Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Man who tried to burn down mosque was a fan of Fox News:

quote:

The St. Joe resident, who brought several firearms and gas containers with him to the Islamic Center of Greater Toledo, told Judge Jack Zouhary he had become "riled up" after watching Fox News.

quote:

When asked by the judge if he knew any Muslim or what Islam is, Linn reportedly said, "No, I only know what I hear on Fox News and what I hear on radio."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Has this been posted? Anti-union douchebag-ette, Dana Loesche is suing her parent company for poor working conditions:

quote:

Dana Loesch, who claims to be the “Editor-in-Chief of Big Journalism” (this explains a lot), is suing the parent company of Breitbart.com. Apparently she was unaware that working for a crazy conservative media outlet would naturally involve “indentured servitude in limbo.” Hey, Dana, where you been, girl?

http://www.politicususa.com/anti-union-tea-party-poster-girl-dana-loesch-sues-breitbart-llc-hostile-working-conditions.html

Utterly delicious.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Sick_Boy posted:

So apparently right wing diehards want Piers Morgan off the air now, after he was tough on some gun lobbyist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC4JJWUtzkc

I didn't see the whole interview beforehand, but did the gun guy actually object to the idea of calling someone mentally deranged for carrying out a mass murder?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Zeroisanumber posted:

Hilarious, but you know that you have the snark turned up to 11 when even I think the article is too snarky.

quote:

Dana was hired by CNN to represent the “Tea Party” point of view for the 2012 elections. As the rest of the world is aware, the Tea Party is persona non grata these days. Dana better rebrand herself with the next wave of conservative hatred before she becomes irrelephant.

I'm probably a bad person for chuckling at that.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Has this been posted?

quote:

A Casey County man says the life-sized mannequin in his front yard of President Obama holding a slice of watermelon was meant as a joke and not a racist display.

"The way I look at it, it's freedom of speech," said Danny Hafley. "I don't know how other people will take it."


Hafley bought the Obama mask on sale after Halloween and put up the display around the time of November's presidential election.

The mannequin, dressed in a grey suit, clip-on tie and blue-collared shirt, was originally standing in Hafley's yard but the homeowner decided it would look better near the road.

When asked the reason behind the watermelon, Hafley responded that he thought the figure "might get hungry standing out here."

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Hey guys, apparently some guy at the National Review is sad that Democrats give too much money to the rich but not enough to the poor. :(

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Cordyceps Headache posted:

Why it's almost like he's not a socialist at all!

Or at the very least, the worst socialist ever.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

From Tea Party founder, Judson Philips:

quote:

What he really wants is the power to be a dictator.

Barack Obama does not like the American system of government. He doesn’t like our founding fathers either. Our founding fathers were very wise. They dealt with tyranny in their lifetime. The fundamental purpose of the way they set up our government was not to be efficient or even to accommodate rapid change.

It was to block the accumulation of power by one man.

Barack Obama wants to change this.



Obama does not love America. He hates America. He looks at America through his Marxist background and sees not the greatest nation in the world. He does not see the country that has done more good for more people than any other nation. He sees the evil oppressive power that Marxists always view America as.

By continuing to borrow money, unabated, he knows sooner or later debt will completely bring down the American economy and possibly the American state.

There is a deeper battle here as well.

If Barack Obama and the Party of Treason can beat the Republicans down to the point where they abdicate or at least refuse to fight for their Constitutionally mandated role in controlling the purse, America will no longer have three co-equal branches of government.

If Obama wins this next battle, it will fundamentally transform America and our government. Which is exactly what he said he wanted to do when he ran in 2008. Obama has spoken several times, almost longingly talking about how he wishes he had dictatorial powers. Now, here is his chance.

The legislative branch, instead of being equal to the executive will now become inferior and submissive. The tyranny of the strong leader that our founding fathers feared will have materialized here in America.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Spacedad posted:

Here's Rush getting defensive over being caught taking a ton of viagra not prescribed under his name with him to a sex tourism place (Dominican Republic) which is known for underaged prostitution:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGU31gaG4Hs

Wow, that's gotta be the first time I've seen Rush talk about his little adventure (even though he tried to deny that ever happened). As Cenk said, the amount of projection in that clip (liberals rely on internet rumors and inciting hate) was stunning.



Anyway, has this been posted? Dick Armey basically reveals what most on the left already knew - the conservative movement is one big money making scam:

http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_conservative_movement_is_still_an_elaborate_moneymaking_venture/

I have to say, if nothing else, bilking stupid, old racist White people out of their money seems like a lucrative venture. My hours have been cut to almost nothing at my current job (thanks a lot, ObaMAO!), and I could use a little extra change...


But then again, I don't know how I could live with myself. :/

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

lil mortimer posted:

Glenn Beck spent an hour this morning trashing Alex Jones. I think he's jealous.

Not surprising. Alex Jones has constantly trashed Beck, in many cases for supposedly not being "genuine".

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

BiggerBoat posted:

God, that Alex Jones interview was insufferable. The guy just yells and rants. It takes a special kind of rear end in a top hat to make Piers Morgan sympathetic.

Jesus Christ.

"Alex...Alex...Let me...can I ask you...Alex..."

I just saw the video finally. The first minute wasn't so bad, but then, holy poo poo...

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004


A few pages back, but...

1) It's true that the payroll tax cut wasn't extended, but are these douches seriously suggesting Obama WOULDN'T have extended it if he got the opportunity?
2) Do they not realize that gloating about this sort of poo poo interferes with the stereotype they have of Obama that he hates the rich and would do ANYTHING to reward the filthy masses?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Zuhzuhzombie!! posted:

Didn't Michael Steele have to apologize once?

Yup:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVgDTVbhF1A

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Example #583893834792 why Obama is the weirdest socialist dictator in history:

quote:

Former Senator Jim DeMint, the new president of the conservative Heritage Foundation, has decried Obamacare as “a cancer” that is “is fundamentally inconsistent with liberty.” During the Senate Obamacare fight, DeMint famously declared “If we’re able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him.”

But a new report from DeMint’s own organization suggests that, far from being incompatible with freedom, countries with health care systems with as much or significantly more government control over healthcare are the freest countries in the world.

The report in question is Heritage’s Economic Freedom Index, released annually since 1997. The report defines the concept of “economic freedom” in misleading right-wing terms, but even by those standards, it appears that universal health care systems far more expansive than Obamacare aren’t “fundamentally inconsistent with liberty.” In fact, the ten “freest” economies in 2013 by Heritage’s lights range from mandating individuals save a certain amount of money for health care to almost the entire health care system, including hospitals, being owned and operated by the government:

The countries they listed were:

1. Hong Kong
2. Singapore
3. Australia
4. New Zealand
5. Switzerland
6. Canada
7. Chile
8. Mauritius
9. Denmark


The U.S. under Obama's oppressive socialist regime comes in at a fairly distant no. 10. If only Obama would learn more from one of the paragons of right wing governments, like Canada.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Neil Cavuto knows why so many people are on food stamps: cause it's just too cool NOT to be on them!

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

If you tax the millionaires, there'll be no more millionaires! :(

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Does anyone know whether Ambassador Stevens was a Democrat or Republican?

One of the dumbest things about this Benghazi farce is the constant implication that the Republicans in congress (and the media) cared more about an Obama administration official than Obama (or Hillary) himself. I mean, sure you can have members of the other party in your administration but still.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

mr. mephistopheles posted:

Huckabee and Cain aren't evil, they're just idiots.

[quote="Zuhzuhzombie!!" post=""411909165"I also [i"]kinda[/i] like Huckabee in the same way that you described. He's a bit more poisonous, but in that "I just believe this stupid poo poo" kinda way and not a "how do I get on top of this pyramid scheme" kinda way.[/quote]

No, no no, no, no.

Huckabee, for all his "folksiness" is just as much of a piece of poo poo as any other right wing personality. He's that guy that you see in the movies all the time. You know, the pastor who seems all friendly and cordial, but when nobody's looking he indulges in every form of depravity imaginable. He's given several nods to the birthers throughout the years, as well as making other typically racist comments about Obama.

Mr Interweb fucked around with this message at 18:25 on Jan 28, 2013

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

"That goddamn socialist Obama's loves rich people too much!" :mad:

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Oklahoma State Senator says workers compensation gives people "an incentive to get hurt".

:newt:

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Shiva H. Vishnu...you guys have to see this poo poo:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/kirsten-powers-confronts-oreilly-over-shoutfest-with-colmes-bill-you-are-a-hundred-percent-wrong/

While this isn't anything new, it still needs to be said: Bill O'Reilly is a goddamned idiot. Holy poo poo.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-chris-wallace-grills-paul-ryan-on-his-desire-to-repeal-obamacare-thats-not-gonna-happen/

These people are such clowns. On the plus side, we haven't heard Paul Ryan talk for a while, so there's that.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Goatman Sacks posted:

So, I'm not too well versed on the whole "block grant" concept; I guess the argument is, send us a check with no strings attached and we can make a program that fits the needs of our state? But the counterargument is, you do that and conservative states are going to take that money, defund medicaid, and use it to subsidize tax cuts?

Sounds about right.

I understand the right wing argument on why the states (at least conservative ones) would like that, but how does block granting save the federal government money?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

I has a question.

One thing I've wondered about for the longest time, if states aren't allowed to have budget deficits, how was California several billions in the red for so many years?

ProperGanderPusher posted:

"You know what real rape is? BEING TAXED."

Although I have a hunch at least one person has actually said this.

I suggested Republicans do something similar to that whenever some evil journalist asks them a question about rape.

"The only rape I care about is the kind Obama's doing to the American people's wallets!"

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Bill O'Reilly: "I am not in business to make money or accumulate fame".


:psypop:

watt par posted:

Almost no state actually has a balanced budget.

I thought they're all required by law to do so?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Ghost of Reagan Past posted:

The best part is that even if Laffer is right (he is not), tax cuts would only increase revenue in certain constrained situations by his own theory's lights, and by his own theory's lights, raising taxes will sometimes raise revenues. And even if it's right, the shape of the Laffer curve is unknown, so we don't know where the 'sweet spot' would be, which means that cutting taxes because Laffer said so is just plain-old stupid ideology that's not backed even by their own voodoo economics!

Beat me to it.

Furthermore, what I never understood about this trickle down economics stuff is how giving a "job creator" a tax cut would give them any incentive to hire people? Nobody hires someone because they got some extra change laying around, they hire people if they need something to be done.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

I've been seeing on a lot of conservative websites the argument that Hoover didn't slash government spending during the Great Depression and that he was a big government Republican.

Is this a thing now on the Right?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Conservative "humor":

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/312043872970764288

Dana Loesche approves:

https://twitter.com/DLoesch/status/312044178760687616

Amused to Death posted:

This is actually true. Hoover never slashed spending. He did try many very small scale programs to try to alievate the depression, but he was overly convinced of charity. He expanded some programs, started some new ones(Federal Home Loan Act) but it was in no way big government, as it should've been. I mean one of those programs has his name on it(Hoover dam). FDR then put the scale of those programs into overdrive, and boom, unemployment begins to plummet. The idea Hoover took a completely hands off approach to the economy when the depression began is wrong, even if it often seems that way when compared to FDR, and the idea Hoover instituted big government is hilariously wrong since it's just an attempt to rewrite history and make FDR and everything that solved the depression look bad so we can give the SS trust fund to Wall St.

I look at it this way, if Mises hates Hoover's actions, he must've been doing something a little bit right
http://mises.org/rothbard/agd/chapter8.asp#public_works

Okay, so he didn't cut spending, but didn't increase spending nearly enough to fix the economy? Basically he was a weaksauce Keynesian, then?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

I never watched Dennis Miller's show in the 90s or whenever it was, but I saw a clip on the youtubes with him and a really young (and really ugly) Bill Maher, and Miller actually seemed pretty cool. Definitely noticeably different from the unbearable shithead he appears whenever he's on Bill O'Reilly's show.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

SnakePlissken posted:

He had the balls to make a song parodying Newt Gingrich during the height of his power in the House of Representatives -

Hey, that song was pretty catchy.

To briefly get off the subject of comedians for a bit, I bring an update from Rush Limbaugh stating that Hitler supported Obamacare too.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

ufarn posted:

Can't say I'm entirely surprised to see this:



I hope Chris Hayes will offset some of this, but only time will tell: http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/special-reports-landing-page/the-changing-tv-news-landscape/.

I'd love to see the methodology behind that.


In other news, WHAT THE gently caress:

http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/03/19/foxs-bolling-iraq-war-was-the-smartest-thing-ge/193131

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

So there's this meme that the righties have been saying for a while now that Bill O'Reilly repeated yesterday. When it's pointed out that we had much higher tax rates in the past than we do now, the argument goes that those rates don't count because no one was paying those high rates to begin with because of various loopholes and deductions. My question is, if no one was paying the top rates due to all the deductions and such, then...what was the point of constantly lowering the rates throughout the decades?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

kik2dagroin posted:

Wow, Rush just went on a long tirade about people collecting disability benefits. Why aren't these people included in the unemployment statistics? Why can't they provide for themselves? His evidence was 25% of people in a single county in Bumfuck, AL were on disability. :wtc:

With regards to the 'low information voter' shtick, I honestly think it's a clever way for him to get away with calling his own listeners idiots without explicitly saying so. Right after the election he was using 'people who disagree with me' and 'independent voters/republicans who are now independents' interchangeably, but now he has settled on using it for anyone that disagrees with him. In fact he had someone call in last week that he called out as 'low information' whom was none the wiser that he was being insulted.

One of my favorite instances with Rush throughout the past year was also right after the election, where he tried to explain to his listeners why he was wrong with his prediction that Romney would crush Obama in a landslide. His excuse? That Rush knew all along that Obama was gonna win but he didn't want to disappoint his audience. In other words, he just simply lied to them. This was his DEFENSE!

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

redshirt posted:

Which made me realize I'd enjoy listening to left wing radio. Is there anything out there worthwhile? Note, NPR is too right wing for my tastes these days.

-The Young Turks
-Stephanie Miller
-Randi Rhodes
-Thom Hartmann

And though I'm not sure if he still has a radio show, Ron Reagan. Dude is extremely entertaining.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

ReindeerF posted:

I don't really know the rest too well, but this person is just horrible to listen to.

I know she's not really enjoyed, even by liberals, but I like her. :smith:

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Speaking of left wing radio, is there anywhere I can go to download episodes of Miller, Rhodes, etc?

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

I'm a little conflicted about the Carrie v. Fox News beef.

On the one hand, I loving HATED Bruce Almighty.

On the other hand, Fox News is quite disgusting.

Argh!

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

fade5 posted:

I found Bruce Almighty funny, if not screamingly hilarious. Besides, how can you hate Morgan Freeman as God? He's God already, of course, but still.:colbert:

I went to go see the movie in the theaters when it came out (something I did extremely rarely at the time), and I really wanted to like it, but the movie was awful, and the story was absolute garbage. Morgan Freeman was the only saving grace, but alas even he wasn't enough to overlook the movie's transgressions.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Did Tea Party hero, Curt Schilling re-evaluate his beliefs after sucking on the government teat when he spoke out against doing such things his whole life? Take a guess. :newt:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Holy crap, I was just browsing Sean Hannity's twitter feed, and his audience has gone absolutely ballistic on Benghazi:

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/322882658784927745

The tweet had nothing to do with Benghazi by the way.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply