|
That's a lot to spend on a sensor cleaning, especially when I can take it to a repair center for a professional cleaning in a dustfree environment for not that much more.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2013 17:47 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 15:55 |
|
snuffles is trying to decide which one to buy, I'm assuming s/he doesn't want both
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2013 02:00 |
|
He can just shoot in DX mode until more surprise monies come.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2013 17:45 |
|
I got an old 28-85 3.5-4.5 macro for $40 including shipping from KEH, that seems like a much better buy to me. Condition was listed as BGN but the glass is clean and there were just some scratches on the zoom barrel (all metal construction). If you can find one of those you should get it instead, because it's a cheap and awesome walkaround lens.
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2013 21:03 |
|
Paul MaudDib posted:For the record you shouldn't do part-steps. Most camera systems can't actually vary the sensor continuously, only in single-stop steps, so 1000 is really "ISO 1600 pulled 2/3 stop" with all the noise that entails. Isn't this true for every ISO that isn't the base ISO? So if you have a camera that's base ISO is 160 and you shoot at 1600, it just pushes the RAW by 3 1/3 stops?
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2013 19:11 |
|
I don't think I've seen any porn with nice bokehs. Or any bokehs.
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2013 05:15 |
|
....why would you need another 135mm for Nikon?
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2013 23:41 |
|
Might as well get a BMCC at that point and shoot raw video (or ProRes)
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2013 19:44 |
|
in raw mode video is recorded into folders containing individual DNG frames, take your stills from there Also the main shortcoming for this camera is battery life, and this is remedied with external battery packs. And no F-mount option isn't a shortcoming unless we're saying every Canon shooter out there is dealing with a serious shortcoming.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2013 20:00 |
|
If you have a 5Dmk3 you might just bypass the BMCC and just do Magic Lantern raw, but workflow is going to be so much easier on the BMCC. Also the BMCC has the same DR as the D800, the 5D falls short by quite a bit. OR just save and buy a house and be a responsible adult instead of a creative professional
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2013 20:09 |
|
So I guess Nikon is releasing a D610...I can't for the life of me tell what's actually different about it from the D600.
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2013 06:10 |
|
Yeah I'm not stoked about the D600 losing value on the used market barely a year after it was released. The dust and oil problems suck, but a sensor cleaning takes care of that poo poo. It just seems weird to release a new model so soon.
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2013 18:29 |
|
Goddammit, my D600 just died in the middle of shooting some video. It turns on bit displays the ERR code and I can't get into live view; the mirror is stuck and won't go back down. Any ideas for troubleshooting before I send this off for repair?
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2013 01:12 |
|
Raw is never really superfluous regardless of where the image will be published.
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2013 02:29 |
|
I'm not sure who this camera is marketed to but $3k is pretty laughable. Yeah you'd get a much better value by going with a D800.
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2013 21:33 |
|
This is also why you should shoot in raw though, because the camera can process and export a JPG.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2013 18:52 |
|
I had the same thing happen to me while using the 35 f2 D lens. Took me forever to figure out that a shutter press would fix it. Worst part was, it happened while recording video and it didn't even finish the recording, so I had to immediately reshoot with my backup Canon Rebel.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2013 21:54 |
|
I've done that before though and it was fine.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2013 23:17 |
|
I like the old school film speed dial, but holy crap is that thing a giant clusterfuck of dials and buttons
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2013 18:41 |
|
I guess they're trying to go for the old school FE look, but my black and beat up FE looks way cooler than this camera.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2013 20:05 |
|
I dunno man if I had a trust fund to blow I wouldn't be messing with anything less than a medium format body to separate myself from the plebes
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2013 21:28 |
|
I'm shocked they didn't manage to toss in a sextant and a map of pre-Weimar Germany into that photo
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2013 22:11 |
|
Delivery McGee posted:The big dials for shutter speed and ISO are so ridiculous, I love it. :v How do you set the aperture, though? Use an old/high-end lens, or is that what the knob on the front face does? The camera has the standard Nikon controls on the back including a command dial which I assume will be the aperture control since shutter speed already has it's own retro-style dial on top.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2013 01:58 |
|
The only thing I don't like about those dials is that they look so clunky. Here's what the dials look like on the FE: Much nicer looking.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2013 02:10 |
|
HPL posted:And every so often, you'll think you have a full card, but when you plug it in to your computer, the card is empty because you didn't insert the card into the camera just so. One of the guys in the cinematography thread was telling us about how they used to haze new people by telling them they had to replace REDMAGs inside a film changing tent or else it wouldn't record video properly
|
# ¿ Nov 8, 2013 08:45 |
|
powderific posted:Yaaaay. I love the poo poo out of my 35mm f2 for its teeny-ness and close focus distance, but I'd love to have the AF-S motor and some nicer optics. Yeah, also it vignettes like a mofo wide open.
|
# ¿ Dec 24, 2013 19:26 |
|
emotive posted:Maybe I'll at least go look at it. I'd wager by "upgraded to D610 specs" they really mean "fixed the oil spotting issue". All it takes is a wet sensor clean
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2013 19:27 |
|
Probably means the G because it's the only cheapo 35mm lens out there.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2013 22:08 |
|
lmao the oil thing was annoying but you could either take it in for multiple cleanings, or just use it for like 2-5k actuations after which time most of the oil is gone and THEN clean it.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2014 18:49 |
|
404notfound posted:Clutching onto the F-mount makes things inconvenient for the entry-level Nikon bodies, but it's nice being able to mount pretty much any old-rear end Nikon lens to my D7000 and expect it to work flawlessly. Yeah I got an EX grade Tokina 80-200 2.8 from KEH for $180 and so far it owns. I'll be testing it out today, but so far it seems to be decently sharp and the AF isn't awful. Not as good as an AF-S lens, but where else am I going to find a telephoto zoom at 2.8 for that price?
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2014 19:36 |
|
I have a D600 with just around 10k clicks on it, one wet sensor clean and it's pretty much oil free these days (there's one single spot that shows up past f11 on most of my lenses if I set it to infinity focus, but otherwise it's fine). At the prices the D600 is going for these days, it is well worth the price even if you have to take it in for cleaning.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2014 00:07 |
|
What's a cheap FX macro lens? Or should I just get extension tubes?
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2014 21:04 |
|
In addition, his "crappy superzoom is just as sharp as this 24-70 and is cheaper and lighter therefore don't buy the 24-70" is sooo misleading and his example photos suck real bad and are useless for the basis of comparison.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2014 23:19 |
|
At anything lower than like 6400, it looks exactly the same except there's more NR done in camera apparently?
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2014 19:03 |
|
If you want a cheap zoom (and have a body that can drive a screw AF lens) find a Tokina 80-200 2.8 (non-pro). Not as sharp as the newer AF-S 70-200's but not too shabby either. I got one on KEH for $180.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2014 02:42 |
|
I want to reiterate everyone's love for the 1.8D as long as you have a body with the AF motor. It's a great cheapo 50 compared to Canon's shitbox 50 1.8.
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2014 20:34 |
|
Wild EEPROM posted:Places like bestbuy will also have lenses available to try. Places like Best Buy are only going to have kit superzooms or other non-pro and yet expensive MSRP lenses.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 16:16 |
|
Musket posted:The G means Gimped. Lacks aperture ring, wont work on old rear end Nikon bodies. Somewhere is a krock chart. He calls it gelded
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 21:55 |
|
My favorite Krock thing ever is his review of the 28-300 kit lens, it's so good that it's the only lens you need to have!
|
# ¿ May 26, 2014 19:39 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 15:55 |
|
Has anyone ever used the Vivitar 24/2 on a digital body? I'm curious mostly about sharpness and CA since I'd be using it primarily for video.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2014 23:08 |