to be only four people on the project, and there are some very big jobs ahead of them on their roadmap (like eventually porting everything to GTK3). I wish them luck, but realistically I'd say Mate is more of a stopgap solution than a long-term one.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2012 21:32 |
|
gmq posted:I have one question though, is there anything similar to Photoshop that is not GIMP? I used to use a Windows VM just for Photoshop and I'd like to avoid that this time. There's also MyPaint which seems pretty solid (and it starts up quicker than GIMP).
|
# ¿ May 20, 2012 12:11 |
|
Shane-O-Mac posted:I'm completely new to Ubuntu. I have an older desktop running 12.04, and I'm using it as a media server for a couple HTPC's while also running SABNZBD. What's the best way to decrease power consumption? I've seen things like Jupiter, laptop mode tools, etc, but like I said I'm new to all this. So far I've just tried using the suspend mode, but I noticed that once it suspends my HTPC loses its connection. If you want to decrease power consumption, make sure you have cpufreq and laptop_mode installed. The basic settings should be enough to decrease it quite a lot, and they'll be active immediately after installation IIRC (well, assuming your hardware has support for that kind of stuff).
|
# ¿ May 28, 2012 07:32 |
|
angrytech posted:Youtube flash on my 12.04 system has some weird color inversion going on: blues are red and reds are blue kinda deal. I'd try fixing it, but videos just look so drat cool with crazy trippy colors.
|
# ¿ Jul 13, 2012 17:42 |
|
Craptacular! posted:Given Valve's love of polling people's system configurations in the past, I don't see why they won't see all but the most niche distros. Check the uname -a result if nothing else. Besides, dumping it in /opt is pretty much the standard solution for all non-OSS software.
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2012 18:33 |
|
Worst case, a symlink would probably suffice.
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2012 20:12 |
|
Crayvex posted:Thanks for the clarifications, everyone. I hope that this takes care of my intermittent wireless issues. It will just stop being able to authenticate to my WPA2-PSK home network. I have to delete the wireless config and power off the machine and then upon reboot I can config it and it work fine...for awhile.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2012 18:36 |
|
angrytech posted:I generally always use x64 unless there's a problem that requires x86. Generally it's either driver issues or a 32 bit processor, but I haven't run into that for years now.
|
# ¿ Aug 29, 2012 17:05 |
|
ShadowHawk posted:How would you say Wine in Ubuntu compares? I haven't actually used it in 64-bit ubuntu at all, so I can't say. My experience was mostly based on 64-bit arch. I've actually started dualbooting with the 12.10 alpha, and unity has kinda grown on me to be honest. I like the way you can do most things just by keyboard hotkeys.
|
# ¿ Aug 31, 2012 21:58 |
|
MaterialConceptual posted:Sorry if this has been asked already, but is anyone working on a Cinnamon flavour of Ubuntu? I'm really liking where Cinnamon is going, and I'd like to use something that works out of the box without having to switch to Linux Mint (So I can still use the Ubuntu Software Center etc.).
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2012 15:58 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 02:06 |
|
Craptacular! posted:Firefox, Chromium, etc use the standalone plugin that Adobe abandoned in February. We're heading into a Linux future where you either choose Chrome or an iOS style no-Flash experience on the web. For most mainstream users, this makes Chrome the only browser there is. Flash won't be relevant in a matter of years, but it'll be a most painful transition since Windows and Mac users may continue to be using Flash for some time to come, and the (desktop) web might coddle them long into the night. So no, it's not "chrome or bust", rather "PPAPI-compatible browser or old flash (which still gets security updates from adobe)". E: https://wiki.mozilla.org/NPAPI:Pepper quote:Mozilla is not interested in or working on Pepper at this time. See the Chrome Pepper pages. So firefox doesn't support PPAPI yet. dont skimp on the shrimp fucked around with this message at 17:43 on Nov 4, 2012 |
# ¿ Nov 4, 2012 17:40 |