|
But won't they be upside down? 
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2024 21:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 04:54 |
|
|
Yes, but you can apply a 180 degree rotation upon import in your editor of choice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2024 23:13
|
|
|
Yeast posted:Don’t worry the lenses will work in other countries too. But the focus rings will work the other way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2024 23:15
|
|
|
I have a z50 and I just bought a 28-200 as an all around outdoor lens and I’ve been pleased with it. I’m wondering though if I should return it and get that new 28-400? Over kill for shooting kids sports and such?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2024 23:41
|
|
|
Keep the 24-200. 400mm (600mm) is cool for birding, but probably way more than you need for kids sports. 28mm (42mm) on the wide end is pretty cramped on a crop camera, too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2024 23:54
|
|
|
therattle posted:But the focus rings will work the other way. Most non-Nikon users would say that's the right way. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2024 01:03
|
|
|
Any suggestions on what to look for to get a couple older used lenses for a Nikon D200? My mom gave me her old D200 and a fairly cheap-feeling 70-300 lens over the weekend and I'm having a lot of fun shooting with it. Very different experience than my Olympus E-M5 I've mostly been shooting with, and a few of the images I got out of it just playing around have really impressed me for the age of the camera. I'd like to get one or two shorter lenses to play around with but am a bit overwhelmed by the sheer number of options out there. I'm thinking maybe a 35-50ish equivalent prime and a shorter zoom lens would be fun to grab and mess around with.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 13:21
|
|
|
The 17-55 2.8 DX is an amazing lens for the price these days.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 13:28
|
|
|
I adore my 35mm 1.8 its so cheap but so so so so good I also really love my Sigma 18-35 1.8 but that's getting up there in price. Might not be worth spending $800 on a lens for a body that old.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 13:59
|
|
|
35mm 1.8 DX is a no brainer for a DX owner. They go for £50 on second hand sites these days, buy 2! For standard zooms the 18-55 2.8 is good if a bit hefty. Worth noting any lenses that are newer AF-P lenses won't work on the D200. AF, AF-S, AF-I, G and D lenses all work fine. The AI, AI-S and E will partially work. Mega Comrade fucked around with this message at 14:24 on Apr 2, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 14:02
|
|
|
Thanks! Looking at the 35mm 1.8 now and will definitely grab one second hand for that price. The 17-55 also looks like a good option if I can find a deal, will keep an eye out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 14:04
|
|
|
16-85mm might also be a good option. Sigma also has some good zoom lenses in this range, their 17-50 can be found cheap. 35mm is a nobrainer. Wibla fucked around with this message at 14:15 on Apr 2, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 14:12
|
|
|
Should note that I started my wildlife stuff with the uber cheap 70-300. It's an okay lens that gives you good reach for local birds and squirrels and bunnies n' stuff if you're into that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 14:13
|
|
|
Also consider the small 24/28/50/60 F2.8 D primes. They go for pretty cheap and are fun lenses. Optically they have soft corners but as intended for FF a DX camera chops those off anyway.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 14:14
|
|
|
D200 is pretty noisy at high ISO but with the new AI denoise stuff I'm getting a lot of mileage out of my old D200 NEFs. I only wish I hadn't shot so many irredeemable JPEGs with it. Was I too lazy for post processing back then? Dumb.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 15:09
|
|
|
Mega Comrade posted:Also consider the small 24/28/50/60 F2.8 D primes. I'll second this and add a rec for a 20mm for their compactness. Full frame lenses excel on DX/half-frame plus have extra utility if you ever acquire a full frame body. There's an almost exhaustive catalog of Nikkor glass at this link if you're feeling particularly detail oriented whilst shopping around: http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/specs.html
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 16:32
|
|
|
50mm 1.8 is also an amazing lens for the price and if the D200 is a 2/3 frame the it works really well as a short portrait telephoto.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2024 20:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 04:54 |
|
|
Anyone shoot with the AF-S 28mm 1.4E? Is it really a massive step up from a 24-70 2.8? I don’t care if I lose the zoom as I usually shoot on the wide end.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 15:44
|
|
