|
Don't care about whatever drama is brewing: let's talk car insurance! Let's say I have good health insurance through work already, and I'm opting in for collision and comprehensive auto coverage (in addition to liability for injury and property, but that's irrelevant to my question). Why would I ever want UI/UIM? My property damage should be covered by my collision coverage, and my healthcare claims should be covered by my work health plan, right? Along the same lines, why would I want Personal Injury Protection or Medical Payments coverage? That stuff should be covered by my health plan as well...
|
# ¿ Sep 1, 2013 00:30 |
|
|
# ¿ May 6, 2024 04:34 |
|
Jastiger posted:Let's start with Personal Injury Protection (PIP). This is only available in some states, so if you're in a state that has this, PIP is different than simply medical because it also can cover things like lost wages in addition to medical expenses. The value there is that you get that extra coverage. In a lot of those states that offer it, its also often mandatory since it puts some of the risk of an unemployed insured onto an insurance company rather than the state for income during times you can't work. Here's what I got out of this: 1. PIP also covers lost wages. But how is this valuable if I have disability coverage through work? 2. Medical can cover my health insurance deductible and is put into effect before health insurance. How is this valuable if I have a low deductible health plan? 3. Seems like Medical can cover other people in your car, that's one unique benefit (although not valuable to me in particular because I don't drive others around). 4. I still don't understand why UI/UIM is useful. If a car hits me and they have no insurance and I don't have UI/UIM personal property coverage, wouldn't I put in a collision claim and just be out the deductible? I don't see how I would be "out" anything except my collision deductible. I could also use my health insurance (non-auto) for any health expenses, and my disability coverage (non-auto) for time missed from work. It seems like the only thing UI/UIM would be useful for is pain and suffering money, but in practice, wouldn't my health insurance go after (I believe the term is "subrogation?") the limits on my UI/UIM policy and leave me with almost nothing for pain and suffering anyway? The logic here being that if an accident was bad enough to cause me to seek pain and suffering compensation, it was probably bad enough to max out my UI/UIM limits for medical expenses. Let me know how wrong I am! Also, for the record, I currently carry 100/300 UI/UIM, but I'm just curious about the utility.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2013 05:50 |