|
lazer_chicken posted:The cool thing about laserdisc is that, up until the dvd release that contained the original theatrical versions, the laserdisc versions of the original star wars trilogy were regarded as the best. I'm sure true star wars fans have some argument that it's still the best. I have that trilogy. I bought an LD player in the early 90s and joined the Columbia House Laserdisc Club and that was my "introductory three disc" deal. The LD player (made by Radio Shack) still works as good as new. I also have an industrial model Pioneer player.
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2012 20:12 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:28 |
|
olaf2022 posted:Most record players I've seen are capable of playing at 33/45/78 rpm. The 7" records are generally called 45s or singles since the majority of them are 45rpm and have one song per side. There are exceptions, of course.
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2012 21:24 |
|
rockinricky posted:One of those exceptions being the single of "With or Without You" by U2. That song is Side A and spins at 45 rpm. Side B spins at 33 rpm and has 2 songs. That's weird. I've never heard of that being done.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2012 00:54 |
|
Oppenheimer posted:A friend of mine just got a 40-inch crt TV for like 10 bux. I shudder to think of the weight of it. I still have a 27" CRT TV and googling tells me it weighs 108 lbs. So that 40" is probably close to 150-175lbs.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2012 15:27 |
|
You Are A Elf posted:You're thinking of Highway Hi-Fi, an in-car record player made for Chrysler in 1956 that took weird 10 inch discs that played at 16⅔ RPM. The company that made them was CBS (yes, as in the TV network) Electronics. It's no surprise that it was a colossal failure when you think of a record player in a car, especially one as large and heavy as a '50s Chrysler. You want real ridiculous failure, imagine a record player in a VW Beetle (top center):
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2012 18:44 |
|
axolotl farmer posted:See the windshield washer kit in the top left? They also sold a gasoline-powered heater.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2012 18:58 |
|
JediTalentAgent posted:edit: Are there even any decent DVD recorders with built-in tuners, anymore? Not that I've seen. Hell, even decent plain recorders are hard to find.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 12:28 |
|
Amaritudo posted:Really in the end, Blu-Ray won solely because Toshiba just didn't have the Hollywood clout that Sony did. There was a glimmer of hope when Paramount defected to HD-DVD but the loss of Warner put the final nail in the coffin. Sony got revenge over the whole Betamax thing.
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2012 03:18 |
|
When DVD recorders first came out, they sucked. I decided to roll the dice and buy this: Panasonic's DVD-RAM recorder (mine only recorded RAM discs, but could play DVDs & DVD-Rs). You could timeshift and edit on the disc. I used it to record shows from my pre-DVR satellite receiver, edit the show and copy it to a VHS tape. They were about $500. I had two. They both died within two years. I found one in a pawn shop last year for $60. I needed something since my cheapo DVD recorders all died and I still had about 20 DVD-RAM discs. It's been flawless.
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2012 04:10 |
|
kopiko posted:
I had this for some reason: You put it to the mouthpiece of the phone, push the button, AND IT DIALS THE NUMBER! I also had the requisite nerd attire calculator watch.
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2012 00:05 |
|
Invisble Manuel posted:I always wanted one of these: I've seen these go for hundreds on ebay.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 01:23 |
|
I bought the 30Gb version in 2005. It's been sitting on a shelf unused for over a year. I dug out the adapter and plugged it in and it's as good as ever. However, the battery is kaput, so I ordered a new one.
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2012 23:38 |
|
If we're taking about ancient hand-held games, I give you this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattel_Auto_Race I played the gently caress out of this game. It's so simple, it's ridiculous, but in the higher "gear", it would kick your rear end.
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2012 22:57 |
|
Perry Normal posted:For content, The Fisher-Price Movie Viewer And, of course, it's been hacked. http://www.retrothing.com/2008/07/modding-a-fishe.html
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2012 01:54 |
|
Armyman25 posted:The best part of the console tv was it made a nice stand for the new tv. Jeff Foxworthy posted:You might be a redneck if you have a working TV sitting on top of a non-working TV. I must be a redneck because I did this once.
|
# ¿ Sep 15, 2012 20:24 |
|
RillAkBea posted:Well we do still have all those toolbars that random freewares want you to install. The ones people usually install because they assume they're somehow necessary to run whatever they're installing. Gah! Toolbars. My nieces wreak havoc on my parents' computer (they're in their 70s and rarely use it) by installing toolbars. I went to their house one day last year and found that the upper third of the screen was chock full of toolbars. It took me over two hours to clean the damned thing. I recently discovered that my old AOL email address was still active. I haven't used it since 2000.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2012 20:51 |
|
Jasta posted:Yeah, I pay rent to older people and have to write them cheques, but that's the only time when I use them. The apartment complex where I live just started offering the opportunity to pay online. For a $10 "convenience" fee. I can get a box of checks for about $8 AND I live 30 feet from the office. I'll keep on writing checks.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2012 19:11 |
|
GoGoGadgetChris posted:Every apartment I've ever lived in has required checks. Those that have offered online payment always charge $10 to $35 for it. What gives with that? How is an online payment anything but easier for them? Paypal fees? Back when I lived in a natural-gas heated house, I paid with a check. If I paid over the phone, it costs $9.95. If I paid online, it cost $4.95. When I asked them why they would charge me to pay online and get their money instantly, but not charge me to pay with a check which could take days, they had no answer.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2012 20:06 |
|
BoutrosBoutros posted:There's just no excuse for old people to write checks. No, but you have to understand that "old people" are set in their ways. Some will adapt to newer tech and some will not.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2012 20:35 |
|
Phanatic posted:But a friend of mine in high school had something almost as cool. It was just a record player, with a regular old needle, but it had a tray like a CD player or even more like a laserdisc player. You'd eject the tray, load in a record, and press play. It didn't have a regular tone-arm, it had a track with a needle in it so it would always move perpendicular to the groove (the way a tone-arm swings in an arc annoys some audiophiles, I'm led to understand). Sounds like it was a linear turntable.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2012 19:03 |
|
minato posted:Our old record player used to have an automatic record changer. I had one of those. It was a BSR. One day the motor finally locked up. For those of you young whipper-snappers who collect old vinyl and notice that double albums are numbered Side 1/3 and 2/4, this is why. When you put the two albums on the changer like this: 2 - 1 and then flip them over you get this: 4 - 3 Some albums had a ridge molded in around the label to help prevent scratches when one disc landed on the other.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2012 19:17 |
|
^^^^drat YOU DICK Jedit posted:I'll see that and raise you flexidiscs. These were single-sided records printed on a thin vinyl sheet that would bend without damaging the groove. They were used in the pre-CD era as a way to include music or other audio content with books or magazines. CDs obsoleted them and they went out of production in 2000, but apparently there's recently been a resurgence of interest in them from the indie scene. I see your flexidiscs and raise you cereal box records from the late 60s/early 70s.
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2012 00:11 |
|
WithoutTheFezOn posted:I think you made a slight mistake. They were sides 1/4 on one record and 2/3 on the other, as I remember. Then the flip trick works. I had to check some of my double albums and you're right. Oddly enough, several of them are numbered 1/2 and 3/4.
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2012 15:22 |
|
Jedit posted:Of course I can believe it. I most recently saw a pneumatic transport system in a supermarket over here just a year or so ago. The hospital I work for has one as well.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2012 14:55 |
|
cobalt impurity posted:Doesn't every bank drive-through use this kind of thing as well, just bigger tubes? All the ones I've seen do.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2012 15:30 |
|
Code Jockey posted:Despite my love for it, I would say the Famicom Disk System is rather obsolete. That looks like something you would have seen on Star Trek TOS.
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2012 01:55 |
|
Killer robot posted:I don't remember those days, but I do remember this era: We had those when I was a kid (70s) and we were always told not to drop the pull tab into the open can for fear of swallowing it and dying.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2012 23:45 |
|
DNova posted:Because natural gas is a far cheaper source of heat energy to dry clothes. In the US, in places where natural gas is available (almost eveywhere), nobody in their right mind would choose an electric dryer. Last time I had a dryer, it was electric. When they deregulated natural gas in Georgia, the prices went through the loving roof.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2012 15:33 |
|
If you want to talk weird film formats, there's Scopitones. An early version of music videos you could watch in a jukebox. Here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=io7taNUIly4
|
# ¿ Nov 25, 2012 01:43 |
|
b0nes posted:I saw this on Youtube, and I thought I had saved it, but there was a piano using British(?) technology that used pieces of audio tape to play music. Anyone know what I am talking about? It might have even been posted in this thread. The Mellotron. A staple of 70s music.
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2012 02:03 |
|
DStecks posted:I'm still using my sister's old Zen Stone (Creative's answer to the iPod Nano), and it's gotta be pushing 6 years old now, and it still works great. I have one of those, too. Mine's about four years old and I use it everyday.
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2012 23:52 |
|
Bertrand Hustle posted:My first desktop had a 2 GB hard drive. I was ridiculously proud of that. It was top of the line. Now I have a 2 TB external HDD sitting on my desk that probably cost me less than the 2 GB would have at the time. I bought my first computer (Leading Edge Model D) in 1988. It had two 5.25" floppy drives because I couldn't afford the 10Mb HD at $500. I built a 386 machine in 1992 and put in a 400Mb drive that cost about $300. I just ordered a 2TB drive for $99. I've been ripping all of my DVDs and have tons of other video and have been waiting for terabyte drives to come down. I figure I'll need 8-10 TB to hold it all.
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2012 00:42 |
|
Here's an oldie, but a not-goodie: Polaroid's Polavision instant movie system. It created instant movies. Great, huh? Oh, wait. The movies only lasted 2.5 minutes. And were silent. And required a special player. Here's a commercial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLXfhMI7B5Q And a sample movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2pclBwpeBs This came out at about the same time as VHS/Beta video cameras. While those cameras were bulky and expensive, they did offer sound and a substantially longer recording time. Not to mention the tapes could be re-used. Nice try Polaroid.
|
# ¿ Dec 22, 2012 19:34 |
|
razorrozar posted:With that case on there, it looks kind of like a giant PSP UMD. Does that case go into whatever plays them, or do you take it off? You insert the cart into the player and the disc is released and you pull the empty cart back out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoTc9l7ObHY
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2012 03:23 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:Now I'm trying to remember which car had the cantilevered doors that slid into the wheel well and let you open the car doors even when there was very little room next to the car. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjoKa74zArs The Kaiser Darrin?
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2013 23:17 |
|
Monkey Fracas posted:I want a laserdisc for no good drat reason- those record-sized CDs are just so intriguing... I've had a laserdisc player for over 20 years. Still have the original unmolested Star Wars trilogy (thanks Columbia House Laserdisc Club!). I'll scan ebay now and then looking for oddball stuff.
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2013 22:20 |
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:Just remembered that I posted this in a YOSPOS thread a while back and never got around to putting it here. Better late than never! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ispW6-7b2sA A demo reel of the Scanimate. Warning: extreme 70s music!
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2013 17:45 |
|
Monkey Fracas posted:So before I was born TV looked like one big neverending episode of Soul Train? I kinda feel like I got screwed here, man. Hell, just look how movies were introduced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3q4_8_9hFI This makes me realize that no networks have movie nights anymore.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2013 18:08 |
|
I first saw this in Billy Idol's "Flesh for Fantasy" video and couldn't figure out what the hell it was (no internet in those days). Possibly for S&M dancers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw1oM7LBbxE Jim Stafford plays it on the Tonight Show (the logo is blacked out for some reason): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3VgdpU2nEw One of the musicians on the Simpsons used it on one of the early season episodes, too.
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2014 23:48 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:28 |
|
Base Emitter posted:The viola organista, Leonardo Davinci's hypothetical cross between harpsichord and hurdy-gurdy, as built by a Polish pianist: I do not envy the person who has to tune it.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2014 00:50 |