- T-1000
- Mar 28, 2010
-
|
AS for the energy per m^2, I appreciate the clarification, but I feel it's semantics. I like the example I use, because it's easy for people to understand. It's the heat we want in Solar Thermal, that's where the energy for our electricity comes from, and the point is that there's a lot more in a small area than we might think from our sunbathing experience. And I think 'melt steel' is a more powerful illustration than 'boil coffee'. I do accept this could be lazy science writing though, and am curious to hear more.
I mean if energy is 'the potential to do work', then I think the way I describe it is basically right. There is enough in that amount of sunlight to do that amount of work. Ideally I link it to the video I posted (or a more professional one with James May for example, but I like the first one because it's just a guy in the backyard).
The problem is it doesn't describe the amount of work. How big a piece of steel? How focused does the sunlight need to be? There's a big difference between melting a giant steel girder with a cheap mirror, and melting a milligram of steel foil with a large, very precise set of optics. Both would describe melting steel, but they are quantitatively completely different and equating them is sloppy. You can say that coffee takes approximately 4.18 joules per gram-Kelvin to heat up, but "melting steel" is vague and hard to quantify.
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2012 02:09
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2024 14:45
|
|